And just because He may allow us to rule ourselves, doesn't mean He has the final say-so over anything.If god is everywhere at the same time, and hell is the absence of (or separation from) your god, how can he be omnipotent?
Damn, that's good, Kumar. If you squint your eyes, it almost looks like English. Therefore, I've nominated you for the language prize.GOD, being "omni" but still with indescribable & infinite properties, can do/know everything & remain present everywhere, in evey thing or being. He may effect such act or deeds himself, by forming/creating/concentrating-- HIM IN HIS complexes. OK? One out of those complexes may be you.HIS indescribable property make people to feel/misunderstood--There is no God. Going towards HIM, with deepest love, belief, faith, dedication & practices(concentration, meditation etc.) for long, may make you to feel/know HIM--probably but mostly.
Heaven/Hell,Angels/devils, excesses/defficiencies, good/bad etc. may be a deviation from the "BALANCE" or from the "GOD".
GOD, being "omni" but still with indescribable & infinite properties, can do/know everything & remain present everywhere, in evey thing or being. He may effect such act or deeds himself, by forming/creating/concentrating-- HIM IN HIS complexes. OK? One out of those complexes may be you.HIS indescribable property make people to feel/misunderstood--There is no God. Going towards HIM, with deepest love, belief, faith, dedication & practices(concentration, meditation etc.) for long, may make you to feel/know HIM--probably but mostly.
Heaven/Hell,Angels/devils, excesses/defficiencies, good/bad etc. may be a deviation from the "BALANCE" or from the "GOD".
Sheesh! You learn how to kitten a thread and you're suddenly drunk with power!
But yea. It's about time for this thread...
Damn, that's good, Kumar. If you squint your eyes, it almost looks like English. Therefore, I've nominated you for the language prize.
It there anything wrong/indescribable in my post? Shouldn't be. I have taken great are.
What can be indescribable or couldn't yet be known in science?
I think the problem here kumar is that you are feeding whatever is your native language into one of those web based translators and then posting whatever the result is. Unfortunately the results of these things are often pure gibberish. For instance I typed someing into one once so I could get a German translation. Fortunately I was smart enough to have a German check it first and it seemed that I was asking if I could have sex with their cat while eating a watermelon. You need to be careful.
I suggest you ask an English speaking friend to check your translations before posting.
Helpfully yours ...
Btw, could you people understood the meaning behind my post or not? Or, should I consider that God's "to remain concealed", ominiscience & omnipotence properties are opreting & becoming valid, here?![]()
I have absolutely no idea at all what this means however I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
If you are suggesting that any god(s) or other supernatural entities exist then I'm afraid you are wasting your time here. Most of the members here, but by no means all, would suggest that, at best, you are deluded.
Then again, you may be making some subtle jest relating to my cat sex comment. It's a little hard to tell.
Let us think that, science could discover everything except one "Prime Force of all forces" alike mother of all forces for example. It ought to be there. Every gross thing & being can be considered as a "complex" of this prime force. However, someone at later date, one who have such qualities as of God, I mean in balance state, is considered as alike god, son of god etc. I mean, there can be some basic & gross forms of god. Whether then, every saying about God, is valid or not?
And this is another fancy way of saying what?
Let us think that, science could discover everything except one "Prime Force of all forces" alike mother of all forces for example. It ought to be there. Every gross thing & being can be considered as a "complex" of this prime force. However, someone at later date, one who have such qualities as of God, I mean in balance state, is considered as alike god, son of god etc. I mean, there can be some basic & gross forms of god. Whether then, every saying about God, is valid or not?
Every gross thing & being can be considered as a "complex" of this prime force.
Temporal huh? With respect to what?It's not FANCY. If there's no TIME, how do I define "when" it is ? It's a language barrier due to the fact that EVERYTHING we know is temporal.
Temporal huh? With respect to what?