• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

New SCOTUS Judge II: The Wrath of Kavanaugh

In other words a job? I assume the government will pay a good living wage?

What if it is is a single mother with infant children?

No, government should never provide jobs, unless it's to kill brown people in brown countries.

Women should only have sex if they are married, and never get divorced.[/Republican]
 
Ummm…..guys...….Kavanaugh?
I'm not thrilled to have been sucked into an exchange on the sacredness of Personal Responsibility, but it happened, OK? It's a distraction from the fact that Donald ******* Trump, of all people, has become the most influential person in America. McCain had the right idea disallowing him from his funeral.

I do think that you are one data point of someone turned off by the Democrats' behavior, but there are just as many - probably more - Democrats who approved. If the goal was actually to block Kavanaugh specifically, I don't know what else they could have done. I know I said go ahead and confirm him, let us limp forward from here, but bottom line I think he was a terrible appointee. The country could have done much better. He's extremely immature. Not what I want in a judge. If he can make me nostalgic for Rehnquist, he's probably pretty bad.
 
This kind of diatribe IMHO should be prosecuted for libel.


*snort*


And it is a good thing that you don't get to have your way. Here in reality it is just a harsh truth that ****face McRapevan got seated on the court despite the evidence against him and I will call him a rapist all I ******* want. I hope the Rapepublican party is proud of themselves.
 
*snort*


And it is a good thing that you don't get to have your way. Here in reality it is just a harsh truth that ****face McRapevan got seated on the court despite the evidence against him and I will call him a rapist all I ******* want. I hope the Rapepublican party is proud of themselves.
You could be prosecuted, but he'd have to prove it wasn't true.

ETA: And he'd have to prove you knew it wasn't true.

People want limited government, but they want the government to after anonymous hotheads on the Internet. Go figure.
 
Last edited:
You could be prosecuted, but he'd have to prove it wasn't true.

ETA: And he'd have to prove you knew it wasn't true.

People want limited government, but they want the governmentperson suing to go after people who libel them

^^^Fixed the above for you.
 
^^^Fixed the above for you.
There is such a thing as criminal libel. But if you're saying Kavanaugh should sue Travis, you'd have to take that up with Kavanaugh.

Note that if Travis believes Kavanaugh is a rapist, it's not libel.
 
People being responsible for themselves is not cruel. It's how you should live your life. Of course your opinion is going to be different.

There are consequences for each action you take in life. Perhaps people should give up the idea of "gimme mah free stuff" and purchase the goods and services they require. Capitalism. It's not for the lazy.

People that are able to work, should. No exceptions.

The privileged always have this flawed "if I can do it, so can they" view. Its just a right-wing white entitlement fantasy. Reality is way different from the ideal fantasy world in which you appear to live.

Get out and work in a soup kitchen; help out at a men's shelter; go into a supermarket and spend a few dollars buying some steak and potato pies to give to the homeless. Find out what the real world is like instead of hiding behind your white picket fence with wifey, 2½ kids and the family pet Labrador.
 
Last edited:
I paid for both kids to be born in full. There was no insurance company involved. As for my kids getting medical care, they had the best.
What if one had needed a heart transplant? I hope you were lucky and have 2 healthy kids. Luck does indeed affect people's life situations.
 
Last edited:
What if one had needed a heart transplant? I hope you were lucky and have 2 healthy kids. Luck does indeed affect people's life situations.

The inability to see that not everyone can be successful is a common trait of privileged people. They seem to think that life is only about choices and disregard all other factors that one does not have influence over.

The thought process is what leads them to think the poor are all lazy scum. That women who get raped deserve it.
 
Last edited:
The privileged always have this flawed "if I can do it, so can they" view. Its just a right-wing white entitlement fantasy. Reality is way different from the ideal fantasy world in which you appear to live.

Get out and work in a soup kitchen; help out at a men's shelter; go into a supermarket and spend a few dollars buying some steak and potato pies to give to the homeless. Find out what the real world is like instead of hiding behind your white picket fence with wifey, 2½ kids and the family pet Labrador.
To be fair, we don't actually know his life situation
 
The thought process is what leads them to think the poor are all lazy scum. That women who get raped deserve it.
And since women who have sex deserve to get pregnant, it's far more important to teach them a lesson than it is to broaden access to contraception and reduce harm to society.
 
And since women who have sex deserve to get pregnant, it's far more important to teach them a lesson than it is to broaden access to contraception and reduce harm to society.

Yes, because sex should only be for breeding...........


unless you're a guy.
 
The privileged always have this flawed "if I can do it, so can they" view. Its just a right-wing white entitlement fantasy. Reality is way different from the ideal fantasy world in which you appear to live.

I think it's a natural consequence of the "I'm self made and I had no advantage/help/luck involved in getting where I am" belief that so many seem to subscribe to.
 
To be fair, we don't actually know his life situation

OK, but with his appalling attitude toward the poor, the downtrodden, the vulnerable and the disadvantaged, its not hard to take an educated guess.

I'm 63...this type of self-interested, "I'm alright Jack" thinking is nothing new to me.
 
I think it's a natural consequence of the "I'm self made and I had no advantage/help/luck involved in getting where I am" belief that so many seem to subscribe to.


Which is always BS. It's like that experiment where people played Monopoly but some started the game with more money. Naturally they tended to win but they refused to believe that the extra money gave them an advantage.
 
Which is always BS. It's like that experiment where people played Monopoly but some started the game with more money. Naturally they tended to win but they refused to believe that the extra money gave them an advantage.

Yes, two of the most outspokenly "self made" company owners I've worked for had inherited successful small businesses from their parents at the beginning of a time of massive growth in their sector. But that was irrelevant to their success, apparently:rolleyes:.
 
To his credit, Kavanaugh didn't like liberals to start with.

That makes me chuckle, considering what "liberal" actually means. It's like you're downright admitting to wishing for an autocratic regime.

Checks in... shockingly enough, the thread has degenerated furtherfrom last night’s posts advocating attacking Kavanaugh’s daughters.

Oh well, can’t say I surprised.

I love how you make this claim without specifying what you're talking about. It's clear now that you're just trying to gaslight those reading this thread. It's ideological agenda, not skepticism on your part.

Lol, remember when the pathetic Dems used a grieving father as a set up where they had him try and do that and Kavanaugh had no idea who that guy was?

Is any of this factual, or did you just make it up?

Seriously, how desperate are you guys?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom