theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
More and more admin functions can be done through a browser now, but the real work is automated via the API. If the software offers an API and you're still pointing and clicking, it's time to up your game.
Yep, I agree too. The browser-based stuff, PROPERLY DESIGNED, covers a lot more ground far more easily than hacking and testing a bunch of scripts together.I completely agree. Those with the chops can do amazing things with a command line. For most functions, the GUI serves the rest of us extremely well.
More and more admin functions are being done through a browser now, actually. I do pretty much everything in a browser except those few functions I still need to use AD for.
More and more admin functions can be done through a browser now, but the real work is automated via the API. If the software offers an API and you're still pointing and clicking, it's time to up your game.
A GUI is great for one-off work or things that don't need to be done often. Add one user to a system? Do it in the GUI. Add 2500? If you can't write a script to do that, some poor drone's going to spend a day or three with a spreadsheet, copying and pasting data. It will be error prone and a poor use of that person's time.
Command-line stuff is also great for things that happen in off hours when no-one's around to initiate and babysit the process. At home I have a job that runs hourly on my server to back up some files from my laptop, and another job that runs at 4:00 AM daily to copy the server's primary disc to a backup disc.
Here's one that gets me. We always ask for the Workstation Name, which is the same as the asset tracking number. It always has two letters, then some numbers, which vary according to the actual agency that owns the asset. Here's how it often goes.
Me: Okay, can I get you to read out your workstation name?
Them: Where do I find that?
Me: It's on a sticker on your computer, it starts with two letters followed by some numbers.
Them: Oh, does it start with TJ?
Me: That will be it.
Them: Okay. T J.
Me: ...
Me: ... ...
Me: ... ... ...
Me: ... ... ... ... go on.
Them: 123456.
Can't remember. Hey, it was a long time ago. I'm going to say "probably".
I'm going say, definitely not, in my case.
I'd been using all kinds of computers (too many to list) before I had to use a Mac for Statistics at uni.
When I couldn't find a button to eject the disc, I asked other students for help.
When they told me I had to drag it to the Trash can, I was utterly certain that they were trying to get me to delete all my files for a joke.
Eventually a Tutor came over and showed me the alternative methods for ejecting the disc. (Cloverleaf+E, or selecting something from a menu IIRC)
As did my XT in 1985 and my AT in 1986.My 386 certainly had a hard drive in '86.
As did my XT in 1985 and my AT in 1986.
5 for the XT. 20 for the AT.20 mega total capacity?
5 for the XT. 20 for the AT.
P as in psycho.G as in gila (If you don't know Spanish, I should tell you that it's pronounced like an English h).
See "Gila River, Arizona".
P as in pneumatic.
Do NOT remind me!So was it a 10 Mb and then the RLL controllers came out? Low level format via debug?