• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program UFO'S

You don't know anyone there at all. You didn't even know that Colonel Hart clearly said he could see the lighthouse. You simply made up a whole lot of crap to push your "UFOs are real" fantasy. :p
To be fair, UFOs are real. People see objects they can't immediately identify all the time. Lighthouses, for example.
 
I know airmen who were there and they have confirmed to me the events as well.
Yes, and how is this relevant? They thought they saw UFOs. Right. But the UFO's do not get real because some people believe in them.

There is much more that I know about UFOs and have ATC recordings and transcripts, declassified government documents, testimonies, and yes, even my former base, Hill AFB, Utah, was involved in investigations that centered around flying saucers that dismantled our Minuteman missiles in the field. One of the officers who wrote a letter regarding one of the UFO incidents at Malmstrom AFB was Lt. Col. Lewis Chase, who was the pilot of an RB-47 that was chased by a UFO over multiple states.
Events such as these point to equipment failure or misreadings, not very good evidence for UFOs.

Currently, the government is declassifying its UFO files, which are now available under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The government knew the objects were not of this world, which the Air Force acknowledged in its 1948 EOTS report, ATIC, Wright-Patterson AFB, that the objects were "Interplanetary Spaceships." The Air Force confirmed once again in its 1952 intelligence report that objects were not of this world, which was around the time frame when the Air Force ordered its pilots to shoot down flying saucers.
This is completely laughable. How on Earth could they identify "Interplanetary Spaceships" that nobody has ever seen before? Even officials can have rampant imaginations.
 
"While in Rendlesham Forest, our security team observed a light that looked like a large eye, red in color, moving through the trees.

So you can see lights through the trees.
If you can see lights through the trees, why can't you see the lighthouse light through the trees?
 
So you can see lights through the trees.
If you can see lights through the trees, why can't you see the lighthouse light through the trees?

From the East Gate to the eastern edge of the forest is a 1 mile wide. Col. Halt and his team were able to see the lighthouse light beam because they were near the eastern section of the forest which faces the lighthouse.

Since the Rendlesham forest was very thick and a mile wide is why there were no reports of light beams from the lighthouse reported by guards at the East Gate prior to December 26, 1980.

Let's do a review and take into an account it is a mile from the edge of the forest near the East Gate to the eastern edge facing the lighthouse and trying to shine a light beam through a mile of thick forest won't happen.

ren_eastgrd1981.jpg
 
Last edited:
The US Navy just confirmed these UFO videos are the real deal

The US Navy has finally acknowledged footage purported to show UFOs hurtling through the air. And while officials said they don't know what the objects are, they're not indulging any hints either.

The objects seen in three clips of declassified military footage are "unidentified aerial phenomena," Navy spokesperson Joe Gradisher confirmed to CNN.

The clips, released between December 2017 and March 2018 by To The Stars Academy of Arts & Sciences, appear to show fast-moving, oblong objects captured by advanced infrared sensors.

In footage from 2004, sensors lock on a target as it flies before it accelerates out of the left side of the frame, too quickly for the sensors to relocate it.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/18/politics/navy-confirms-ufo-videos-trnd/index.html


UFOs are real, videos should never have been released: US Navy

The US Navy confirmed the authenticity of a series of three videos about UFO sightings recently and said that the videos should never have been made public.

The authenticity of UFO (Unidentified Flying Objects) sightings has been the topic of much debate for innumerable years. Now, it has come forward that the existence of UFOs maybe true and the US Navy confirms it.

In the second video, a Tic Tac shaped object was spotted around the coast of California in 2004 descending from 60,000 feet to 50 feet in a matter of seconds. It even created a disturbance on water which was the size of a football field, the report said.

This is the first time that the existence of UFOs has been confirmed by the navy with an official statement.

https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-...have-been-released-us-navy-1600711-2019-09-19

Which reminds me to the Motion Study report.

USAF UFO REPORTS

"Captain Edward J.Ruppelt, former chief of Project Blue Book, has confirmed the existence of four important documents that should be noted. In 1948, in a "Top Secret" estimate, the (Air Technical Intelligence Center, Wright-Patterson AFB) concluded that UFOs were interplanetary spaceships.

In 1952, an Air Force Intelligence analysis of UFO maneuvers brought the same conclusion... interplanetary."

MANEUVERED MOTION AND "INTELLIGENT CONTROL

Following the nearly year-long 1952 UFO sighting wave in which there were repeated instances of jet interceptors chasing after UFOs that also showed on radar, the Central Intelligence Agency convened the so-called Robertson Panel to evaluate the data. Among the presentations made to the scientific panel was one by Dewey J. Fournet (USAF, Ret.) who had worked with scientific analysts conducting a rigorous motion analysis study of hardcore unexplained cases.

Edward J. Ruppelt, former Chief of the Air Force Project Blue Book investigation, later reported that the study was "very hot and very controversial...[it] was hot because it wasn't official and the reason it wasn't official was because it was so hot. It concluded that UFOs were interplanetary spaceships."

Air Force analysts had reached this conclusion before. Project Sign in 1948 had issued a Top Secret Estimate of the Situation drawing the same conclusion. (Hall, 1964, p. 110) But both times outside scientific consultants, on the basis of what were arguably superficial and excessively skeptical reviews, disputed the conclusion. (Hall, 1988, pp. 155-163)

Many of these jet interception cases included a sort of "cat-and-mouse" behavior on the part of the UFOs, pulling away from the pursuing jets and then slowing down until they caught up again. This behavior has been repeated throughout the history of UFOs, and is one of the many indicators of intelligence behind the phenomenon. Case after case can be cited of UFOs apparently playing interactive games with (a) military aircraft.

The next step in the study, Fournet explained, was to find out where they came from. "Earthlings" were eliminated, leaving the final answer - spacemen.

http://www.nicap.org/motionstudy/motionstudy_ruppelt_orig.htm
 
From the East Gate to the eastern edge of the forest is a 1 mile wide. Col. Halt and his team were able to see the lighthouse light beam because they were near the eastern section of the forest which faces the lighthouse.
So why did you previously lie. forge that photograph and say the lighthouse was shielded from the forest?

Why have you continuously lied?
:p

We have Colonel Halt, in the forest, recording himself talking, looking at the lighthouse saying it winks on and off at the same rotation speed as the lighthouse light rotated? :p

You keep running away from that question, as you are a liar.
 
You are an idiot. You spent four days lying and claiming the lighthouse could not be seen by Colonel Halt and the guards and then you posted Colonel's 2010 affidavit saying he could see the lighthouse light.


Col Halt was near the eastern section of the Rendlesham forest when he stated they could see the lighthouse light beam. At the point where he made his observation, he, and his team were separated by 1 mile of thick forest between them and the East Gate.
 
Col Halt was near the eastern section of the Rendlesham forest when he stated they could see the lighthouse light beam. .
You are lying again.

Where does Colonel Hart ever say the word "lighthouse" on his recording, he made on the night? He didn't know it was a lighthouse until the police told him,

Why do you lie so much?
:p
 

Attachments

  • Rabbit forged photo.jpg
    Rabbit forged photo.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 1
Air traffic controllers have now come forward and verified they lost tracked a UFO over the Rendlesham Forest in the location where Col Halt conducted his investigation .

You are lying again.

"The senior operations officer on duty at RAF Watton that night was Squadron Leader Derek Coumbe. In 2003 he recalled for BBC Radio 4 that several calls had come through from Bentwaters asking them if they were seeing anything unusual in the Bentwaters and Woodbridge area. “We scrutinized the radar time and time again completely, and kept a watch on it through the whole period when these phone calls were going on and nothing was seen. Nothing at all,” Coumbe told the BBC. (Thanks to Dave Clarke for the transcript. See also under the heading “Radar and Radiation” on this page from Clarke’s website.)"
http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham8.htm
 
I was attached to the 2952nd CLSS, Hill AFB, UT, home of OOAMA which investigated incidents where saucers had shutdown our Minuteman missiles in the field.

Did Luis Elizondo interview you? No? Why not?

(Well that's because you just made that story up)


Oh.... by the way, Luis Elizondo has admitted at "On to the Stars Academy" that he wasn't the manager of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, because it was run by the DIA while he was employed by the Office for the Secretary of Defense.

Do you lie as much as he does?
:p
 
Yes, and how is this relevant? They thought they saw UFOs. Right. But the UFO's do not get real because some people believe in them.

You are correct, but we have lots of data from satellites, radar, ELINT systems, deep space surveillance radars, ATC communications, physical trace evidence, etc.

Events such as these point to equipment failure or misreadings, not very good evidence for UFOs.


Equipment failures have been rejected in the such cases. For an example, in the JAL 1628 case, there are communication tapes and ATC transcripts where military and civilian controllers were warning the aircrew of the B-747 by a a gigantic UFO larger than a ship. 2 1/2 months later in the general region, an Air Force KC-135 was in formation with a gigantic UFO the size of a ship, which was reported by the aircrew. The communication tape between ATC and the aircrew is now available to the public.

This is completely laughable. How on Earth could they identify "Interplanetary Spaceships" that nobody has ever seen before? Even officials can have rampant imaginations.

The advanced technology exhibited by the objects that is unknown to mankind. Another clear example is where our space surveillance systems track them as they enter Earth's atmosphere from deep space. According to DSP surveillance satellite engineers of Aero Jet, their own DSP satellites have tracked the objects in space and in one case, a DSP detected a UFO with its star tracker as the UFO headed toward Earth from deep space. The object then slowed down as it rounded to within a few miles of the DSP before heading back into deep space and that incident occurred in 1984. The UFOs in such cases are code named: "Fastwalkers."

Even Project Mogul and Skyhook balloon scientist were tracking the objects in space and even they were reporting tracking flying saucers. One of them was Charles B. Moore, who headed Project Mogul. You can read the reports here and notice in one official report that objects were seen hovering 200 miles above Earth.

MCLAUGH1.jpg


MCLAUGH2.jpg


Alamogordo_UFOs_8_47.gif



HOW SCIENTISTS TRACKED A FLYING SAUCER
by
Commander Robert B. McLaughlin, USN


On a bright, clear Sunday morning in April, 1949, a detachment of Navy men and a group of scientists released a balloon from a point 57 miles northwest of the White Sands Proving Ground base.

They were interested in getting weather data from the upper atmosphere, and as the balloon rose, they charted its flight as usual with a theodolite and a stop watch. There were five observers in all; four of them coordinating the instrument data. One followed the balloon through the theodolite's telescope. One called off the readings. One recorded them, and the fourth man held the watch.

Shortly after the balloon was aloft west of the observation point, the theodolite operator swung his instrument rapidly to the east.

A strange object, seen by everyone present, had crossed the path of the balloon. The instrument man, confused, had followed it. Swiftly, one of the scientists grabbed the theodolite and began tracking the missile.

An accurate plot of the object's course was recorded. Analyzing this data later, I can state definitely that:

1. The object, viewed in cross section, was elliptical in shape.

2. It was about 105 feet in diameter.

3. It was flying at an altitude of approximately 56 miles. (This was determined by a ballistics expert. An object at a lower altitude on this particular bright day could not have fitted the data taken. For security reasons, I cannot go deeper into this method of calculating altitude.)

4. Its speed was about 5 miles per second.

5. At the end of its trajectory, it swerved abruptly upward, altering its angle of elevation by 5 degrees -- corresponding to an increase in altitude of about 25 miles -- in a period of 10 seconds. Rough calculation indicates that a force of more that 20 G's (20 times the pull of gravity) would be required to produce this elevation in this time.

6. The object was visible for 60 seconds.

7. It disappeared at an elevation of 29 degrees.

https://www.nicap.org/true-mc.htm
As mentioned earlier, my own base in Vietnam was overflown by a UFO and after my tour, I was sent to Hill AFB, which conducted its own investigations where flying saucers were disabling our Minuteman missiles in the field, and we were the deport for those missiles.

How many people today are aware that UFOs overflew Washington D.C. in 1952 where Air Force jets were scrambled? How many are aware that the U.S. Army finally admitted to its Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit (IPU) whose mission was to recover downed UFOs. The unit was supported by Project Moon Dust and Operation Blue Fly.

The files of the IPU are now in the hands of the USAF and you can make an inquiry under the Freedom of Information Act for additional information on the Army's Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit.

How about the Roswell incident?

AF ROSWELL STUDY CONTRIBUTOR ADMITS "IT WAS ET!"

The Lt. Colonel who was a major contributor to the Air Force's official 1997 study that concluded that the Roswell ET crash of 1947 is a "myth"- now states that the Air Force's Roswell report is itself a lie. The Colonel goes further to state that what he really believes to be true is that aliens actually did crash to Earth decades ago! He adds that he was "used" and that the the author of the Air Force report "was on a mission" with no interest in discovering what really happened at Roswell.

Amazingly, Madson believes that an extraterrestrial crash actually had happened - and that the bodies were stored for a period of time at Wright Patterson! He bases this on the fact that he himself had served at Wright Patterson in the early 1950's -before going to Holloman AFB to conduct the crash dummy tests. He personally had heard -just a few years after the Roswell event- directly from "others who would have been positioned to know" that there was a "very secure facility" at the base that served as the storage place for the alien bodies that were recovered from a crash sometime before he began employment at Wright.

General Arthur E. Exon, Commanding Officer, Wright-Patterson AFB


(RUCU) (C&S, p. 191, 194)

"...They knew they had something new in their hands. The metal and material was unknown to anyone I talked to. Whatever they found, I never heard what the results were. A couple of guys thought it might be Russian, but the overall consensus was that the pieces were from space. Everyone from the White House on down knew that what we had found was not of this world within 24 hours of our finding it. ...Roswell was the recovery of a craft from space."


June Crain, Wright-Patterson AFB Secretary Interview

http://www.ufocasebook.com/pdf/crainclarkson.pdf


The 'UFO Letter Of Senator Barry Goldwater

Barry Goldwater
United States Senate
Washington, D.C.[postcode]

March 28, 1975

Mr. Schlomo Arnon
U.C.D.A. Experimental College
308 Westwood Plaza
Los Angeles, California 90024

Dear Mr. Arnon:

The subject of UFOs is one that has interested me
for some long time. About ten or twelve years ago
I made an effort to find out what was in the building
at Wright Patterson Air Force Base where the information
is stored that has been collected by the Air Force, and
I was understandably denied this request. It is
still classified above Top Secret. I have, however,
heard that there is a plan under way to release some,
if not all, of this material in the near future. I'm
just as anxious to see this material as you are, and I
hope we will not have to wait too much longer.

Sincerely

[Signature]


Majestic+Twelve+Project,+Annual+Report,+Summer+1952.png
 
Last edited:
Here is the photo where you forged the arrows and claimed it was blocked from shining on the forest.

Here is the post where you lied and displayed the photo.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12820780&postcount=503

The path in front of the shield leads to Orford not the forest, you liar.

Why do you lie and forge evidence all the time?

You have no case, because a beam of light from the lighthouse cannot been seen through a mile-thick forest.
 
Did Luis Elizondo interview you? No? Why not?

(Well that's because you just made that story up)


Oh.... by the way, Luis Elizondo has admitted at "On to the Stars Academy" that he wasn't the manager of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, because it was run by the DIA while he was employed by the Office for the Secretary of Defense.

Do you lie as much as he does?
:p

You lost that case as well because it is well-documented that Luis Elizondo was head of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program.

Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program

Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program
Formation 2007
Dissolved 2012
Type United States governmental study
Legal status Secret program, formally disbanded
Purpose Study of unidentified flying objects
Leader Luis Elizondo
Budget
$22 million over 5 years

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Aerospace_Threat_Identification_Program

https://www.livescience.com/65596-ufo-pentagon-history-channel.html

https://www.history.com/shows/unidentified-inside-americas-ufo-investigation
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom