Fun fact: I served in a special operations airborne unit that deployed to former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, as part of the NATO intervention there.
And I appreciate your service, no matter how mundane you might describe it. I also appreciate the thoughtful reply you crafted here. I understand full-well how careful veterans tend to be in deflecting any praise or accolades for their service. I work with veterans and reservists every day and to a person they are in my experience overflowing with humility despite extraordinary capability.
I also understand that there are veterans of questionable character, too. It is sincerely douchey to lie about one's military service, and little to no better if it's a lie of omission in which someone else fills in unspoken details. There is no question that Phillips has been guilty of the latter, and probably also the former, on more than one occasion. As you also pointed out, he wasn't exactly a model reservist while he was servicing those HVACs.
I try not to put it that way, though, since it connotes a lot of experiences that I never actually had.
That is honorable of you. How do you describe it, though? In this reply you provided something like 6 or 7 sentences to explain, but surely you wouldn't go into all that if you were being asked in an interview "Are you a veteran?"
Phillips could have replied to that question over the years with something like "I was a Marine Corps Reservist stationed in California, 1972–1976" and maybe we wouldn't be having this discussion. Instead, he seems to have most often described himself as a "veteran from the Vietnam War era", which is evidently accurate, but douchey.
Why he chose to describe his service that way is to me a puzzle. I'm not convinced that he's been doing that to glom on to some greater prestige than he's due. For one, I actually find the former, more detailed description a lot more impressive than the vague Vietnam era stuff.
And why would he need greater stature? The dude is already a hero to the DAPL protestors. His activist-cred is sky high.
Most important, Phillips must know that claiming military cred he hadn't earned would be a one-way ticket to the dung heap of history in the eyes of veterans who saw combat. If he's trying to build stature for himself, claiming something he shouldn't in a television interview and pissing off every military family in the country is the worst possible approach, right? I mean, maybe he's just an idiot? That's not much better than a douchebag, I admit, but it might be a more parsimonious explanation.
As a former soldier myself, I'm offended at Phillips' misrepresentation of his service. I wish you wouldn't make excuses for it.
I understand, and I can't claim that I'm not making those excuses for him by positing additional excuses. I hope you can appreciate though that I am really just trying to make a good faith effort to better understand Phillips' claims. It's easy to jump on the bandwagon that he's a stolen-valor creep and therefore is lower than pond scum and has zero credibility. If I end up there, so be it. At this point, however, I still see room for nuance in Phillips' case.