For one thing, studies...
And just what 'studies' are you referring to?
...have shown that women are less and less able to form a strong pair bond as their number of partners increases.
I rather suspect those making the study don't quite understand the difference between correlation and causation.
Women who are virgins at time of marriage report happier marriages and happier lives, too.
I've seen references to those types of studies. They often are incomplete (i.e. don't have enough details to see if controls were properly implemented).
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...lly-show-abstinence-marriage-makes-better-sex
It helps with establishing paternity...
We have DNA tests for that now.
it helps with encouraging earlier age of first pregnancy,
I find that rather ironic that you would claim that was a 'good thing' considering I think it was you that was complaining about overpopulation. Sounds to me we'd be better off delaying pregnancy if you wanted to limit population growth.
it helps to discourage a generally degenerate lifestyle
"Degenerate" is a judgement that has no real value.
and it also would help discourage a LOT of things feminists and women in general are complaining about right now everywhere you look.
No, just no.
Women are complaining about sexual assault. (See: the #metoo movement). Going back to the days of "one woman one man forever", in the days when a man could legally rape his wife like you seem to want to do is definitely not what feminists want.
The kind of society where you are expected to dress modestly,
Why is that considered a good or bad thing?
court a woman respectfully and only have sex with one person after you've married them, is not the kind of society where you've got this level of "upskirting", people feeling used and discarded
Actually people were used and discarded in the past. Its just that because of society pressures, the women that were used had to hide their shame.
Which were rather significant problems in the past too.
people failing to perpetuate their genetic line because they burned through their fertile years in some meaningless job or pointless degree or just sleeping around but never settling down...
If we need to reduce human overpopulation then some genetic lines will end up ending.
The kind of events Dr. Ford described would be far less likely in such a society.
No, they'd be more common. Just hidden from sight better.
The mental image evoked by this turning of Brett's own HS lingo into an apt 'punishment' for their blindly partisan support is delicious.
