• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Trans Women are not Women 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
And in general, it's not discomfiting to see other naked men in an area that is designed for the exclusive use of naked male people.

I wouldn’t necessarily say that. The old dudes at the Y who stand in front of the mirror shaving after their shower without bothering with a towel make me pretty discomfited. But it’s really, really not a sexual thing. It’s more I don’t like to see the gruesome details of the ravages of time.
 
Unfortunately, those perverts do exist and trans people want us to ignore that fact simply because they feel it harms their rights.

Boo hoo.

I don't believe it's trans people wanting us to ignore this, from what I've seen here and on twitter it's male 'woke bros' who like to pretend the patriarchy doesn't exist.
 
I don't believe it's trans people wanting us to ignore this, from what I've seen here and on twitter it's male 'woke bros' who like to pretend the patriarchy doesn't exist.

Not sure what "woke bros" or "patriarchy" has to do with any thing
 
No. Most transgender people, and the vast majority of transsexuals are NOT perverts. But some transgender people are. I'm inclined to think that THIS transgender person is pervy.

Her OKCupid profile screenshot

Also, now unable to find...

Her personal blogs talking about her preference for young women as sexual partners, and how much she loves having sex with her penis, and how great that feels, and how taking estrogen makes her feel extra horny.

A dating profile or blog seems like the appropriate place to discuss sexual interests. Plenty of people with adventurous sex lives in private have no problem acting respectfully in public places, and I still see no evidence that this woman was engaged in any deliberate voyeurism or exhibitionism during the normal use of a locker room and sauna.

This is proof she's a perv? She's got a horny dating profile, does this shock you? Seeking out other horny people on the internet for consensual sexual activity doesn't strike me as any kind of issue. The grasping at straws here is pathetic.
 
Last edited:
A dating profile or blog seems like the appropriate place to discuss sexual interests. Plenty of people with adventurous sex lives in private have no problem acting respectfully in public places, and I still see no evidence that this woman was engaged in any deliberate voyeurism or exhibitionism during the normal use of a locker room and sauna.

This is proof she's a perv? She's got a horny dating profile, does this shock you? Seeking out other horny people on the internet for consensual sexual activity doesn't strike me as any kind of issue. The grasping at straws here is pathetic.

The grasping at straws is trying to justify a biological male lesbian with a penis using a locker room in front of underage girls.

The real world exists outside your imaginary one.
 
There's no such thing as a "biologically male lesbian".

Screaming "men aren't women" into the void even as trans-affirming civil rights protections are slowly being written into law. #winning.

The transphobes took a fat L on the Evergreen pool case, and that's just a preview of things to come.
 
Corrective rape seems to be one of the solutions on Twitter to these transphobic lesbians who don't like the taste of girl dick
 
It seems to boil down to a position where Suburban Turkey is taking the position that it is the right of an adult male to undress in the presence of female minors, provided that adult male claims to be a woman. If the female minors object to the person with a penis being naked in their presence, while they are also naked... then those female minors (and anyone who supports them) are bigots and have no right to object to penises in their naked presence.

Screaming "men aren't women" into the void even as trans-affirming civil rights protections are slowly being written into law. #winning.

The transphobes took a fat L on the Evergreen pool case, and that's just a preview of things to come.

I notice you never confirmed Emily's Cat's understanding of things.

She's correct isn't she? That does seem to be your position, isn't it?

The girls at the Evergreen swimming pool were bigots, and we don't need to go back nearly that far. That Palatine, Illinois school district that gave rise to "Can she put the towel over her eyes?" voted this fall to remove any towel restriction. Trans girls were just like regular girls, so no towel required, no privacy curtain, no extra restrictions.

And there was a girl on the swim team there objecting. That bigoted loser. I'll hunt up a link after a meeting.
 
Last edited:
I notice you never confirmed Emily's Cat's understanding of things.

She's correct isn't she. That does seem to be your position, isn't it?

The girls at the Evergreen swimming pool were bigots, and we don't need to go back nearly that far. That Palatine, Illinois school district that gave rise to "Can she put the towel over her eyes?" voted this fall to remove any towel restriction. Trans girls were just like regualar girls, so no towel required, no privacy curtain, no extra restrictions.

And there was a girl on the swim team there objecting. That bigoted loser. I'll hunt up a link after a meeting.

I am of the opinion that transgender women are women and should be treated as such. There is no evidence that Ms. Francis is insincere in her gender identity nor was engaging in any provocative or otherwise inappropriate behavior in the locker rooms other than just existing as a trans woman. The decision to allow her to continue to use the women's facilities is the correct one, and extending use of the private room to those that object is a polite gesture, though not necessary.

I don't know enough of the motivations of individuals involved here to declare them bigots, but it is unambiguously clear that this issue has been adopted by clearly bigoted individuals and organizations for the purposes of demonizing trans people and shaping public policy. I am deeply suspicious of those that seem to find themselves in alignment with theocratic bigots.
 
Last edited:
I think its unambiguously clear that the issue has been adopted by violent misogynists who get their thrills silencing and violencing women
 
I am of the opinion that transgender women are women and should be treated as such. There is no evidence that Ms. Francis is insincere in her gender identity nor was engaging in any provocative or otherwise inappropriate behavior in the locker rooms other than just existing as a trans woman. The decision to allow her to continue to use the women's facilities is the correct one, and extending use of the private room to those that object is a polite gesture, though not necessary.

I don't know enough of the motivations of individuals involved here to declare them bigots, but it is unambiguously clear that this issue has been adopted by clearly bigoted individuals and organizations for the purposes of demonizing trans people and shaping public policy. I am deeply suspicious of those that seem to find themselves in alignment with theocratic bigots.

Oh, come on dude, have the guts to admit your position. Give up the weasel words. The girls were bigots.

Here's a link to a much more recent case, and in this case bigoted loser Julia Burcar even explains her motivation. Can you do it? Can you admit that your position is that she is a bigot? Let's hear it, man. There's a video in the tweet that is in this story.

https://www.themix.net/2019/11/swimmer-reacts-transgender-locker-room/

Actually, "have the guts" probably isn't the best expression to use. I think "Have the balls" to call Julia and the Evergreen girls and all the others bigots fits the moment more perfectly. Interestingly, the use of that expression provides an opportunity to note that there are indeed a lot of women with more balls than you, but you have to understand that's speaking metaphorically. They don't actually have testicles, and even if they did, quantity, or even size, of those testicles would not matter. It's just an expression. Kind of sexist, really, equating courage and masculinity. That is obviously not an actual correlation.

So can you do it? Can you say that they are the bigots? Because they are. Well, if anyone is, it's them. The only thing that makes those other organizations "clearly bigoted" is that they hold the same position as the girls.
 
Oh, come on dude, have the guts to admit your position. Give up the weasel words. The girls were bigots.

Here's a link to a much more recent case, and in this case bigoted loser Julia Burcar even explains her motivation. Can you do it? Can you admit that your position is that she is a bigot? Let's hear it, man. There's a video in the tweet that is in this story.

https://www.themix.net/2019/11/swimmer-reacts-transgender-locker-room/

Actually, "have the guts" probably isn't the best expression to use. I think "Have the balls" to call Julia and the Evergreen girls and all the others bigots fits the moment more perfectly. Interestingly, the use of that expression provides an opportunity to note that there are indeed a lot of women with more balls than you, but you have to understand that's speaking metaphorically. They don't actually have testicles, and even if they did, quantity, or even size, of those testicles would not matter. It's just an expression. Kind of sexist, really, equating courage and masculinity. That is obviously not an actual correlation.

So can you do it? Can you say that they are the bigots? Because they are. Well, if anyone is, it's them. The only thing that makes those other organizations "clearly bigoted" is that they hold the same position as the girls.

I don't want to speak on the Evergreen swimmers because I have yet to see any quotes or sources about their position. The police report mentions a coach confronting Colleen in the sauna, and I saw an interview with a parent. I have no idea what the position of the individual students are, how many actually object, and what their reasoning might be, so i can't pass a judgement.

That Palatine student seems to have a real animus towards trans women. Based on your link, it sure smacks of bigotry to me. She's young, perhaps her moral reasoning will improve with age.
 
I am of the opinion that transgender women are women and should be treated as such.

That's... not actually useful. They are not female. Should they be treated as female? That's a harder question, but it's the one that matters more.

There is no evidence that Ms. Francis is insincere in her gender identity nor was engaging in any provocative or otherwise inappropriate behavior in the locker rooms other than just existing as a trans woman.

Leaving aside the issue of sincerity of her identity since I don't think sincerity suffices, this is simply wrong. What she did was inappropriate. Deliberately acting in a manner that you know will make the people around you deeply uncomfortable when there are easy ways to mitigate that discomfort is not appropriate behavior. It is antisocial behavior. "Existing as a trans woman" doesn't give her a pass on basic consideration.

I am deeply suspicious of those that seem to find themselves in alignment with theocratic bigots.

I am deeply suspicious of those that seem to find themselves in alignment with "Jessica" Yaniv.
 
Leaving aside the issue of sincerity of her identity since I don't think sincerity suffices, this is simply wrong. What she did was inappropriate. Deliberately acting in a manner that you know will make the people around you deeply uncomfortable when there are easy ways to mitigate that discomfort is not appropriate behavior. It is antisocial behavior. "Existing as a trans woman" doesn't give her a pass on basic consideration.

I assure you, those white kids in the first desegregated schools were sincerely and deeply uncomfortable with the presence of their black peers. The correct response was, and remains, "too bad".

The comfort of the majority is an anathema to the concept of individual human rights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom