• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
You might want to read what I actually wrote.



It is obvious from the typography that you are wrong. Also, Miller should not have known which sample was which nor what experimental conditions the samples had endured.

Thermacore labelled the graph for publication with "Hydrino peak", "Virgin tubing", and "K2CO3".

Why you ignore the obvious in favor of wishful thinking and nonsensical excuses is interesting.


Now that you pointed out the typography aspect, and I compare that typography with other drawings made by Thermacore, I'm compelled to agree with you that it was Thermacore who put ["Hydrino peak"], [Virgin Tubing] and [K2CO3 diffusion cell tubing] labelling on the graph. Imagine that. But again, it's not a terribly big deal.

About the point that Al Miller should not have known what conditions the tubing was subjected to, I would point out that knowing such would not bias the measurements themselves, only the interpretation of such. Miller probably would want to know exactly what the tubing endured so he could more intelligently interpret the results.

For fun, here is a video of him discussing XPS at Lehigh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0aZ1Nq66b0
 
Yes, it was a biggie. You were trying to promote your fairy tale it was an internal document by fabricating an internal purpose for it, to seek internal funding.

Your original statement was contrary to fact. Your attempt to backpedal was contrary to fact.

Of course there would be an internal purpose for the report. Why would Thermacore want to fund further in-house research on potential hydrino energy if there was no basis to do so? The report would provide a basis.
 
Of course there would be an internal purpose for the report. Why would Thermacore want to fund further in-house research on potential hydrino energy if there was no basis to do so? The report would provide a basis.



Dude. Give it up. You were caught lying. Move on.
 
That’s it. I’m contributing to the “Hydrino and the Bible” book some Creationists I know are working on. Last I heard the project was stalled on some of the math for claiming Hydrinos explain why the sun’s corona is hotter than the core. Having read some of Randy’s bloated valise, I’m confident I have more than sufficient math skills to produce material of comparable quality.

To make sure its really, really 'Sciency' include some English language Gematria into the mix.

https://www.gematrix.org/gematria.php#english_gematria

It'll really spice it up and make real sure it'll get 'wows'.
 
Dude. Give it up. You were caught lying. Move on.

Isn't that so common as to no longer require a comment? ----- I mean he's trying to justify a 30 year old scam based on fake science - so...................... 'he gonna be tellin' whoppers on a regular basis'.
 
The calculated ionization energies are close enough to be very impressive, considering Mills doesn't take into account higher order effects.

If these are supposed to be the equations that accurately describe reality and are meant to completely overturn every advancement in physics of the last 100 years, then I don't think "close enough" is impressive.
 
From 1999, Ricerca is just a contract lab,but still we've seen nothing since from them. They are still around as a "for hire" lab.

Ricerca Inc.'s lab east of Cleveland was similarly flummoxed by what it found when studying BlackLight Power's materials. "They were inorganic compounds that have organic properties. That is unusual," says Dr. Yong-Xi Li, manager of Ricerca's advanced mass spectrometry lab. "We totally don't know what's going on. The reason is that I've never seen before these kinds of properties in all my career. Probably we have to do more work."

Never seen it in all his career, and then nothing...

Also from 1999, and again we have no further info on it.

Mills has this sort of MO, where there are articles with supposedly impressive names and info, and Mills always "might" or "may" do this or that, but then nothing ever follows.

BlackLight Power and researchers at the weapons division of the Naval Air Warfare Center at China Lake, California, confirm that they are heading toward a research and development pact that would allow the navy to produce energy and materials from hydrinos and to develop applications of the new compounds. A spokeswoman for the Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Maryland says in an e-mail letter that after a meeting with Mills "there was considerable interest in the reported properties of the new hydrogen-containing compounds, and in obtaining samples for independent analysis and evaluation."

BlackLight Power's newest board member is retired vice admiral Michael P. Kalleres, who commanded the U.S. fleet in the Atlantic during the Gulf War and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Striking Fleet. He's also a consultant for the Defense Science Board and the Naval Studies Board of the National Academy of Science.

"I feel very confident in what [Mills] has created," Kalleres says. He adds that he has no investment in BlackLight Power and takes no salary from the company, although he anticipates an option to invest later. After observing the company's practices for years, he believes that it's produced things of which the military should make use.

Ships with hydrino material cladding would likely be stealthy and rustproof, Kalleres says. Eliminating rust could radically reduce crews on some ships, savings millions of dollars.

http://pages.suddenlink.net/anomalousimages/images/news/news556.html
 
Last edited:
In the next year, Mills promises, the revolution will be "hydrinoized."

