"OK, Cindy, we need something that suggests Incestual Necrophilia..."

Skeptic

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
18,312
Folks, you're not going to believe this.

This is a photograph of that brave, honest (blah blah blah) woman, Cindy Sheehan, from "Vanity Fair". In which she is seen pretending to sleep on her son's grave.

Here it is:

sheehanasleep.jpg


I am sorry, but I have no idea what to say about this. I am, to be truthful, not angry at her: it simply makes me double sure that she had simply lost her mind after he son's death, which is understandable.

But did Vanity Fair TOTALLY lose their minds? Just wondering.
 
I don't know what, if anything, this picture demonstrates. However, at some point her message seems to have drowned in her celebrity.
 
As obviously contrived as this photo is, I see no evidence of "incestual necrophilia." It's merely a woman lying on the grave of her son.

Were you born this callous and disgusting or do you practice?
 
Celebrity is such an odd thing. IMO this became about Cindy a long time ago.
 
Her 15 minutes are already over. Vanity Fair is like a month or two late.

Hey, Madonna keeps managing to shock/titillate/bizarre her way back into the spotlight every now and then; why not Cindy? I'll bet she's posing for Penthouse by Memorial Day.
 
As obviously contrived as this photo is, I see no evidence of "incestual necrophilia." It's merely a woman lying on the grave of her son.

Were you born this callous and disgusting or do you practice?
As the previous posts show, in politics it doesn't matter, when it comes to political religious beliefs, anything goes which supports your faith.
 
Were you born this callous and disgusting or do you practice?

Mephisto,
Remember how long we had the world's "sympathy" after 9/11? It lasted about 2 months at best. Why? Because we refused to play to our victimhood and retaliated.

Cindy Sheehan initially had the sympathy of most of the persons in this thread who are now taking the mick. She's spun her victimhood out to absurd lengths; and allowed herself to be used as a tool by MoveOn.org and all the usual suspects. Simply put; she is a sad and pathetic pawn of the anti-war left who is now cynically turning her son's tragic death into the vehicle for her own celebrity. As the wheels of this d-list celebrity come off she must find ways to crank up the volume lest she be forced to acknowlege that the egg-timer on her 15 mins has been incessently chiming since September.

She has turned herself into a transparent cartoon Mephisto...we didn't do that to her...she did it to herself with mucho help from her new "friends". So don't hate us for our sniggering; she's the dark comedienne; we're just her audience; and it's way past time for someone somewhere to give her the hook.

-z
 
Curious. Has anyone here ever lost someone dear to them? Immediate family you were very close to? I have. I don't find that picture odd at all. In fact, I can identify with it. The person who took the photo created a pretty powerful image there, even if it's lost in the current political climate. When pain of your loss starts wearing on you, all you want to do is sleep somewhere near them. If that's a weird sentiment, then you must have had a hard time reading Hamlet.

That said, all of this is about politics anyway. Whatever side you come from, that's the message you're going to see in the image. Everyone on every side is going to be nasty and heartless and exploit whatever they can from this. The mass media cycle is going to repeat those heartless and nasty comments endlessly and zombies for both parties are going to puppet them until the memory of this brave soldier is a two bit marketing gimmick for everyone. So go on. Have it out. Race to the bottom. Don't tell me, "Cindy started it." either or you're staying inside for recess today.
 
Folks, you're not going to believe this.

This is a photograph of that brave, honest (blah blah blah) woman, Cindy Sheehan, from "Vanity Fair". In which she is seen pretending to sleep on her son's grave.

Here it is:

sheehanasleep.jpg


I am sorry, but I have no idea what to say about this. I am, to be truthful, not angry at her: it simply makes me double sure that she had simply lost her mind after he son's death, which is understandable.

But did Vanity Fair TOTALLY lose their minds? Just wondering.

That's just downright sick. She is mentally ill.

I don't blame Vanity Fair at all. They concluded (probably correctly) that it will sell more copies of their magazine.
 

Back
Top Bottom