• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

2020 Democratic Candidates Tracker

Status
Not open for further replies.
How much damage has Biden done to preteen girls in total, though?

Nice how you compare your entire imagined Trump body of work to a single Biden video clip..

You really should try a lot harder to conceal your confirmation bias.

Or maybe not. I predict most everyone in this thread will take your side, for some totally mysterious and inscrutable and not at all misogynistic reason.

Seriously? You're acting as if Biden had sex with preteen girls.
 
That at least makes sense, the parties can make their own rules for their own primaries. But a state can't dictate to other states.

The Democratic party DOESN'T want a populous state to begin the campaign season since in those states elections are/were thought to be won more on who has the money to advertise on TV. By having it in New Hampshire and Iowa, it is thought that it is more ffocused on ideas and grass roots. Whether this is actually the case is arguable.
 
The Democratic party DOESN'T want a populous state to begin the campaign season since in those states elections are/were thought to be won more on who has the money to advertise on TV. By having it in New Hampshire and Iowa, it is thought that it is more ffocused on ideas and grass roots. Whether this is actually the case is arguable.

That's mostly an after the fact rationale for leaving the current system in place. As I mentioned earlier, the primaries were quite different only 50 years ago; they were nowhere near as important as they are today.
 
That's mostly an after the fact rationale for leaving the current system in place. As I mentioned earlier, the primaries were quite different only 50 years ago; they were nowhere near as important as they are today.

You might be right. But that is the rationale I've heard debated about from some very prominent members of the party.
 
How much damage has Biden done to preteen girls in total, though?

Nice how you compare your entire imagined Trump body of work to a single Biden video clip..

You really should try a lot harder to conceal your confirmation bias.

Or maybe not. I predict most everyone in this thread will take your side, for some totally mysterious and inscrutable and not at all misogynistic reason.

Given the number of women who've come forward, whether former beauty pageant contestants or associates of Trump's businesses who've complained of harassment and bullying, and on the other side you've got total speculation and shocked sensibilities, I'm willing to bet I'm not wrong and Biden is just another corny old politician trying to look presentable for the cameras.

Just let me know when Biden gets accused of sexual harassment by these girls/women he was a bit touchy with. He'll almost be on Trump's level then.
 
The Democratic party DOESN'T want a populous state to begin the campaign season since in those states elections are/were thought to be won more on who has the money to advertise on TV. By having it in New Hampshire and Iowa, it is thought that it is more ffocused on ideas and grass roots. Whether this is actually the case is arguable.

This is one reason why Nate Silver said Delaware would be a better candidate. It has a more representative demographic AND it is smalller.
 
Trump probably has done more damage to adult women than Biden did that preteen-looking girl, so I dunno why you keep jabbing at Biden for these "creepy" moments.

You can't possibly think that's the only pre-teen girl he's molested can you?

How about spending 10 minutes watching footage of a large number of very young girls being molested by Uncle Joe. If you check the body language of several of the girls, they are extremely uncomfortable about his touching, whispering and kissing.

Go on, educate yourself about Joe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MVWCblqIY4

Heck, could be they're all faked, but they look like fairly official videos, so it'd be very easy to check.

Nice how you compare your entire imagined Trump body of work to a single Biden video clip..

I'll take the blame for that - I thought his deeds were widely-enough known that single .gif would do it.

It's so much more forceful in full, though - some of the girls are horrified, and if he touched up my daughter like that, I'd be having some very harsh words with him at the very least.

I repeat: Biden is far worse than Trump, or did I dream up that whole "Me too" thing?

Seriously? You're acting as if Biden had sex with preteen girls.

May as well have. Some of those girls are disgusted by it. There are a couple of clear instances where he looks to be rubbing his penis on them, so he's not too far off. May have come in his pants for all I know - he clearly loves it and they don't.

Are you seriously defending his behaviour? Or were you just unaware of the scope of his offending?

Or, you can also show me where these videos differ from the official tapes held. You have a freedom of information act in America that allows public to view official archives, I believe. If they're faked, show me and I'll retract every word.

Why do you think not a single Republican has mentioned this? They'll be hoping he gets nominated so they can utterly destroy him. Even I could make a good attack ad out of a couple of those girls' reactions. He wouldn't get a single vote in the general election - outside of blindly loyalist idiots.
 
....I love Biden's personality but he's more conservative than I'd like and I worry about his age.

Biden's 77. That's just too old. If electability is your prime judgement factor - as you say it is - then Biden's just too old to excite the younger crowd, and by younger I mean those under 50! The Dems need someone who can counter the passion of the far right with ideas that resonate with the middle class. I just don't think he's the go-to guy any more. He's past his political prime.

Note, though, that I really like the guy. He'd be a good president but he would not be a good candidate.
 
You can't possibly think that's the only pre-teen girl he's molested can you?

How about spending 10 minutes watching footage of a large number of very young girls being molested by Uncle Joe. If you check the body language of several of the girls, they are extremely uncomfortable about his touching, whispering and kissing.

Go on, educate yourself about Joe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MVWCblqIY4

Heck, could be they're all faked, but they look like fairly official videos, so it'd be very easy to check.

Yes I have seen many of those clips, most memorable being the one with Ashton Carter's wife.

You have a very loose standard of "molested".
 
How about evidence from within Trump's own re-election machine?

For which you cited this:
If there’s a head wind pushing, it’s probably pushing the Democrat Party further to the radical left, rather than pushing the president into a one-term [presidency],” said Bryan Lanza, an adviser to Trump’s 2016 campaign and transition. “Nothing’s really changed for us. It’s still going to be the same binary choice between a Republican set of principles as opposed to a socialist Democratic set of principles. And we’ll gladly take that choice.
which is an absolute crock of excrement.

Nobody but a blind partisan blowhard would mention the "radical left". That's just a GOP talking point that has no relation to reality. You blew it with that source, TA.

If Trump's data analysis - infinitely superior to the Dems' - is showing a shift left helps Trump, it ought to be absurdly obvious to anyone looking in.
Nonsense. Even the Republicans will admit that the Dems are ahead of them in the use of data analyses to target voters.

That women who have turned against Trump will vote for a candidate and party that is openly Socialist.
Jesus, TA, you've drunk the Koo0l-Aid. There is not a whiff of socialism in the Democratic platform. None of the candidates are Socialist (with a capital "S") INCLUDING Sanders.

To quote yourself: Laughably ignorant.

Three strikes and you're out, TA. You can't be this badly informed and still offer useful criticism of the 2020 campaign.
 
Last edited:
The funniest part about all of this is the huge talk of how divided America has become since Trump's election, yet the Dems seem to want to harden the divide by making the difference bigger than ever.

Once again, you're way off base because your assumptions are not valid. There is, in fact, no huge divide in the USA. The policies advocated by the Dems are widely endorsed by large margins of the general populace. That's a fact.

Where there's a large divide is by the extremest voices mostly on the right that are backed by a small portion of the populace but make an outsized level of noise. That noise, of course, generates controversy, which the TV bigwigs like because it draws eyes and, most importantly, ad revenue. Do you have any other explanation why Dump got so much free coverage in 2016?

The hard divide you cite is yet another example of where you've swallowed the Kool-Aid. To quote Dump, "Sad!"
 
There is no doubt in my mind that any other candidate for the Dems would have beaten Trump.

None? I can only conclude you are woefully out of touch with American politics. That's not a criticism because you are, as you noted, 10,000 miles away. Hell, you know more about American politics than I know about Australian.

However, I don't pontificate about Australian politics; you should consider the same.
 
I missed the memo where it said those two states can dictate to all the other states. The rest can do as they please, if those two wish to scramble to do theirs earlier they can certainly try, but I can't see how they could stop the other states from holding their own on whatever dates they like.

Yep. If they responded by pushing their votes even earlier they risk becoming irrelevant.
 
You can't possibly think that's the only pre-teen girl he's molested can you?

How about spending 10 minutes watching footage of a large number of very young girls being molested by Uncle Joe. If you check the body language of several of the girls, they are extremely uncomfortable about his touching, whispering and kissing.

Go on, educate yourself about Joe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MVWCblqIY4

Your source is Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars?

Mmmmmnnnnnaahhh!

Sorry, this is a skeptic's website, you're not going to get much traction with an innuendo-laden mash-up of pictures of "Creepy Uncle Joe" leering in official videos.

Of course, we've seen these videos before and they are not a good look. It's clear that the Trump Republicans would play these videos over and over again so they could be a PR disaster, but you need much better evidence than Infowars if you want skeptics to be convinced that "20,000 retweets" of some guy with an axe to grind means anything at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom