Lessons to be learned from the Kavanaugh Hearing

[Hellbound]

http://www.dps.texas.gov/internetforms/Forms/DL-7.pdf

Start on page 26. No, they don't have right-of-way, which only means you don't have to stop to let them go across if they're, say, waiting on the curb. It specifically does NOT mean you can run them over if they attempt to cross anyway.

 

[Elagabalus]

http://www.dps.texas.gov/internetforms/Forms/DL-7.pdf

Start on page 26. No, they don't have right-of-way, which only means you don't have to stop to let them go across if they're, say, waiting on the curb. It specifically does NOT mean you can run them over if they attempt to cross anyway.

^^THIS^^ It's one of those trick questions they put on the test to catch you out.

 

[Elagabalus]

"The Democrats have become too extreme and they’ve become, frankly, too dangerous to govern. They’ve gone wacko! You don’t give power to an angry left-wing mob."

-- President Donald J. Trump (Oct 10, 2018)

You're trying to convince us with a quote from looney tunes trump?

 

[Belz...]

They bullied the driver and when you bully someone in a car, don't be surprised if they try to get away from you any way they can.

This answers neither of my questions. Evasion noted.

 

[Belz...]

"The Democrats have become too extreme and they’ve become, frankly, too dangerous to govern. They’ve gone wacko! You don’t give power to an angry left-wing mob."

Once again, you show your preference for a one-party state.

 

[Craig4]

"The Democrats have become too extreme and they’ve become, frankly, too dangerous to govern. They’ve gone wacko! You don’t give power to an angry left-wing mob."

-- President Donald J. Trump (Oct 10, 2018)

Sounds like the dirty Russian whore is getting a little desperate.

 

[Craig4]

"Michelle Obama always says, 'When they go low, we go high.' No. When they go low, we kick 'em. That’s what this new Democratic Party is about.”

--.

Good, a Democrat who gets it. You can't go high with Trump and his kind. The kind of scum who would sell out his country to the Russians doesn't deserve respect and will never reciprocate.

 

[P.J. Denyer]

''Renate Alumnius' is because we love her so. Or wish we did, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more!'

A nod's as good as a wink to a blind boof.

 

[Delvo]

This business about how it's just fine to murder lefties but lefties are the real violent ones convinces me that our resident "conservatives" or whatever they might call themselves are not being serious and saying what they actually think. They're just trying whatever they think will rile people up the most, and honestly presenting alternatives for debate & consideration on policy issues just doesn't do it enough, so they have to go for the pure-evil, obviously-psychotic angle for more expected shock value. For me, that move from real ideas that real people really think to overdone attempted theatrics is just a move from at least potentially interesting to boring.

 

[Stacyhs]

This business about how it's just fine to murder lefties but lefties are the real violent ones convinces me that our resident "conservatives" or whatever they might call themselves are not being serious and saying what they actually think. They're just trying whatever they think will rile people up the most, and honestly presenting alternatives for debate & consideration on policy issues just doesn't do it enough, so they have to go for the pure-evil, obviously-psychotic angle for more expected shock value. For me, that move from real ideas that real people really think to overdone attempted theatrics is just a move from at least potentially interesting to boring.

There's definitely a handful of our resident conservatives who do nothing but make outlandish statements just to get a rise. Which is why that little 'ignore' feature comes in so handy.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Interesting that the term “mob” seems to be appearing with some frequency from the lips and fingers of the Rs. Reminds me of the prominent use of “thug” not too long ago.

 

[Mumbles]

Interesting that the term “mob” seems to be appearing with some frequency from the lips and fingers of the Rs. Reminds me of the prominent use of “thug” not too long ago.

Makes me wonder if a certain supposedly wealthy politician is still in the money-laundering business, myself, but...

 

[Stacyhs]

Makes me wonder if a certain supposedly wealthy politician is still in the money-laundering business, myself, but...

Personally, that and tax fraud are why I think that a certain "wealthy politician" is so freaking scared of the Mueller investigation.

 

[River]

That makes no sense. You're portraying the perp in this instance as a victim and using cheap emotional tricks to garner sympathy for the noble citizen "defending his hearth and home".

What you mean, obviously, is no, you had no idea that you were showing another angle of the incident in question. You just went looking for some friendly rightwing sites showing justified attempted homicide, not realizing you'd already shot your load and missed on this same topic.

Carry on with your fantasy. Glad to know we can count on your "innocent" vote when they finally catch up with the guy who socked Richard Spencer. I mean, apparently disagreeing with someone is sufficient cause to cause them bodily harm in Riverworld.

If you think its a good idea to block traffic illegally, and harass or assault people as your legal right to protest -- you're sorely mistaken.

The way I see it; you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Keep your protesting legal and on the sidewalk. Or take the chance of someone running your dumbass over.

 

[River]

^^THIS^^ It's one of those trick questions they put on the test to catch you out.

I find it funny how many want to seem to ignore the fact: it's illegal to block or coral traffic. It's also in some places illegal to jaywalk.

Combine that with harassing and vandalizing peoples property, and threatening them if they don't obey your stop line -- leftists are lucky this has not resulted in more deaths. Yet. If people keep seeming to think its OK to block traffic and harass or detain others, they are in for some rude awakening.

GTFO the roadway. Period.

 

[Mumbles]

If you think its a good idea to block traffic illegally, and harass or assault people as your legal right to protest -- you're sorely mistaken.

The way I see it; you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Keep your protesting legal and on the sidewalk. Or take the chance of someone running your dumbass over.

So you also have no problem with someone being beaten senseless for trying to drive through a crowd, then.

Or maybe you just enjoy seeing harm come to people who belong to a different party than you or some such foolishness, thus entirely abandoning any pretext you are pretending to have concerning legality? I mean, it would shock me to see another conservative either having little to no knowledge of the basics of political discussion (given your remarkably insightful views on voter suppression) or to wish harm to perceived political opponents (given...the past decade or so of outstanding conservative conduct)...

 

[Delvo]

The pure-evil act here is too over-the-top. Even cartoon villains and Bond villains aren't this cartoon/Bond-villainish.

 

[Foolmewunz]

If you think its a good idea to block traffic illegally, and harass or assault people as your legal right to protest -- you're sorely mistaken.

Perhaps if you told us what language you speak on your home planet, we could find a translation. CHECK THE PORTLAND LAWS. This was not illegal. A pedestrian at an intersection with a Walk Light in their favor, to boot.... HAS THE RIGHT OF WAY.

They didn't assault anyone. They stood their ground!

The way I see it; you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Keep your protesting legal and on the sidewalk. Or take the chance of someone running your dumbass over.

The way I see it, it's pretty obvious where "stupid" and "dumbass" are in this conversation.

 

[River]

Perhaps if you told us what language you speak on your home planet, we could find a translation. CHECK THE PORTLAND LAWS. This was not illegal. A pedestrian at an intersection with a Walk Light in their favor, to boot.... HAS THE RIGHT OF WAY.

They didn't assault anyone. They stood their ground!



The way I see it, it's pretty obvious where "stupid" and "dumbass" are in this conversation.

Yeah because you think for some reason one side has more rights than the other. Sorry, it doesnt work that way. Those "protesters" have NO RIGHT to detain anyone. They have NO RIGHT to block the street. They have NO RIGHT to harass or vandalize peoples property. Yet you defend them.

Meanwhile, the innocent people coming home from work are just trying to get along with their lives. But for some reason you think "protesters" have the right to mess with these people, or detain them. People are going to start getting sued for this. Also, more people will die.

A police officer cannot illegally detain a citizen. What makes you think its fine for protesters.

The left mob is out of control, and if the moderates on the left do not speak out against it and stop it -- you will see the same tactics from the hard right. Will it be only then that the left speaks out against this guerrilla warfare tactic?

If this keeps up, I will not be against a civil war to clean up the mess this has become. Leftist: keep thinking its fine to mess with people. See what happens.

 

[wareyin]

Yeah because you think for some reason one side has more rights than the other. Sorry, it doesnt work that way. Those "protesters" have NO RIGHT to detain anyone. They have NO RIGHT to block the street. They have NO RIGHT to harass or vandalize peoples property. Yet you defend them.

Meanwhile, the innocent people coming home from work are just trying to get along with their lives. But for some reason you think "protesters" have the right to mess with these people, or detain them. People are going to start getting sued for this. Also, more people will die.

A police officer cannot illegally detain a citizen. What makes you think its fine for protesters.

The left mob is out of control, and if the moderates on the left do not speak out against it and stop it -- you will see the same tactics from the hard right. Will it be only then that the left speaks out against this guerrilla warfare tactic?

If this keeps up, I will not be against a civil war to clean up the mess this has become. Leftist: keep thinking its fine to mess with people. See what happens.

You appear to be unfamiliar with traffic laws in the United States. Pedestrians at an intersection with a walk symbol always have the right of way.

Do you similarly run red lights in your car because those evil meanies going through when they have a green light are detaining you?