New SCOTUS Judge II: The Wrath of Kavanaugh

While I totally agree that this indeed constitutes a school uniform, I believe it's moot for the sake of this particular area of discussion: I think Dr Ford could only reasonably be referring to sports uniform (and specifically football uniform). Male school sports jocks the world over (certainly in the UK and US) are well-known for their propensity to wear liveried clothes bearing the identity of their team to social gatherings. It immediately identifies them to everyone else as a top sportsman and reinforces their own egoes.

It would be interesting and useful if someone were to ask Dr Ford to clarify exactly what she meant by "uniform" in her testimony. As I say above, I think it's highly likely that she'd say she was referring to liveried school football apparel.

it wasn't Ford.

It was Avenatti's grifter client in the context of walking back all of her ridiculous claims
 
Soon we filed round and formed under fire in 2nd posit. left of a N.Y. Regt. (34th New York) and opened fire on the Reb line wh. (sic) was visible--Our fire was soon stopped (by order) and we could see in the field (where our 3d position was later) Rebs moving by twos and threes-apparently broken up

Oliver Wendall Holms while in his 20s.

In his second year Marshall participated in a sit-in protest against segregation at a local movie theater....

Marshall represented Donald Gaines Murray, a black Amherst College graduate with excellent credentials, who was denied admission to the University of Maryland Law School because of its segregation policy.

Thurgood Marshal in his 20s.


Consequent to his defense of an African American who was forced into a form of commercial slavery after incarceration, Black was befriended by A. O. Lane, a judge connected with the case. When Lane was elected to the Birmingham City Commission in 1911, he asked Black to serve as a police court judge
(Age 26)


What Hugo Black did in his 20s.

According to the police report, Kavanaugh was reluctant to say whether "he threw the ice or not."

Kavanaugh in his 20s.
 
He also says:

"I think we are unanimous that any girls we can beg to stay there are welcome with open...." (I can't imagine why he chose not to finish that sentence.)

"The danger of eviction is great and that would suck because of the money and because this week has big potential. (Interpret as wish)."

He sounds charming.

What do you think the FFFF stands for? In my day which is only a few years earlier, it meant Find them, Feel them, **** them and Forget them.
 
Both are unsubstantiated statements (Swetnicks, and the Ketterer letter) one accuses someone of criminal activity, and then later goes on in an interview and changes up stories on those statements. The other gives a character statement on someone that is non criminal.

Which is worse? Lying about someone drugging and gang raping people, or saying someone likes to have sex a lot or with a lot of people and not being proven false by your own later statements?

Have you compared Swetnicks interview and her statment? If not -- maybe you should.

You're moving the goalpost here. Your post that I addressed had nothing to do with the credibility or veracity of Swetnick's claims or which was "worse". Nice attempt but it's a no go.
 
Trump has escaped his handlers again:

President Donald Trump openly mocked Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who testified last week that she was sexually assaulted by his Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, during a rally in Mississippi on Tuesday night. As the crowd of supporters cheered, the president imitated Ford saying “I don’t remember” or “I don’t know” about various details related to the alleged attack. “But I had one beer, that’s the only thing I remember,” he added. It was a sharp contrast to the way Trump described her testimony less than a week ago. “I thought her testimony was very compelling, and she looks like a very fine woman to me,” Trump said at the time, calling her a “very credible witness.”

Linky.
 
You're moving the goalpost here. Your post that I addressed had nothing to do with the credibility or veracity of Swetnick's claims or which was "worse". Nice attempt but it's a no go.

Hilarious. No posts were moved, but someone did lie and prove their statement to be false on the most vile of accusations.

If you cannot see which is worse, I pity you.
 
I'm really curious if this guy was for real or a pretender. You know, the kind of guy who was all talk or if he was this pig of a human being. I knew both in college...so he could be either.

He was either a pig of a human being, or he wanted all his friends to think he was a pig of a human being.

It's not exactly a distinction without a difference, but it's not far off.
 
Hilarious. No posts were moved, but someone did lie and prove their statement to be false on the most vile of accusations.

If you cannot see which is worse, I pity you.

Again, nice try.

(backing away very slowly making no sudden moves to startle River)
 
I never knew there was a song. Thanks.

It goes along with his remark about being a member of the Renate alumni.

I'm really curious if this guy was for real or a pretender. You know, the kind of guy who was all talk or if he was this pig of a human being. I knew both in college...so he could be either.

His rant from last Thursday supports both interpretations.
 
I love how the machinations of tribalism and the outrage machine have pushed it so far away from any question of whether or Kavanaugh would actually make a good Justice.

We're a dozen nested sub-topics deep in "Now prove a reversed burden of proof strawman negative because asterisks."

At this point somebody might as well come in and try to prove he'd make a good Justice with Bayesian statistics.
 
protip: Before making such a stupid and embarrassing comment, note that it happened at a rally and is therefore on video.

LOL!

Things that Confuse the Big Dog

1) Asterisks
2) Uniforms
3) Video Recordings

https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/02/trump-mocks-christine-fords/

The WH transcripts altered Trump's comment to ""That's okay. I know you're not thanking. You never do." After they were called out, they corrected it to fit what he had actually said which was "That's okay. I know you're not thinking. You never do."

What liars they are. "Thanking" doesn't even make sense in the sentence. This is not the first time the WH transcripts have not accurately reflected what was said.
 

Back
Top Bottom