Bill Barr and his October Surprise

Minoosh said:
How do you know?
Click to expand...

"Sure, the U.S. Treasury Department may have declared one of his former associates—Ukrainian parliamentarian Andrii Derkach, who worked with Giuliani on his hunt for dirt on the Bidens—to be an “active Russian agent.” But that’s some Deep State talk, he added. “The chance that Derkach is a Russian spy is no better than 50/50.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-...rked-with-a-russian-spy-to-dig-dirt-on-bidens

And because no where in the reported story does Andrii Derkach make an appearance. Unless you have some inside information, the hardware was left at a repair shop by Hunter Biden. The FBI was contacted through an intermediary, then given to the FBI under a Grand Jury subpoena. A copy was given through the mediator of the repair shop guy to Robert Costello who is Giuliani's attorney.
 
Last edited:
Given that this story does include the FBI, Barr's silence is certainly not a sign of support by the DOJ for the Rudy story.
 
xjx388 said:
Even if they are real, they aren't really a smoking gun as far as showing corruption. It would be surprising if his contacts didn't try to get him to make introductions and use his influence. The question is whether or not those efforts bore any fruit and I don't think there is evidence that they did.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Even if authentic, the email is a thank you for a possible meeting in the future. A meeting that was never shown to have ever happened. That's not a smoking gun, it's a bunch of hot air being blown out of Trump's and Giuliani's backsides.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
Given that this story does include the FBI, Barr's silence is certainly not a sign of support by the DOJ for the Rudy story.
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean, everyone went crazy when Comey pulled his stunt in 2016. I doubt Barr could say anything either way without getting the same treatment. Ditto for Wray. They actually aren't supposed to comment.
 
TahiniBinShawarma said:
And yet the laptop was taken from the repair guy by the FBI. Now, are you saying Biden didn't take it in? The emails are fake? Fake and planted? This repair guy made his story up?
Click to expand...

The FBI doesn't seem to think the laptop or emails are worth pursuing, they didn't present it to the Senate as evidence against Hunter and they're not talking about it now. But you've convinced me, Hunter Biden is not a good candidate for President and I'm not voting for him.
 
The testimony of the computer repair shop guy that Hunter Biden left it there and then didn’t pick it up Is evidence of authenticity. If Hunter Biden had the emails on his computer, it is reasonable to assume they are authentic. I am glad I could help you with this.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_901

(a) In General. To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.

(b) Examples. The following are examples only — not a complete list — of evidence that satisfies the requirement:

(1) Testimony of a Witness with Knowledge. Testimony that an item is what it is claimed to be.
 
Stacyhs said:
Exactly. Even if authentic, the email is a thank you for a possible meeting in the future. A meeting that was never shown to have ever happened. That's not a smoking gun, it's a bunch of hot air being blown out of Trump's and Giuliani's backsides.
Click to expand...

You are stuck on meetings

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...-guy-referenced-in-hunters-massive-c-n2578275

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/15/hunter-biden-demanded-chinese-billionaire-pay-10-m/

If Biden was taking money and not reporting it, I'm sure it still wouldn't make a difference to you. Only Trump could possibly be compromised by supposed foreign money, isn't that right?
 
Without Fox News bothering to verify the signature on the invoice, they are spreading mere hearsay. By linking to their hearsay, you are also spreading hearsay. Hearsay is worthless and not evidence.
 
Silly Green Monkey said:
Without Fox News bothering to verify the signature on the invoice, they are spreading mere hearsay. By linking to their hearsay, you are also spreading hearsay. Hearsay is worthless and not evidence.
Click to expand...


You've just shown you don't know what hearsay is. LOL. They produced the invoice. So has other publications.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom