William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 27,493
I don't agree with that at all.The mostly likely is the DA felt the evidence against Smolett was not strong enough to convict,but if this is the case why didn't the DA just say "Insufficent Evidence?'.
If I had to guess I would say that the prosecutors decided that it is stupid to chase this obvious hoaxer any longer. Everyone already knows he is guilty. And in the end, it's really a minor thing. A fake hate crime without any real injuries other than scratches made by Smollett himself. And 16 charges? Why, when it's just one single hoax?