• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
So: hank hill. You have asked us to analyze the OP and find out what this guy is all about. I believe we have done so, though prob not in the way you were hoping for. Any paragraphs you'd like to add?
 
Yes. All you've done is said he's Nicolas Sequeira and that I'm him, the latter of which is false. You have not examined this series. You have not spotted intriguing details. You have posted irrelevant videos, none of which are even slightly related to the video at hand. You have ignored all attempts to keep this thread on topic. This thread has driven into the trash pail.
 
I already made a thread on Science 2.0, but it was derailed. THIS thread will be more stringent, with an episode-by-episode overview for anyone who wants to follow the satirical webseries Science 2.0. Anybody who does not like Science 2.0 or finds him boring can go to the other thread. THIS thread is strictly for discussion of Science 2.0 We'll start with Episode 1. What are your thoughts? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmKNKZN9l9w&t=567s
 
hank hill said:
Yes. All you've done is said he's Nicolas Sequeira and that I'm him, the latter of which is false. You have not examined this series. You have not spotted intriguing details. You have posted irrelevant videos, none of which are even slightly related to the video at hand. You have ignored all attempts to keep this thread on topic. This thread has driven into the trash pail.
Click to expand...

We examined the series till we were bored to death with it, which fortunately took only a few seconds. Nothing remotely of interest was found, and further viewing was unwarranted. If you find something interesting, please post it and maybe some discussion will arise. Stop asking us to do everything for you.

You asked us to find out something about the guy, and you even posed yourself that three of them were the same guy. We concur, and further pose that there is also a fourth alter ego.

So, from your 17 year old perspective as a Chicago accountant born in 1985 (totally not Nick from Denver), what would you like to add?
 
hank hill said:
I'm not 17 and I'm not Science 2.0. I'm interested in Science 2.0.
Click to expand...

Check your profile. You entered yo age, hommie. 17 tender years of age.

Why did you deny being Nicky before anyone said anything remotely like that? Sounds like you've gotten that accusation before and jumped the gun a little.

eta: you also spell your Nicky Nick's name out in full every time. Kind of like you are calling attention to it.
 
Last edited:
Are you freaking kidding me? Merge this junk with the other junk thread. You want to discuss it? Start yapping.
 
The other thread is 10 pages long. Time for a fresh start.

Episode 1 uses a Star Trek beam toy. Also, the porch light works in this one whereas it doesn't in other episodes, and Science 2.0 has a peculiar habit here of holding random objects, such as a VHS copy of Meet The Parents.
 
hank hill said:
If I said I'm 17, why do you think I'm born in 1985? I'm confused.
Click to expand...

Dude, you suck at this alter-ego thing. You entered your birthdate when registering, which shows on your profile that you didn't think to make hidden. Then you entered in the 'about me' section that you were born in 1985 and that you are an accountant.

You are only metaphorically confused on this matter.

eta: pssst...you might want to make some profile changes now. That's what a competent catfish would do. You're welcome.
 
Last edited:
hank hill said:
Oh. I'm 34, I don't know why I said I was 17. I'd change that but I don't know how.
Click to expand...

You were entering your registration information while forgetting to stay in character, evidently not knowing it would be publicly posted. So you would have entered 2002 for your birthyear, hommes. This was no typo; that's a lot of numbers to be off. Also, this is not the first time in the thread it was pointed out to you that you claimed to be 17, either. You did not act surprised to hear it then either.

Catfishing is hard, yo.
 
hank hill said:
The other thread is 10 pages long. Time for a fresh start.

Episode 1 uses a Star Trek beam toy. Also, the porch light works in this one whereas it doesn't in other episodes, and Science 2.0 has a peculiar habit here of holding random objects, such as a VHS copy of Meet The Parents.
Click to expand...

So? What's the interesting part?
 
No. That's not anywhere near Science 2.0. I've made a new thread on Science 2.0 hat'll hopefulyl be treated with more respect, if you're interested in theorizing there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom