I don't know if that's true. Pretty much anybody can run in a primary, even for President. Prominent Republicans apparently spoke against the Qanon woman. Maybe the local party should find a way to be more restrictive.
Anyone can run, but to win you have to get enough votes.
In the case of the latest QAnon proponent in Georgia this wasn't a case of someone running unopposed in a district which was bound to end up returning a Democrat, it's a safe GOP district and there was at least one alternative (one assumes more moderate) candidate.
This candidate fairly reflects the people who voted in the primary which IMO means that, unless there was a rash of Democrats voting in a spoiler candidate in a GOP primary (which I think unlikely), means that the GOP activists in that district want that kind of candidate.
edited to add.....
The fact that prominent Republicans spoke against the candidate shows that the local party isn't prepared to be cowed by those prominent Republicans and instead have chosen to select the candidate that they think will best serve their district.
IOW the party bigwigs no longer have control over local issues (if they ever did).
Last edited:
