• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Red Baron Farms said:
Show me.
Click to expand...

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/Permeation082714.pdf

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/SunCellPaper.pdf

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/Hydrino-Blast-Power-Paper-050818.pdf

The catalysis reaction product was identified by Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence emission spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and MAS NMR.

The predicted molecular hydrino H2(1/4) was identified as a product of CIHT cells by MAS 1H NMR, electron-beam excitation emission spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and photoluminescence emission spectroscopy.

The predicted molecular hydrino H2(1/4) was identified as a product by Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence emission spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
 
markie said:
https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/Permeation082714.pdf

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/SunCellPaper.pdf

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/Hydrino-Blast-Power-Paper-050818.pdf

The catalysis reaction product was identified by Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence emission spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and MAS NMR.

The predicted molecular hydrino H2(1/4) was identified as a product of CIHT cells by MAS 1H NMR, electron-beam excitation emission spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and photoluminescence emission spectroscopy.

The predicted molecular hydrino H2(1/4) was identified as a product by Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence emission spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
Click to expand...
ok first one is the so called hydrino crystals which I already sourced to you a citation showing those same readings are found when certain materials undergo hydrogen embrittlement. You know? The text book source I gave you weeks ago? So that is meaningless.

Second one same thing. Third one the same. All are on some sort of metallic foil exposed to hydrogen. Yes it changes the foil. No it is not evidence of molecular hydrinos, just ordinary hydrogen embrittlement. We have been over this multiple times. These are not anomalous results when using a welder without the appropriate flux or shielding gasses and purposely adding moisture. In fact what Mills purposely does to supposedly increase hydrino production is precisely the exact opposite of what welders are taught to do to avoid hydrogen embrittlement. Coincidence? NOPE
Moving along....

You said that dihydrino gas could be isolated in liquid helium.

That makes it easy since obviously helium and dihydrino gas would have different boiling points. If you had liquid dihydrino and liquid helium mixture, it would be trivially easy to distill pure liquid dihydrino and since it is so cold, not have the storage issue. It could be analysed.

It would be a really easy way to confirm Mills claims. Trivially easy. So easy even a dumb farmer like me who knows all about hydrogen embrittlement because he is a terrible welder could follow it. (I might know a little about distilling a mixture of two liquids with different boiling points too, but that's on the hush hush;))

You said Mills did that. post#3503 This means he has or had a container of liquid dihydrino somewhere.

Show me. Patiently waiting.
 
Last edited:
JeanTate said:
As of today, we have to wait a mere 32 (62) days before the world has concrete, independent, evidence of the existence of a hydrino-powered generator. According to markie (though he may be having some doubts). And according to new to the ISF tip, there will be no more predictions.

Happy New Year, 2019, everyone! :)

Will this be THE YEAR? After, what, ~30 years or so waiting, will working prototypes be delivered to truly independent teams for testing (complete with relevant certificates from at least the NJ government, concerning safety etc)? Or will this be the year Mills is diagnosed with Alzheimer's, or suffers a massive heart attack (he's no spring chicken, after all)?

More mundanely, why 32 (62)?

Well, I'll post a link to markie's promise/prediction/hint (or whatever it's best characterized as) later. For now, let's say there's a little bit of leeway ... if THE GOOD NEWS breaks later today, it'll be tomorrow before I may write about it. And if it's released close to midnight in Hawaii ... :p
Click to expand...
As of today, we have to wait a mere 31 (61) days before the world has concrete, independent, evidence of the existence of a hydrino-powered generator. According to markie (though he may be having some doubts). And according to new to the ISF tlp, there will be no more predictions.

Well, we all know - and that includes markie, optiongeek, and tlp - that there will be no working prototype hyrdrino-based generators shipped from NJ to independent testing labs, by 2 March, 2019.

But when will the scam end?

Suppose Mills were to depart, suddenly; is there anyone among his acolytes who will pick up the torch? Is it reasonable to expect that markie, optiongeek, and/or tlp will take over?

I don't know how old Mills is, but assume he was 30 when he started this scam, 30 years ago. He would be now entering a period when illnesses and deaths start to rise, perhaps exponentially.

Of course, he will not be felled by cancer, as he has cabinets full of revolutionary cancer drugs ... though perhaps all the hydrinos and dihydrinos he's been breathing will cause a variant of lung cancer that his miracle drugs won't work on.

Alzheimer's is unlikely to strike for another decade or two, so the scam will likely continue well after I'm gone, if Mills is side-lined by Alzheimer's.

So a heart attack and/or stroke seem the most likely, for now (I assume we can rule out suicide or homicide). Though a car crash remains a distinct possibility, or even being thrown from a horse? :p

What do you think? How, and when, will this scam end?
 
markie said:
JeanTate said:
Of course they are.

And that includes determining that there's not one mention of hydrinos. Nor is any work of Mills cited. Etc.
Click to expand...
They don't know about hydrino.
Click to expand...
Really? How do you know that?

But for now they are starting to realize that 'dark matter' may well interact with baryonic matter. That's progress.
Click to expand...
My hilite.

As in, have been doing so for the last several decades. Interesting idiosyncratic meaning of "starting". :p

Oh dear, how little you know about "skeptics here"!
Click to expand...
I've seen no evidence that any skeptic on this thread is skeptical of mainstream opinion, only of aberrations from such.
Click to expand...
Hmm ... well, I could suggest that you re-read all the posts in this thread and its predecessors, but that'd probably be a waste of my typing. :p
 
Thanks.
markie said:
JeanTate said:
Bumpity bump bump is fun!

One more time, how would you know (that "the light spectrum from merely oxidizing metal [does not] match that of the hydrino reaction")?

Because:
a) you personally checked them [the spectra] out?
b) you asked someone you know is unaffiliated with Mills et al. and who you independently know has deep knowledge and experience?
c) you trust Mills implicitly (i.e. you never consider independent checking to be relevant)?
d) something else?
Click to expand...
How about a). Everything I've seen about metal combustion has the spectra intensity rising into the visible and fading into the UV.
Click to expand...
And you're quite certain you've seen every relevant spectrum?

May I ask where you saw those spectra?

The spectra of the SunCell reaction is almost entirely invisible, mostly in the eUV. It becomes visible and 'brilliant' only as the eUV is absorbed by the vapour and reemitted as lower energy light.
Click to expand...
And you know this because you've seen SunCell spectra, where, exactly?
 
markie said:
https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/Permeation082714.pdf

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/SunCellPaper.pdf

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/Hydrino-Blast-Power-Paper-050818.pdf

The catalysis reaction product was identified by Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence emission spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and MAS NMR.

The predicted molecular hydrino H2(1/4) was identified as a product of CIHT cells by MAS 1H NMR, electron-beam excitation emission spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and photoluminescence emission spectroscopy.

The predicted molecular hydrino H2(1/4) was identified as a product by Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence emission spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
Click to expand...
Cool! :)

So why does China still import vast quantities of oil? Why does North Korea spend so much effort to try to skirt sanctions on oil imports? Why have Russian goons, carrying vials of Novichok, not been seen in southern NJ?? :p
 
Last edited:
JeanTate said:
Cool! :)

So why does China still import vast quantities of oil? Why does North Korea spend so much effort to try to skirt sanctions on oil imports? Why have Russian goons, carrying vials of Novichok, not been seen in southern NJ?? :p
Click to expand...

Yeah, China doesn't give a hoot about patents or agreements or stealing ideas. Neither does Russia.

They could have planted an investor or scientist in with Mills to steal the free energy secrets.

Mills also definitely published the secret of the CIHT cell a while back, yet no one has copied it and run with it.
 
JeanTate said:
...

What do you think? How, and when, will this scam end?
Click to expand...


This is a form of the question I've been asking myself about this since I became aware of it years ago. What is it like to be on the inside of BLP? I think there have been a variety of true believer non-technical people over the years that were part of the company. They have mostly faded away without ever discussing what went on. From personal experience it is clear that Mills is litigious and I assume he fiercely enforces NDA's. I think NDA's are a key part of his strategy of getting technical people to stop by and then he publishes what they have to say without any publication of the reports independent of BLP.


I've mostly been curious about what the technical people on the inside have to say independent of Mills. I've never seen BLP reports that seem to be written by skeptical people inside the company, but there has to be some serious skepticism if they are normal technical type people.


The reasons these kind of questions are related to your question about what happens after Mills is that these would be the people that would either move-on or continue the process. My guess is that move-on is the likely situation. Unfortunately for them years of working at BLP will not be a winning mark on their resumes so they might be inclined to stick around. But I doubt that there is somebody in the company besides Mills that has his curious mix of skills and lack of ethics that has kept this afloat for thirty years. After Mills will there be people who were on the inside that write candid articles about BLP? I'd like to think so, but they may not. The story isn't big enough to attract coverage by major news organizations so there won't be much money available for somebody that writes a candid article about BLP from the inside and publicly reminding people of the author's involvement might not be good for his reputation.
 
Last edited:
davefoc said:
This is a form of the question I've been asking myself about this since I became aware of it years ago. What is it like to be on the inside of BLP? I think there have been a variety of true believer non-technical people over the years that were part of the company. They have mostly faded away without ever discussing what went on. From personal experience it is clear that Mills is litigious and I assume he fiercely enforces NDA's. I think NDA's are a key part of his strategy of getting technical people to stop by and then he publishes what they have to say without any publication of the reports independent of BLP.


I've mostly been curious about what the technical people on the inside have to say independent of Mills. I've never seen BLP reports that seem to be written by skeptical people inside the company, but there has to be some serious skepticism if they are normal technical type people.


The reasons these kind of questions are related to your question about what happens after Mills is that these would be the people that would either move-on or continue the process. My guess is that move-on is the likely situation. Unfortunately for them years of working at BLP will not be a winning mark on their resumes so they might be inclined to stick around. But I doubt that there is somebody in the company besides Mills that has his curious mix of skills and lack of ethics that has kept this afloat for thirty years. After Mills will there be people who were on the inside that write candid articles about BLP? I'd like to think so, but they may not. The story isn't big enough to attract coverage by major news organizations so there won't be much money available for somebody that writes a candid article about BLP from the inside and publicly reminding people of the author's involvement might not be good for his reputation.
Click to expand...

I've spoken with insiders, both current and ex-employees. I've never heard anything to indicate they felt fraud was being undertaken. The guy holding up the wrecked moly container in that picture confirmed to me the circumstances that led to it. Five seconds of light from a run away reaction burned thru 1/2" molybdenum.
 
Last edited:
tlp said:
One ex-employee is Brett Holverstott. Everybody should read his book and also his blog
http://www.brettholverstott.com/annoucements/2017/3/15/positive-alarmism
Click to expand...

From his blog: "But they are now building the alpha prototype of the SunCell in collaboration with the prototyping firm Columbia Technologies and a photovoltaic manufacturer Masimo Semiconductor. They plan to deploy units for field testing sites this year. Let's suppose it doesn't happen until next year."

He wrote that in early 2017 and the "next year" he was referring to at the time is the year that just ended. So they didn't produce in 2017 as he expected and his 2018 worst case has now come and gone. So how much more wrong information will we get by reading his book?

Why in the world should anyone care what this guy has to say? To the outside observer these people are just a 30 year supply of wrong.
 
Last edited:
optiongeek said:
One of the problems with the skeptical theory is that it requires a lot of people who need to be fully invested in perpetuating a fraud.
Click to expand...
One of the problems with the Mills program is that it requires belief that a) “the Chinese” (and ...) are completely unaware of it, b) they have no incentive to work on something similar without acknowledging Mills, and c) they have been unable to independently reproduce Mills’ results. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom