Or the pope lives in a palace stuffed with art treasures while heading a religion based on rejecting material wealth. Although I do think that one may not be completely unfair.
To be fair at a certain point it would certainly become a problem.
Nobody (hopefully) is saying it's wrong to never eyeroll at the very least at hypocrisy at any point.
But "I get to pretend this problem doesn't exist until someone argues against it from a position of 100% moral perfection"
And even beyond that "Sometimes you have to use resources even if your overreaching argument is about preserving resources" is hardly the kind of thing we should have to justify or stop the discussion to explain.