In one of BlackLight Power's cavernous laboratories sits the prototype energy-and chemical-producing cell that is the heart of Mills's ambitions. Mills explains that in this contraption, resembling a souped-up home furnace, water is electrically then catalytically broken down into atoms of oxygen and hydrogen. Potassium atoms are introduced as a gas into the very low-pressure hydrogen gas waiting inside the cell. Under specific conditions, the potassium acts as a catalyst to collapse hydrogen's electron orbit. The energy once used to maintain the higher orbit is released as ultra-violet light, Mills says.

The heat from that process can build pressure to turn a turbine for a generator or an engine, BlackLight Power notes in a marketing plan. The smaller hydrogen atoms, called "hydrinos," remaining in the cell can then react with other elements placed there to form novel compounds with amazing properties, Mills claims. "This will change how most everyday things in the 21st century are made and used," he says. For example:

EHydrinos combined with inorganic elements produce conductive, magnetic plastics that would revolutionize circuitry and aerospace engineering, and shrink and speed up semiconductors.

EHydrinos combined with highly oxygenated matter would form the basis of batteries the size of a briefcase to drive your car 1000 miles at highway speeds on a single charge, without gasoline.

EOne type of hydrino combined with an acid would produce incredibly powerful explosives or rocket propellants.

EHydrino and metal compounds make for super-strong coatings, some of which could make ships rustproof, dramatically reducing crew complements.

There are "millions and millions of possible combinations" in the commercial world, Mills says, revealing himself as a practical, earthy businessman.

All of these claims are just made up, imo.
It's been 20 years since they were spoken.
No such device or compounds have ever been documented by anyone other than Mills or people connected to Mills.

There was no such equipment, no such compounds, etc.

Just Mills playing a sympathetic media to attract spending money.

http://pages.suddenlink.net/anomalousimages/images/news/news556.html
 
If these are supposed to be the equations that accurately describe reality and are meant to completely overturn every advancement in physics of the last 100 years, then I don't think "close enough" is impressive.


Compared to what QM can do for ionization energies it is very impressive. Even so, it is just a necessarily busy side branch of the grander goal Mills accomplishes in his book. This shows the unification of the equations of Newton and Maxwell and SG and GR and Planck and deBroglie in the context of particle production. This comes together in the Gravity chapter, 32.
 
A delusion that Al Miller added a "Hydrino Peak" label to Thermacore's figure

Calling it a 'peak' is really a misnomer in the first place....
Thanks, we can add that as another Thermacore lie, markie!
A small Thermacore lie of a "peak" when it is more of a bump. But then we get :
28 November 2018 markie: A delusion or insult that Al Miller added a "Hydrino Peak" label to Thermacore's figure.

You really do not understand how labs work. People send samples to them. The lab does the analysis. They may just return raw data. They usually take the raw data and say what the existing, tested science states the results show. A lab doing ESCA analysis will return raw data or data with labels marking the known spectra of elements. For example, send DNA to a lab and they can return an analysis with the sources of the DNA but they will not label unknown sequences as coming from Bigfoot or aliens! Al Miller's lab would not do a similar act for samples of tubing.

We do not have Al Miller's report. Al Miller did standard lab analysis and would have labelled the results with documented peaks for known elements. Al Miller is an educated scientist who would not be deluded enough to believe in fairy tales like hydrinos. Thermacore were the gullible cold fusion/hydrino believers who knew about and fell for Mills hydrino delusions. Thus it was Thermacore who added the label to the bump.

22 November 2018 markie: Emphasizes Thermacore at least incompetence by not making the ESCA report available.
22 November 2018 markie: Cannot Could not understand the LeHigh graph that Thermacore lied about.
27 November 2018 markie: Believes in a second obvious lie in an already lying Thermacore document.
 
Last edited:
If you replace the confusing "heliocentric solar system moving in elliptical orbits under gravitational influence" theory with my simple model of rotating transparent spheres surrounding a stationary earth, you can predict the motions of the sun and planets with an impressive 96% accuracy.
 
If you're attempting to replace every advancement in physics over the last century then "eh, it's vaguely right" isn't good enough.

Why the need to greatly exaggerate when you say "replace every advancement"?
Didn't I say yesterday that Mills uses unifies the great contributions in physics from the last several hundred years? Yeah, he does modify QM and GR. The advancements recently have been technological, not theoretical. Theory painted itself into a very 'dark' corner.
 
