• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Behavior of UK Police officers.

British Police too scared to tell Muslims they can't legally pray in royal parks

 
I'm sure you are not. Because you stay in the area still under UK control. What little is left of it.

Oooo! Please tell us where the "no-go" areas are? It really would be helpful, because despite living, working, socialising, shopping, etc., in London for the last 17 years, I don't know which bits I should have been avoiding.
 
Last edited:
Except that the video doesn't show what its title claims. It shows a slowed down extract from a much longer incident, and then repeats it. Let's take a look at what actually happened:



The selective video starts around 9 seconds in and ends 14 seconds later, fading out before.... the suspect gets TASERed.

All you're doing is cherry-picking disparate exceptional events and distortions to construct a false reality to suit your own bias and bigotry.

And look at the body language of the police officer by the railing and of the teenagers he's talking to at this part of the clip after the knife-wielding man has been put into the police van.

Neither look as though they are particularly fearful

https://youtu.be/YXHorIrLFIc?t=3m34s
 
Failure to understand difference between "park rules" and "criminal law" duly noted.

Hmm. I think that wakeupslave dot com is probably a bit of a conspiracy site. Although I am only basing it on the domain name

Are you telling me that it is misrepresenting what it is showing?
 
I'm not the least bit surprised the Brits are defending the cowardice of their officers. The outcome of this 11 on 1 confrontation was a clear victory for the criminal. More importantly, it was a moral victory for criminal gangs. If British police can't handle an 11 on 1 fight without cowering first, then it shows how easily they can be defeated. The criminal elements in the UK watch these videos. That's why they easily have their way with British officers and declare swaths of land as their own.
 
I'm not the least bit surprised the Brits are defending the cowardice of their officers. The outcome of this 11 on 1 confrontation was a clear victory for the criminal. More importantly, it was a moral victory for criminal gangs. If British police can't handle an 11 on 1 fight without cowering first, then it shows how easily they can be defeated. The criminal elements in the UK watch these videos. That's why they easily have their way with British officers and declare swaths of land as their own.

In what way was it a victory for him to be arrested and for there to be no casualties, and for the police to have used the minimal force required to arrest him?

I'd rather the whole social structure was such that the police thought it worthwhile completely outnumbering the knife-wielding criminal than an outcome where lethal force was used when it obviously wasn't needed.
 
Hmm. I think that wakeupslave dot com is probably a bit of a conspiracy site. Although I am only basing it on the domain name

Are you telling me that it is misrepresenting what it is showing?

Who cares? It depicts UK officers with their tail between their legs. You'd rather argue the difference between a rule and a law than show disgust at the officers' cowardice.
 
I'm not the least bit surprised the Brits are defending the cowardice of their officers. The outcome of this 11 on 1 confrontation was a clear victory for the criminal. More importantly, it was a moral victory for criminal gangs. If British police can't handle an 11 on 1 fight without cowering first, then it shows how easily they can be defeated. The criminal elements in the UK watch these videos.

A "clear victory for the criminal" as it "got pepper sprayed and then TASERed in the face, arrested, and bundled into a police van." And seriously, they're not "cowering" but rather distracting and containing the suspect until the officer with the TASER can get a clear shot. Obviously it's not very helpful which bigots and liars edit these videos to give a false impression to would-be criminals, but that'll be the fault of the bigots and liars, not the police.

That's why they easily have their way with British officers and declare swaths of land as their own.

Which "swaths" would they be? Still waiting for you to identify them.
 
In what way was it a victory for him to be arrested and for there to be no casualties, and for the police to have used the minimal force required to arrest him?

I'd rather the whole social structure was such that the police thought it worthwhile completely outnumbering the knife-wielding criminal than an outcome where lethal force was used when it obviously wasn't needed.

It shows it takes an incredible amount of police resources to apprehend one lone suspect. The incompetency is on display for other criminals to exploit. I stated in my OP, I'd rather not have my police be so incompetent that power vacuums emerge leaving citizens vulnerable to criminals gangs.
 
I'm not the least bit surprised the Brits are defending the cowardice of their officers. The outcome of this 11 on 1 confrontation was a clear victory for the criminal. More importantly, it was a moral victory for criminal gangs. If British police can't handle an 11 on 1 fight without cowering first, then it shows how easily they can be defeated. The criminal elements in the UK watch these videos. That's why they easily have their way with British officers and declare swaths of land as their own.

winner1.jpg

winner2.jpg

Don't you think it was a bit dishonest of the initial video editor to stop just before he ended up getting effectively stopped by the police? It changes the narrative quite a bit.
 
Who cares? It depicts UK officers with their tail between their legs.

Containment and distraction is not "running away."

You'd rather argue the difference between a rule and a law than show disgust at the officers' cowardice.

Park rules are not laws. Nobody is going to get arrested for ignoring the "keep off the grass" signs, either.
 
If it takes 11 people to subdue 1 person, that 1 person is the winner.

Not if there are those resources available.

The Met decided that was a reasonable use of their resources.

It's better to have the option of overwhelming power to contain and dissuade potential trouble rather than too little and a struggle where someone gets injured.

Personally, I think that it's more cowardly to shoot someone who is lying on the grounds with his hands up.

But that's just me. (And most people).
 
Zombies are at an all-time low level, but the fear of zombies could be high
 

Back
Top Bottom