• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

New SCOTUS Judge II: The Wrath of Kavanaugh

"The Senate confirmation process was contentious and emotional," Kavanuagh said. "That process is over. My focus now is to be the best justice I can be. I take this office with gratitude and no bitterness."
 
None of the three accusers asserted that BK raped them.

man the Left is broken.

No, he just tried to rape them. This is nearly as silly a distinction as when Bill Donohue claimed that since some of the Catholic priest's victims weren't penetrated, they weren't really abused.
 
Both sides are broken.

Truly. Once side gives us the despicable Trump, while the other side can't find a way to defeat him politically despite countless opportunities. What a mess, and we're stuck with the bill.
 
Right. Fairness requires accuracy. He just sexually assaulted them while he was blackout drunk. Much better.

Irony.

In happier news:

Justice Kavanaugh seemed at ease on the bench today--perhaps happy to be back in judicial robes after the most polarizing hearings in the modern era. He asked several questions.

-- Ariane de Vogue, CNN
 
Nonsense.

Sheer nonsense.

ford clearly had the wrong guy, the yale girl was hammered out of her gourd and Avenatti's nonsense was a pure scam.

Yep, they're all wrong, or they're all in on it. Just like them enticing altar boys in their sexy getups.
 
Yep, they're all wrong, or they're all in on it.

Hmm, what if one of them was wrong? Lets take a gander, we know that Avenatti's claim was a total and complete scam from the get go, right?

You saw her NBC interview and you are aware that she walked back her claims and that numerous Dems are hammering him for bring such a specious claim, right?

Yes__ No___

we'll get to the others next.
 
Hmm, what if one of them was wrong? Lets take a gander, we know that Avenatti's claim was a total and complete scam from the get go, right?

You saw her NBC interview and you are aware that she walked back her claims and that numerous Dems are hammering him for bring such a specious claim, right?

Yes__ No___

we'll get to the others next.

If one of them were wrong, then one of them were wrong. That's all that means.

All these poor, poor pitiful men; fathers, sons, brothers, second cousins . . . all of them victims of false accusations.

All except for Bill Clinton and all those raping Mexicans. They're guilty.
 
Will anyone arguing before the court refer to him as Justice O'Kavenaugh, whether it be in error or intentionally?

Will statements that the legal team in front of the Court is not funded by the Clintons or Soros make it into the record?
 
If one of them were wrong, then one of them were wrong. That's all that means.

All these poor, poor pitiful men; fathers, sons, brothers, second cousins . . . all of them victims of false accusations.

All except for Bill Clinton and all those raping Mexicans. They're guilty.

Most priests prefer if you capitalize the honorific Father.
 
If one of them were wrong, then one of them were wrong. That's all that means.

All these poor, poor pitiful men; fathers, sons, brothers, second cousins . . . all of them victims of false accusations.

All except for Bill Clinton and all those raping Mexicans. They're guilty.

I said we were working them through one by one.

I take it you don't believe Avenatti's client. Smart.

Lets take a gander at the Yalie:

On the night of the alleged incident, Ramirez admits to being drunk and, since then, having gaps in her memory. According to The New Yorker, "she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh's role in the alleged incident with certainty."

The magazine reported that it took six days of "carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney" for Ramirez to go on record accusing Kavanaugh." The Times reported that Ramirez had contacted several of her former classmates to see if they remembered the incident because she could not be certain that Kavanaugh had been the perpetrator. CNN has not been able to find any firsthand eyewitnesses to corroborate her story

Sounds like she was black out drunk:

Yes___ No____
 
According to several high-ranking anonymous sources, Michael Avenatti is currently the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination:

You realize that this post is self-conradicting, right?
 
Sounds like she was black out drunk:

Yes___ No____

No more a drunk than Kavanaugh, and not as rapey. Actually, K-man is worse as he was so drunk, he couldn't complete the rape.

Let's lookie-lou at this:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/heal...ience-researchers-say/?utm_term=.d0eaf39d28b8

“The person lying on top of you — who she’d previously met — you’re not going to forget that,” said Richard Huganir, a neuroscientist at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. “There’s a total consensus in the field of memory ... If anything, fear and trauma enhances the encoding of the memory at a molecular level . . .

It’s such a basic tenet of psychology and cognitive science that some researchers watched the mistaken-identity theory spread through the Senate this month with a sense of stunned dismay.

“I watched all the hearings that took place last week and was just floored at the number of people who offered that as an explanation,” said Ira Hyman, a cognitive psychologist who specializes in traumatic memories at Western Washington University.

Which is why I believe Dr. Ford over Kavanaugh.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom