Davidlpf
Muse
Like when he said the moon was part of Mars.Then you aren't paying attention.
.
Like when he said the moon was part of Mars.Then you aren't paying attention.
.
Then you aren't paying attention.
When a successful person does something that looks stupid to you, you should consider the possibility that you don't understand what it is that they're doing.
Trump wasn't brought. He barged his way in, when none of the party establishment wanted him. He beat out a crowd of Republican contenders, and then defeated Hillary when nobody thought he could.
Democratic strategists might call him stupid, but if they actually believe that, they'll lose to him again.
*sigh* no he didn’t win it on his own. Stop trying to tell us how smart Trump is when clearly he isn’t. He cheated royally and had Putin’s help. Like he always has for years. On his own, he would never have been a candidate. He crashed casinos...how smart can THAT be?
I didn't say he won it on his own. No one does. But he wasn't picked by the establishment.
He isn't anyone's puppet, and certainly not Putin's. This is conspiratorial nonsense.
There's a reason that members of his cabinet say he is a ******* moron. It's because he's a ******* moron.Of course I don’t understand what Trump is doing as president. No one does.
Trump certainly could not explain what he is doing. He has trouble assembling a coherent sentence.
Turning an inheritance into bankruptcies is not my idea of successful.
Democratic strategists are planning their fight against Trump strategists. Not against the useful idiot himself.
"World War III" (along with its variations) and "Iran" are trending on Twitter."Cry 'Havoc!,' and let slip the dogs of war."
The way I see it there a few possible outcomes to all this:
1) both side back down
2) there is a war between them but no one else is dragged into it.
The majority of the Iranian people are not great supporters of the government so could there be another civil war or the people will turn away from the west and whatever short term victory will result in greater disaster left in the region.
3) there is a war and other countries are dragged in.
Hopefully case 1 but unlikely.
There are few good reasons to assume that this new raised level of conflict, halfway between cold and hot wars, will be stable. Both sides have a long history of misreading each other’s intentions and overreaching.
And while the consequences of Suleimani’s killing are unclear, what is almost certain is that Trump has not thought them through. He made the decision while on holiday at his Florida resort. He did it without the sombre presidential address to explain his actions to the nation as is customary at such pivotal junctures in the country’s history, merely tweeting out a US flag and leaving it to the Pentagon make the announcement.
Over the past three years, the national security decision-making process, by which the pros and cons of US action were once carefully weighed, has been gutted. There are few high-level policy meetings any more. The independent thinkers in Trump’s orbit have left the stage, leaving a president who ultimately trusts his gut instincts above any expert.
It is those instincts that have, more than any other single factor, led the US and Iran to this point, and in particular Trump’s visceral hatred of his predecessor, Barack Obama, and his diplomatic legacy, the 2015 nuclear deal. Destruction of the deal and the economic strangulation of Iran, became a central imperative of Trumpian foreign policy.