• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Behavior of UK Police officers.

I appreciate what you mean, sure different groups require different strategies, but the challenges in everyday policing such as lack of reporting from such groups, intelligence gathering, concealment etc are pretty much the same, whatever the group and their reasons are. I was viewing that from the perspective of routine policing, rather than terrorism.

The problems may be broadly similar but more pertinent is that they differ significantly in the challenges they present. For example, certain Jewish communities are even more insular than the Muslim ones, but because little serious crime occurs within them it's not a big deal as far as law enforcement goes.

Sexual assault and predatory behavior does occur pretty much everywhere, but a claim of organized rape gangs in every major city, Muslim or not, probably requires it's own thread.

And it has one, or more than one. The last one I contributed to was, I guess, a couple of years back. There may be more but I miss out years here and there.

I won't rule out that such things might be happening, sex trafficking of many different kinds is a genuine problem, but not specifically a Muslim thing to my knowledge. Happy to learn more of course if you could provide some sources.

Where to start? First, understand that none of this is seriously disputed. Everybody from the Home Secretary to the Human Rights and Equality chairman acknowledges the disproportionate criminality of Muslims, primarily Pakistani Muslims, in the area of rape gangs.

Police and social services from one end of the country to another covered up, and actively facilitated, the rape of young girls for 30 years. This is detailed in the extremely watered-down Alexis Jay report, but at least it was an acknowledgement.

Reading the accounts of the people, and girls, involved, some reports stick in the mind:

* Police find a 13 year old girl having sex with four Pakistani adults in a car park at 2am. They let the men go free and arrest the girl for drunk and disorderly.

* A 13/14 year old girl is repeatedly taken by Pakistani men to a house to be gang raped. The police refuse to act. The father of the girl does to the house to get his daughter back. The police turn up, arrest him, and leave the girl with the men.

* Girls as young as 11 have been raped by 30 men in a night, had petrol poured over them, were beaten and strangled unconscious, had their tongues nailed to tables, were branded with red hot irons, had their houses firebombed and their families assaulted and were even murdered. For 30 years this kind of thing went on up and down the country . People who don't know the facts say, OK, but these men are being jailed. Yes, a few now are being held to account, but for 30 years up until around 2010 they did this up and down the country with the full knowledge of the authorities and nobody did a thing. Nobody knows how many girls were abused but I would be astonished if it's not in the multiple tens of thousands. And most of this is from 2% of the population - Muslim males.

This is interesting and if true definitely warrants it's own thread. 300% over-representation (by population percentage) is a staggering amount and certainly warrants discussion. However in this particular thread it is also completely contradictory to the OP that Muslims are running wild and not being challenged by the Police.

Both can be true. Well, the first one is true, the second is hyperbole, but that doesn't mean there's not truth in it. Rape gangs still operate in every town, they haven't gone away. Indeed, some of the victims, when asked if the problem has gone away say no, it's worse now than it ever was. The police were forced to act after decades of doing nothing, and worse, facilitating the rapists, but to imagine they're now on top of the situation, or even trying their best, is absurd.

Well I'm not going to argue against the idea media reporting can be a problem or can provide an unbalanced perspective. As I mentioned with Baylor, Rotherham was horrific and I'm not going to defend the failings that were uncovered, but at least some progress has made since. I won't pretend that such things can't happen again but I hope that we can do a better job to prevent anything happening on that scale.

I wouldn't hold your breath. There's nothing special about Rotherham. Or Telford, or Newcastle, or Oxford. This is happening everywhere that insular Muslim communities exist and the police do just enough, in cahoots with the mainstream media, to counter claims of apathy. "You're not tackling the rape gangs!" "Wrong, see we charged a dozen men last month." A dozen. You're looking at thousands upon thousands, and most will never see justice.

The Manchester bombing was terrible, targeting civilians is always reprehensible and feels even worse when children are involved. Radical ideology is a serious problem and a difficult one to address. Islamic terrorism is obviously the current ideology that has led directly to attacks, but it isn't the only one and it isn't solved by alienating the people who can help us best defeat it.

They isolate themselves. The level of racism, bigotry and hatred of non-Muslims arising from conservative Islam cannot be understated. Again, I make the distinction between Muslims in general and the insular Muslim communities in the UK. Because that's what this conversation always comes back to - "not all Muslims." And that's right, not all Muslims, a minority of Muslims, but a proportionally large number.

Contrary to some opinions not every community has links to terrorism, or supports radical Islam. They are not all in isolation or anti police and the majority actively condemn such actions and co-operate with authorities. Of course there are exceptions, in any group you apply a label too there will be a wide variety of individuals, good and bad. There are real problems, some of which include people who are Muslim, but the reason I de-lurked is that inaccurate misinformation and hyperbole. deliberately misleading propaganda and vilifying entire groups, are good examples of those problems. It's the same kind of manipulation often used to recruit extremists and we should do better, not stoop to their level.

That's why I make the distinction I made above. Make no mistake, these insular Muslim ghettos are terrible places. This doesn't reflect in any way on the Muslim who might sit next to you at work, or the Muslim you go out to lunch with.
 
Jesus Christ, what a tragic post.

Because it pointed out that you were utterly wrong.

Now if you said that many Muslims tended to be against homosexuality as a matter of doctrine, I'd agree - but point out that the same is true of many Christians.
 
Because it pointed out that you were utterly wrong.

Well if you want to be clever, no, it doesn't. Five hundred British Muslims were interviewed for that poll. Some, clearly, were gay. Let's say 25. Whilst these 25 people are likely to privately believe their sexuality is not immoral (although you never know), they chose to condemn it. So what's the difference? 100% of Muslims believe homosexuality to be immoral vs 100% of Muslims maintain homosexuality is immoral (but the gay ones probably don't mean it). Pedantry is a poor substitute for honest debate.

Now if you said that many Muslims tended to be against homosexuality as a matter of doctrine, I'd agree - but point out that the same is true of many Christians.

Would you like me to go get the figures?
 
Wasn't the Rotherham scandal about predominately Pakistani Muslims and not just Muslims in general?

Correct. Most of these insular communities originate from conservative regions of Pakistan, less frequently Bangladesh or Afghanistan. Edit: and it bears saying these these communities are so isolated from the wider UK that they are even more religiously conservative (extreme) that the countries they come from.
 
Last edited:
Well, here they are anyway...

However, when asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed that homosexuality should be legal in Britain, 18% said they agreed and 52% said they disagreed, compared with 5% among the public at large who disagreed.

I'm not gay and I'm not a gay rights campaigner, but AFAIK that 52% and that 5% can go to hell.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...se-of-belonging-poll-homosexuality-sharia-law

Also, and this is only guesswork, I bet that those 18% of Muslims who are OK with gay rights are those who are integrated into wider society. You know, the Muslims who are your friends and colleagues.
 
Last edited:
Also, and this is only guesswork, I bet that those 18% of Muslims who are OK with gay rights are those who are integrated into wider society. You know, the Muslims who are your friends and colleagues.
"The good ones."


Racist ******** never changes.
 
woah, it's not racist to point out that a lot of followers of islam, when polled, are not ok with things that most people in the UK (minus the Christians) deem to be OK.
It's racist to imply that only the followers of Islam who agree with most people in the UK can be one's friends and colleagues.
 
It's racist to imply that only the followers of Islam who agree with most people in the UK can be one's friends and colleagues.

And claim that no Muslims in Britain support gay rights.
 
It's racist to imply that only the followers of Islam who agree with most people in the UK can be one's friends and colleagues.

First, it isn't racist, second it's not what I said. Aside from that you're spot on.
 
And claim that no Muslims in Britain support gay rights.

Instead of these little digs, why not provide some evidence of your claim? What percentage of UK Muslims support gay rights, and please link to your evidence.
 
How many evangelical Christians think that homosexuality is immoral or how many think that it should be illegal?
 
First, it isn't racist, second it's not what I said. Aside from that you're spot on.
Except of course that it is racist, and it is what you said.
Also, and this is only guesswork, I bet that those 18% of Muslims who are OK with gay rights are those who are integrated into wider society. You know, the Muslims who are your friends and colleagues.
And, guess what? The white people in the UK who are not OK with gay rights are integrated into wider society. The ones in the US are, too. Hell, many of them are highly placed and are running our governments.
 
Except of course that it is racist, and it is what you said.

You quoted me right there and you insist on misrepresenting my words. I can't help you out.

And, guess what? The white people in the UK who are not OK with gay rights are integrated into wider society.

Yes, that 5% is. Like I just said. And they can go to hell. Like I just said. I imagine you think I said something completely different but again, I can't help you out.

The ones in the US are, too. Hell, many of them are highly placed and are running our governments.

Here we go. Yes but but but... in the US... This thread is about the UK, not the US. I don't care about the US and I don't care about your government. Have you had experience of living in the UK?
 
Except of course that it is racist, and it is what you said.

And, guess what? The white people in the UK who are not OK with gay rights are integrated into wider society. The ones in the US are, too. Hell, many of them are highly placed and are running our governments.
yep, religion has a lot to answer for.
 

Back
Top Bottom