If you replace the confusing "heliocentric solar system moving in elliptical orbits under gravitational influence" theory with my simple model of rotating transparent spheres surrounding a stationary earth, you can predict the motions of the sun and planets with an impressive 96% accuracy.


You have it backwards. QM is the theory with free parameters, fudge factors, coming out the whazoo. Like epicycles, wheels upon wheels. Like epicycles it does work pretty well for computation. But it is based on unphysical principles.
Along comes gravitational theory and the equations of motion and things are much simpler. Sometimes not as accurate when higher order effects are not accounted for, but still, a vast improvement from what was before.
 
You have it backwards. QM is the theory with free parameters, fudge factors, coming out the whazoo. Like epicycles, wheels upon wheels. Like epicycles it does work pretty well for computation. But it is based on unphysical principles.
Along comes gravitational theory and the equations of motion and things are much simpler. Sometimes not as accurate when higher order effects are not accounted for, but still, a vast improvement from what was before.

And your actual sources and citations for this?
:)
 
You have it backwards. QM is the theory with free parameters, fudge factors, coming out the whazoo. Like epicycles, wheels upon wheels. Like epicycles it does work pretty well for computation. But it is based on unphysical principles.
Along comes gravitational theory and the equations of motion and things are much simpler. Sometimes not as accurate when higher order effects are not accounted for, but still, a vast improvement from what was before.
Sisyphus had it easy.

We've been over this Mills nonsense before. More than once. Why do we have to go over (and over and over) it yet again?

The tl;dr version: Mills' "theory" is riddled with nonsense, internal inconsistencies, (and more), and is useless for doing anything worthwhile in atomic physics or chemistry.
 
Good lord no. February 2019 was my prediction (made grudgingly) for a date that BLP would have a prototype that was provably (to a reasonable skeptic) producing useful amounts of power. Going from a working prototype to a product used in the industrial sector will take at least a few more years. A product for residential use at least a few years after that.
Thanks.

From 26 Feb, 2017:

markie said:
If there no satisfactorily proven, working prototype in 48 months, I promise to come back and eat humble pie before you, without a fork. My Google Calendar for Friday, February 26th 2021 now has an entry.
<snip>

I can see hydrogen, a fixed trace amount of oxygen, gallium or silver, and something like tungsten, but that's about it. Commercial units will be run on H2 gas, which can be derived from water or alkanes.

Yes of course it's near impossible to predict some outcomes, like what crud if any may build up in the reactor over time from trace contaminants. But as far as I know any waste product must escape out via diffusion through the reactor wall. The only thing doing that will be dihydrino gas and perhaps some hydrogen gas.
Here's a curious fact: AFAICT, in none of Mills' previous announcements of imminent commercial production was there mention of the need for health or environmental impact studies.

Did no one on his (supposed) high-powered board(s) ever raise this? Did none of his lawyers sit him down and tell him that potential investors might be interested to know what his plans were on this?

I vaguely recall reading that Mills thinks (thought?) that some of his magical hydrino compounds would cure cancer. Little known fact: most chemotherapeutic agents are potent poisons, and many are in fact quite carcinogenic (the known benefit of killing cancer cells outweighs the small extra likelihood of the development of new cancers). Does Mills' Magic Cells produce any such chemicals, even in minute amounts? No one knows.

Those "trace contaminants" in "the crud" can easily escape, during routine maintenance for example, or inadvertent breach of the reactor vessel (very likely if cars, say, get powered by Mills' Magic Cells), or improper disposal at the "end of useful life" (there are a great many examples of this sort of thing happening in the past; PCBs for example).
 
If Mills were making a new high efficiency conventional 100Kw genset, with a basically conventional engine and conventional generator, just with some enhancements of his own for efficiency, it would still take a long time to get it through the approvals process to be able to sell it or lease it. It could easily take 2 years to get it approved, even though it's basically a conventional genset.

Yet we still have no mention of getting approval for this totally new "hotter than the sun" device.

Since this would be a totally new device, there wouldn't even be a standard test and report plan to go by. They would need to come up with a new one, which would add even more time. They wouldn't even know how to test it. They would also need to research hydrinos.

With a new bicyle, or refrigerator, or car, they would have previous experience. They would know how to test and what to look for and what constitutes a failure.
With a Sun Cell, they'd be starting off with a blank page.

If Mills had a working device right now, it could easily be 5 years before the approval process was completed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom