Cont: Breaking: Mueller Grand Jury charges filed, arrests as soon as Monday pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
blutoski said:
And it's something the IRS would be very interested to hear about, since it usually means tax evasion. The tax would be assessed at fair market value usually.

You can get away with this sort of thing for a used car, but a mansion is worth the IRS' resources.
03233
Click to expand...
It's called a sweetheart deal, and it's common to get away with it.
 
quadraginta said:
Trump's lead attorney has just stated in public that Trump's tweets constitute testimonial evidence?

I'm not sure that's going to help Trump a whole lot.
Click to expand...

From the outside this is quite amazing to watch, having been too young for Watergate it feels like my chance to see history in the making. Giuliani's strategy to get out of the hole appears to be 'keep digging'.
 
blutoski said:
And it's something the IRS would be very interested to hear about, since it usually means tax evasion. The tax would be assessed at fair market value usually.

You can get away with this sort of thing for a used car, but a mansion is worth the IRS' resources.
03233
Click to expand...


ORA-03233: unable to extend table XXX subpartition yyy in tablespace zzz

​
 
quadraginta said:
Trump's lead attorney has just stated in public that Trump's tweets constitute testimonial evidence?

I'm not sure that's going to help Trump a whole lot.
Click to expand...

There was an article the other day in which one of Trump's former lawyers was quoted as saying that Giulliani was harming Trump's case "immesurably", although I forget which specific stupid statement he was referring to when he said it.
 
So, you're saying that this could end up being an IRS civil case?

Because there is no way a criminal case would go that far back.
 
quadraginta said:
Trump's lead attorney has just stated in public that Trump's tweets constitute testimonial evidence?

I'm not sure that's going to help Trump a whole lot.
Click to expand...

Actually, it gets him out from testimony under oath. Tweets aren't made under oath, so the "lying under oath" goes away.

ETA: Or at least they think it does.
 
quadraginta said:
Trump's lead attorney has just stated in public that Trump's tweets constitute testimonial evidence?

I'm not sure that's going to help Trump a whole lot.
Click to expand...

Only for replacing Trumps testimony. He was adamant that tweets could not be used to help show obstruction. :boggled:
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
There was an article the other day in which one of Trump's former lawyers was quoted as saying that Giulliani was harming Trump's case "immesurably", although I forget which specific stupid statement he was referring to when he said it.
Click to expand...

Gas-lighting.

Those who cannot think critically and only exist in their own (Fox News) echo chamber will read these tweets and believe them.

We didn't collude.
If there was collusion Trump Sr. didn't know about it.
Collusion isn't a crime.

The write of said article who claimed RG was harming Trump's case is looking past the gas-lighting. Trump's base might be believing what RG is claiming; and therefore if there are impeachment proceedings or anything similar, Trump's base will be (more) up in arms.

At least that's what I think.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom