• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The Electric Comet Theory Part IV/SAFIRE

Status
Not open for further replies.
oh deary me, reality check lost the plot.

Can you see your contridiction here rc, jd11, lukrak?

Big Red Ball is a three-meter-wide hollow sphere, with a strong magnet at its center and various probes inside. The researchers pump helium gas in, ionize it to create a plasma, and then apply an electric current that, along with the magnetic field, stirs the plasma, creating a near-perfect mimic of the spinning plasma and electromagnetic fields of the sun

Just saying SAFIRE was bagged out for doing basically the same thing. Should have seen you mob spit the dummy.

:D
 
oh deary me, reality check lost the plot.

Can you see your contridiction here rc, jd11, lukrak?

Big Red Ball is a three-meter-wide hollow sphere, with a strong magnet at its center and various probes inside. The researchers pump helium gas in, ionize it to create a plasma, and then apply an electric current that, along with the magnetic field, stirs the plasma, creating a near-perfect mimic of the spinning plasma and electromagnetic fields of the sun

Just saying SAFIRE was bagged out for doing basically the same thing. Should have seen you mob spit the dummy.

:D
 
The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity of citing mainstream science irrelevant to his demented cult's electric comet and Sun.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the research he linked to is part of the mainstream explaining solar activity!
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment has a metal ball for the Sun and has nothing to do with the real Sun or this science which has no metal ball. Over 5 years running now and the demented SAFIRE experiment has no published results about the Sun.

Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment having electric currents does not make it science.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment is not "doing basically the same thing" - it is a deluded fantasy about the surface features of the Sun.

This is a rational scientific experiment to model the solar environment outside of the Sun. A laboratory model for the Parker spiral and magnetized stellar winds my emphasis added.
The Parker spiral is the shape of the interplanetary magnetic field from the Sun.
 
Last edited:
The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.

Sol88's usual insanity of citing mainstream science irrelevant to his demented cult's electric comet and Sun.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the research he linked to is part of the mainstream explaining solar activity!
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment has a metal ball for the Sun and has nothing to do with the real Sun or this science which has no metal ball. Over 5 years running now and the demented SAFIRE experiment has no published results about the Sun.

Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment having electric currents does not make it science.
Sol88's usual insane lies - the demented SAFIRE experiment is not "doing basically the same thing" - it is a deluded fantasy about the surface features of the Sun.

This is a rational scientific experiment to model the solar environment outside of the Sun. A laboratory model for the Parker spiral and magnetized stellar winds my emphasis added.
The Parker spiral is the shape of the interplanetary magnetic field from the Sun.
 
Last edited:
Oh poor deluded reality check.

:o

How do they power this thing?

Back in your hole champ.
 
Oh poor deluded reality check.

:o

How do they power this thing?

Back in your hole champ.

They are modelling the solar wind. Not the Sun. I thought that was quite obvious. There are reasons why it is difficult to form a star in a lab. And all this is nothing to do with the complete failure of the asinine ec woo. If you want to resurrect the electric sun woo thread, then do so. Just make sure that you've figured out where all the neutrinos come from, and can explain the energy spectrum of said neutrinos, that show it to match p-p chain fusion. As predicted by real scientists, and as not predicted by electric universe idiots.
 
Why are you still posting?

You've admitted that you do not have any way of fitting observed data with your 'model' and that you are purely acting on faith in the hope that eventually nature will behave opposite of the way it does now.

Even if, and that is a very big if given your cherry picking and misinterpretation of scientific papers, there are gaps in the mainstream model, your completely wrong model will not replace it.
 
The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Sol88's utter insanity that just because two experiments are powered by electricity that they are the same. So in his brain, the Large Hadron Collider should be the same experiment as the demented SAFIRE experiment :jaw-dropp!
 
Last edited:
Whilst waiting for the raft of new papers, i thought id throw this in here for context.

The comet Ceres.

Search for water outgassing of (1) Ceres near perihelion

The two main mechanisms believed to produce such amounts of water molecules are sublimation of water ice recently exposed by impacts or landslides, and sputtering from SEP events. The first mechanism does not seem to be confirmed by this work, because it would imply a correlation between the heliocentric distance and the observations of water molecules, which is contradictory to our non-detection performed just before perihelion.
 
The usual lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years

The usual insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. already addressed over the last 10 years.
The insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn by Sol88 linking him with demented dogma, etc.
Sol88's lies about the demented SAFIRE experiment about the Sun and a scientific experiment about the solar wind and Parker spiral

Usual insane lies from Sol88 - Ceres is a dwarf planet and this is a thread on comets :jaw-dropp!

Search for water outgassing of Ceres near perihelion was a search for the cause of sublimating water ices on the dwarf planet Ceres and comes to a rational, scientific conclusion:
Conclusions. Our observations support the idea that heliocentric distance (i.e., the sublimation of water ice) does not play a major role in the water emission from Ceres. This production rate could be either related to SEP events or to other mechanisms, possibly of endogenic origin.
...
The lack of any clear correlation between Ceres’ heliocentric distance and observed water vapor production rates does not favor the hypothesis of a water vapor emission created by sublimation of water ice analogous to comets (or, at least, if water vapor is emitted by this process, which is probable to some extent, then it is below the detection level).
This paper shows that Cere's activity is not analogous to cometary activity because there is no evidence of variation with Cere's orbit. That leaves solar energetic particles (SEP) or other rational, scientific mechanisms.

None of Sol88's demented cult's dogma about comets, imaginary enormous solar electric fields and electric discharge machining insanity here.
 
Last edited:
Second sentence in the abstract:

Ceres was the target of NASA’s Dawn spacecraft for 3.5 yr, which achieved a detailed characterization of the dwarf planet.
Sol88's cult already have the insanity that main-belt comets are electric comets where the insanity is that the hundreds of thousands of asteroids with similarly eccentric orbits have to be comets - and they are not :eye-poppi!

Sol88 wants to make this even more insane by making a dwarf planet in the asteroid belt with really low eccentricity one of his cult's electric comets. I suspect that may push up the number of asteroids that must be comets in their fantasy into the millions!

And what about Pluto - a dwarf plant with no cometary activity and higher eccentricity than Ceres that Sol88's cult would expect to be comet in his new fantasy. Ditto for Eris, Haumea, and Makemake?
 
Whilst waiting for the raft of new papers, i thought id throw this in here for context.

The comet Ceres.


Calvin, presenting his science report to his grade school class:

"Dusk! With a creepy, tingling sensation, you hear the fluttering of leathery wings! Bats! With glowing red eyes and glistening fangs, these unspeakable giant bugs drop onto..."

Entire grade school class, in unison:

"BATS AREN'T BUGS!!"
 
You’re missing the point.

Sol88 has been silent for a while because he’s been busy doing sophisticated calculations and making estimates.

I think he’s on the cusp of being able to show that a giant lightning bolt blasted rock, forming the Grand Canyon (or maybe the Rift Valley). The blasted rock was sent into solar orbit, coalescing to form Ceres. Sol88’s calculations show that the relative abundance of various mineral species, and water, for Ceres closely matches that of the blasted rock, once you take account of the solar wind and changes wrought by the bolts. Better: the total mass is consistent! And the cosmic event was witnessed by native Americans, and Australian Aborigines, about 20,000 years ago. :D

Sol88 is working on writing a paper to report these remarkable results, planning to submit it Icarus, hoping for a nice Xmas pressie. :p
 
:D

dichotomy??

From the paper

Conclusions. Our observations support the idea that heliocentric distance (i.e., the sublimation of water ice) does not play a major role in the water emission from Ceres. This production rate could be either related to SEP events or to other mechanisms, possibly of endogenic origin.

so...

Is Ceres mostly rock or mostly ice?

:rolleyes:
 
You’re missing the point.

Sol88 has been silent for a while because he’s been busy doing sophisticated calculations and making estimates.

I think he’s on the cusp of being able to show that a giant lightning bolt blasted rock, forming the Grand Canyon (or maybe the Rift Valley). The blasted rock was sent into solar orbit, coalescing to form Ceres. Sol88’s calculations show that the relative abundance of various mineral species, and water, for Ceres closely matches that of the blasted rock, once you take account of the solar wind and changes wrought by the bolts. Better: the total mass is consistent! And the cosmic event was witnessed by native Americans, and Australian Aborigines, about 20,000 years ago. :D

Sol88 is working on writing a paper to report these remarkable results, planning to submit it Icarus, hoping for a nice Xmas pressie. :p

:rolleyes:

Lets discuss

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons



Keen?


Perhaps you could tell this eejit who's been banging on for quite some time on comets having double layers in operation, on what a sheath is?

Go ahead, bet you wont/cant though.

Tusenfem's too scared to even discuss Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase


And I have no idea why he's too scared?

Is this new to cometary scientist?

Expected if comets are plasma phenomenon.

Anywhoo, so looking forward to the new papers.

Anyone here have any idea on when they will released?
 
Last edited:
Once again here you are posting about a theory that fails to predict even the simplest parts of the observed universe while focusing on obscure and minor effects as if that makes the total failure in some way something you can gloss over.

We see electrons and protons moving trough space.
We see them moving in the same direction with the same force accelerating them.

Your 'theory' predicts that the opposite of what we observer to happen should happen.
Therefore your theory is wrong and until you somehow manage to come up with a model that would explain this glaring error there is no need to discuss anything else.

You are here again, so do you have that model?
 
:rolleyes:

Lets discuss

RPC-MIP observations at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko explained by a model including a sheath and two populations of electrons



Keen?


Perhaps you could tell this eejit who's been banging on for quite some time on comets having double layers in operation, on what a sheath is?

Go ahead, bet you wont/cant though.

Tusenfem's too scared to even discuss Unusually high magnetic fields in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its high-activity phase


And I have no idea why he's too scared?

Is this new to cometary scientist?

Expected if comets are plasma phenomenon.

Anywhoo, so looking forward to the new papers.

Anyone here have any idea on when they will released?
I’ve just one word for you, Sol88: EDM.

In the Electric Comet Theory (or model), EDM is central.

If you think “a sheath and two populations of electrons”and “unusually high magnetic fields” are consistent with EDM, quantitatively, go ahead and show us. Then write a paper on this, and get it published. Await a call from Stockholm :p
 
Tusenfem's

stone dead tired of EC nonsense.

but if you want to know, the unusual high magnetic field is the result of a CME and CIR interacting with the induced magnetosphere of 67P
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom