Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the description you want is “straw man”.

See, Bubba’s not getting any traction with his backdoor approach (get people to assent to an unrelated proposition, then convert that into agreement with his secondhand Q claims), so this strawman is a way for him to paint his interlocutors as blind or hopelessly obtuse or supporters of the cabal.

I’d say it’s remarkably passive-aggressive, but there’s nothing remarkable about it; it’s a bog-standard Bubba approach to yet another conspiracist fantasy. But if he’s so concerned about the subject, ......


I'm flattered, however I cannot take credit for this. Its been a slow week at the Q sleeper agents office, as Mr. Q has not posted for six days now. So I'm just rummaging around the cutting room floor and posting odds and ends in order to look busy in case the boss pops in.

Sorry to disappoint you, but with these odds and ends, I dont have an agenda. Sometimes it gets like this around the holidays.
 
Posted by Bubba View Post
"Grooming" they call it...

Imprisoned After Objecting to Muslim Rape Gangs

https://moonbattery.com/imprisoned-a...im-rape-gangs/




Nice source there, Bubba.



Racism, homophobia and white supremacist conspiracy theories.
Is there no depth to which you will not sink? :jaw-dropp

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moonbattery



And......today's denial//change the subject/attack the messenger award goes to...Cosmic Yak ! Again !

(he'd prefer we not see Moonbattery items when it disproves rationalwiki's irrational opinion).

Sorry to disappoint Yak, but its true....


"Grooming gangs" search results


grooming gangs - latest news, breaking stories and comment - The ...
https://www.independent.co.uk/topic/grooming-gangs

Rotherham child sex grooming gang sentenced to 101 years in prison. Victims describe ... Parents urged to learn signs of sexual grooming after abuser jailed · Crime .... Muslim community responds to Newcastle grooming gang · Crime.
Missing: objecting ‎| ‎Must include: ‎objecting
Grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around ...
https://www.independent.co.uk › News › UK › Crime

Feb 23, 2018 - Newcastle grooming gang victim sleeps with knife by bed after rape ... and as a result a large number of perpetrators were arrested and prosecuted, and victims .... A crashed car, with an object protruding through the windscreen, sits ..... Muslim girls have been abused by grooming gangs in other parts of the ...
Twenty members of grooming gang convicted - BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-45918845

Oct 19, 2018 - Huddersfield grooming: Twenty guilty of campaign of rape and abuse ... Other members of the gang were jailed for between five and 18 years but ... published after reporting restrictions on a series of trials were partially lifted.
Missing: objecting ‎| ‎Must include: ‎objecting
Oxford grooming gang: Six members jailed - BBC News - BBC.com
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-44456610

Jun 12, 2018 - Sexual abuse became "the norm" for the gang members, a judge said. ... Hussain was described as using one victim as a "sexual object". ... false imprisonment, sentenced to 8 years; Moinul Islam, 41, of Wykeham Crescent, Oxford, guilty of rape, two ... New mum 'bleeds to death after getting lost in hospital'.
Rochdale child sex abuse ring - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring

The Rochdale child sex abuse ring involved underage teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester, England. Nine men were convicted of sex trafficking and other offences including rape, ... One gang member convicted of sex trafficking was a religious studies teacher at a mosque and ..... Hindu and Sikh objections[edit].
 
I'm flattered, however I cannot take credit for this...

Just curious: did any of the other posters think Bubba would actually answer, instead of posting yet another mock-humble evasion?
 
Last edited:
I think the Clintons are naughty. I know....thats just me....and since HRC as been such a big part of all things Q....


Since I just (recently) realized that a big factor in this room is that there is a strong partisan element in the objections to the Q-ish items, what with y'all being so fond of Hillary and all...

Well, here is an ez way to do it....I will just paste up this item I saw on facebook. The video mentioned is a CSPAN video:

"....The mainstream media isn’t reporting it (obviously) and it’s about today’s hearing for the Clinton Foundation. I’m guessing there’s going to be a huge investigation soon if not already.

For those of you who don’t know, today the Clinton Foundation was under hearing for illegal activity. During the hearing a whistleblower came out with evidence of the foundation illegally lying about being a non-profit organization, and that they are actually acting FOR PROFIT. They have evidence that the Foundation is one of the biggest fronts as a means for income tax evasion in history. Up to 2.5 BILLION dollars may be subject to taxes from various donors including Bill Gates. Additionally it appears there’s been illegal interactions with leaders of other foreign countries

The video is two of the whistleblowers halfway through the hearing talking about the illegal activity going on"....
 
A video I saw on facebook.
An unsourced claim that the video was from C-Span.
Claims that include ALLCAPS about what the video shows that impugn Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

Sounds legit.
 
Attacks messenger much?

Deconstructing your evasions, refusal to take intellectual responsibility for your secondhand claims, and other dodges of your reliably passive-aggressive argument approach is not “attacking the messenger”; it’s accountability.

More importantly, though, your appeal to the ad hominem fallacy fails because I’m not saying Q is claptrap because of anything to do with you. Nice try, though!

Now that I’ve entertained your most recent diversion briefly, would you care to answer the question that started it: since you’re so concerned about pedophilia rackets, would you advocate for a DOJ IG investigation into why Acosta let Epstein off so lightly? C’mon, Bubba, Bill Clinton was associated with Epstein. Just because Trump was Epstein’s friend and neighbor, and Trump gave Acosta a Cabinet post, that’s not gonna scare you off, right?
 
A video I saw on facebook.
An unsourced claim that the video was from C-Span.
Claims that include ALLCAPS about what the video shows that impugn Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

Sounds legit.

No, wait! Breaking news on the Q front!

The New York Attorney General’s office just announced the impending supervised dissolution of the Clinton Foundation - (squints) - sorry, of the Trump Foundation as part of the AG’s investigation into the “shocking pattern of illegality involving the Clinton [oops -Ed.] Trump Foundation – including unlawful coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing, and much more.”

The AG noted that their lawsuit will continue to “[hold] to account for their clear and repeated violations of state and federal law” the Clinton Foundation and its directors. Dadgumit, sorry - that’s the Trump Foundation and its directors.

But, uh, I’m sure this is all part of the Q plan!
 
Are you kidding ?

Doesnt everyone?

And that's all we need to know: conspiracy theorists don't, as a whole, believe any of the theories they espouse. They're role-playing, play-acting a fantasy that the world is much more complex and dangerous than it actually is, because their lives are so boring that they need to amp it up.

No Bubba, not everyone does.
 
Posted by Bubba View Post
Are you kidding ?

Doesnt everyone?


Wet blanket pretends not to recognize obvious sarcasm:


And that's all we need to know: conspiracy theorists don't, as a whole, believe any of the theories they espouse. They're role-playing, play-acting a fantasy that the world is much more complex and dangerous than it actually is, because their lives are so boring that they need to amp it up.

No Bubba, not everyone does.
 
Deconstructing your evasions, refusal to take intellectual responsibility for your secondhand claims, and other dodges of your reliably passive-aggressive argument approach is not “attacking the messenger”; it’s accountability.

More importantly, though, your appeal to the ad hominem fallacy fails because I’m not saying Q is claptrap because of anything to do with you. Nice try, though!

Now that I’ve entertained your most recent diversion briefly, would you care to answer the question that started it: since you’re so concerned about pedophilia rackets, would you advocate for a DOJ IG investigation into why Acosta let Epstein off so lightly? C’mon, Bubba, Bill Clinton was associated with Epstein. Just because Trump was Epstein’s friend and neighbor, and Trump gave Acosta a Cabinet post, that’s not gonna scare you off, right?


Actually Im not that concerned ....Are you?

Nonetheless, yes, I'd advocate for a DOJ IG investigation into why Acosta let Epstein off so lightly
 
Actually Im not that concerned ....Are you?

I guess I formed a false impression from your previous mentions of the topic, not to mention your favorable interest in the Q claims, which are heavily into accusations of pedophilia.

Bubba said:
Nonetheless, yes, I'd advocate for a DOJ IG investigation into why Acosta let Epstein off so lightly

Well, then, we’re in agreement on that. I am (without sarcasm) a bit curious as to how this support jibes with your earlier response (highlighting yours):

..,And you ignore the fact that the President bragged about ogling naked under-aged girls, and has a former Florida prosecutor on his cabinet who bent over backward to get an actual pedophile and pedophile ring leader the lightest sentence possible...

Is this a change of mind, or am I not understanding what you meant by “hogwash”?
 
Actually, there are...but none of the real ones bear any resemblance to Q's fantasies. And wasting time having people watch out for Griffins means several get eaten by the bears they ignored.

I don't believe Q is acting out a wish fulfillment fantasy.

My belief is that whoever they are, they enjoy giving The Commandantes' fans a handy and watching them flail around in their worshipful St. Vitus dance over the greatness of their dear leader.

Here's one for Q fans.

The feds managed to shut down Silk Road, get a conviction on who ran the operation (there's a few honest questions not yet answered about that) and this was a truly international case - all without the suspenseful drama associated with this Q jerk-off.

Some people evidently like being stroked hard more than they want hard proof.

The fun for me comes in when this con job comes crashing down with their dear leader. At this point, he may end up indicted before any of Q's alleged pedo/demo/pinko cast of thousands.

This is how confident that I am that this Q material is ********.

Let's get a bet going - To Q supporters, I'll bet $100.00 U.S. dollars that there will be no massive indictments and convictions (they're asserting tens of thousands of sealed indictments, I'll be generous here, let's define massive as a minimum of 100 individuals) for a child sex trafficking ring before Trump is out of office (by whatever means)

If I win, the loser donates the C note to a group who actually works to protect kids:

https://protect.org/

Disclosure: I was a charter member way back when and remain so. Just so you know my heart is in the right place I'll match the $100.00 if you lose. I lose, you stipulate what charity my $100.00 goes to. If there's two Q supporters here to take this bet I'll take the action for both.

Ball is in the court of the Trump myrmidons/Q fanboys.
 
I guess I formed a false impression from your previous mentions of the topic, not to mention your favorable interest in the Q claims, which are heavily into accusations of pedophilia.



Well, then, we’re in agreement on that. I am (without sarcasm) a bit curious as to how this support jibes with your earlier response (highlighting yours):



Is this a change of mind, or am I not understanding what you meant by “hogwash”?



On that day it meant here's some of your own nonsense, to my homey Axxman
 
Surprise ! (not)

The mainstream press has not reported this, nor has it adequately covered the level of insurrection occurring in France, which saw its fifth straight weekend of Yellow Vest riots over increased globalization and bureaucracy.

"Report: Macron Accused of TREASON in Letter Signed by Twelve Generals"


With bonus mention of:

New rule: migration is now a human right.
-UN


The pact was signed last week by 164 nations in Marrakech, Morocco. Along with drastically increasing the number of third world migrants that will make their way to the west, the pact also instructs governments to educate journalists on the terminology they should use when discussing migration, and makes no distinction between legal and illegal migration. Among those who did not sign onto the agreement were the United States, Austria, Hungary, Poland and Italy.


https://bigleaguepolitics.com/report-macron-accused-of-treason-in-letter-signed-by-twelve-generals/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom