• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
The smoke that Mills was touting as containing dark matter hydrinos in this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xueLsn-XFCc) seemed pretty interactive to me. After all it was visible and floated in air currents.

Those are hydrino hydride compounds, involving hydrino H- bound to metallic compounds. Dihydrino gas is not reactive like the hydrino anion H-.

By the way, shouldn't the independent labs to which it was sent for analysis have reported back by now? What were their findings?

I suspect those results will be available in the next quarterly report, which I eagerly await.
 
Those are hydrino hydride compounds, involving hydrino H- bound to metallic compounds. Dihydrino gas is not reactive like the hydrino anion H-.

At least that's what Mills says. Never mind the fact he's published NO research to support those claims.

I suspect those results will be available in the next quarterly report, which I eagerly await.

Just recycle any one of the past reports over the last 20 years where he promises a revolutionary commercial product in 6 to 18 months.
 
You've cleverly left out the fact, also stated in that article, that experiments have universally and overwhelmingly violated Bell's inequalities. The predictions of quantum mechanics are found to be correct, and this together with Bell's Theorem therefore demonstrates that no physical theory of locally hidden variables can predict the overwhelming weight of data that shows that Bell's inequalities are universally violated. There was, in fact, no exaggeration.

Dave
An example of Mills (or markie's version of Mills) being, as they say, "economical with the truth"?

If so, it's certainly consistent; Mills has a history of such "economy", ~30 years' of it in fact.
 
Dark matter has been observed (indirectly) in nature. Past tense. No problem.

As I have said, it has been observed, albeit indirectly. That is, its various gravitational effects have been observed.

Others have complained that if hydrinos are more stable than ordinary hydrogen, why isn't most of the universe in hydrino form by now? (According to Mills, it is!)

So we have a gap: Dark Matter. And we have a "god": the Hydrino. Textbook in my opinion.

But IF dark matter is Hydrinos and Hydrinos are detectable. Why do we not detect them in nature? They should be frigging everywhere!?
 
It is largely an assumption that dark matter has no electromagnetic interactions, and that it is exotic. Otherwise, the reasoning goes, we would have found it by now on earth. But to find it, one must know what to look for. No one but Mills and others who have dared to be involved in his hydrino research know what to look and how to look for it.
Mills' magic re dark matter and hydrinos may seem vaguely plausible if you stick with popsci explanations and if you are not involved in research related to it.

Just as ISF members who have relevant expertise and experience in engineering, physics, chemistry (and more) has said - via many posts here - that Mills' magic is just that (magic) re so many of his claims, so too with dark matter.

Those astronomers, astrophysicists, and particle physicists who study dark matter (in a general sense) will instantly recognize that Mills' writing on this topic is nonsense (or magic, if you prefer). And it's not for lack of interest! What dark matter actually is is a very hot topic, with thousands of exceedingly clever people working on one aspect or another of it, full-time. If Mills' ideas on this had legs, someone would have picked at least a core aspect up and ran with it, likely over a decade ago; instead, those who've come across it regard it as crackpot nonsense at best (I prefer "magic").

Again, markie, you do Mills no favors at all by trying to present and defend Mills on this, and even fewer favors by posting stuff that's nothing better than cherry-picked popsci.
 
But IF dark matter is Hydrinos and Hydrinos are detectable. Why do we not detect them in nature? They should be frigging everywhere!?

Markie indicated above:

Dihydrino gas is not reactive like the hydrino anion H-.

But in that case one of the recent attempts to detect dark matter particle collisions with ordinary matter, such as the XENON1T experiment, should have succeeded.
 
So we have a gap: Dark Matter. And we have a "god": the Hydrino. Textbook in my opinion.

But IF dark matter is Hydrinos and Hydrinos are detectable. Why do we not detect them in nature? They should be frigging everywhere!?

I was about to post similar.
 
[appropriate disclaimer]

It's been staring at us, for years!!! :jaw-dropp

ISF members will know that there are several, very long, threads on variants of the Electric Universe. You will also know that the high priests of this cult fervently believe that giant bolts of lightning carved out the Grand Canyon, etc. That Venus was spat out of Saturn. That comets are electrical discharges. That The Ancients faithfully recorded all this in their myths and legends. And so on.

Now we all also know that hydrinos can generate fantastic quantities of energy, in short periods of time. That hydrinos and hydrino-compounds are hard to detect (except by Mills et al.). And so on.

Now here's the "two plus two" part: the EU cultists have it wrong, it's not electricity, but hydrinos!! :eye-poppi

Due to a unique cosmic coincidence, vast numbers of hydrinos assembled in Saturn, a few thousand years ago, and the giant explosion expelled a mass that later became Venus. As the nascent Venus passed Mars, some residual hydrinos were created, resulting in the creation of Valles Marineris; ditto Earth and Grand Canyon. And by some hydrino-mediated reactions which Mills has yet to explore, comet's comas and tails are created. The reason no one has worked this comet part out yet is because the spectroscopy misses hydrinos and hydrino compounds, and because hydrinos do not react electromagnetically.

When can I collect my Nobel Prize? :p

[/appropriate disclaimer]
 
It is one thing to develop a light bulb that works briefly. It is entirely another to develop a light bulb that can last a significant amount of time and that people would buy. Historically, it took decades.

The hydrino reaction is real. The experimental light bulb has been lit. What remains now is to make it good enough to be marketable.
Sorry flash cubes are already obsolete technology and never really actually generated energy anyway. They did have huge power densities, but that was from burning highly reactive metallic compounds like silver fulminate or other metals like magnesium usually. Once the reactants finished burning, the flash stopped.

The reason Mills hasn't yet has nothing to do with marketability Markie. Not even Mills claims anything as silly as that. There are gazillions of things we discovered about the Universe that still as of yet never produced anything marketable. Never will either. You will NEVER be able to go down to the farmers market and buy a dozen black holes for dinner! But we do have evidence they exist.

Focus Markie. This is your hero Mills talking. Listen carefully.

"One goal is to prove our power source to the world in the
near term through power measurements, identification of
the hydrino products of the reaction, and engineered
power systems.
"

Mills says his GOAL for the future is to prove its existence through power measurements! Focus hard Markie. A goal for the future is something not done yet! Think clearly. If Mills had unequivocal power measurements proving hydrino technology and excluding all other reasonable sources for those anomalous readings, this would not be a near term goal, it would be an accomplished task. It wouldn't need to be in a finished marketable form, just functioning enough to prove the technology.

Next part is similar. Mills says his GOAL for the future is "identification of the hydrino products of the reaction". Again this near term goal would not exist if those so called "hydrino chrystals" we discussed before had actually been identified and actually contained any novel hydrino compounds. They were not and have never been found to contain any hydrinos. NONE Even Mills understands this is a needed near term goal, not an already accomplished task. Only silly you clings to the last failed attempt to identify hydrinos in any products of the reactants from his equipment. Mills certainly understands no hydrinos were found yet. Otherwise it would not be a goal for the future! D'oh. Any compound would do. Whether marketable or not is irrelevant.

The final part is where you picked up the marketability. This indeed would be a near term goal after the above two near term goals were accomplished. First show they function or exist (not done yet) then engineer something marketable. That of course hasn't yet been done either, because the first part hasn't been done yet!
 
Last edited:
An ignorant statement because I have quoted the Lambs shift values several times

It is still very good agreement (I think to about 10 significant digits)....
Replies to
26 July 2018 markie: A blatant "his own straw men" lie when it is textbook physics and scientific literature that refutes Mills work (his book)
with
27 July 2018 markie: An ignorant "10 significant digits" statement when I have quoted the Lamb shift values several times and it is in Mills book!
For example, read 25 July 2018 markie: A "within experimental limits" lie since page 155 of Mills book has no experimental limits.
Mills deluded book has 1057.09 MHz.
The measured value is 1057.845 (3) MHz. These are not in "close agreement".

The calculated value is 1057.833 (4) MHz and that is described as close. It is 10 times closer than Mills hopefully* accidental value.

* Mills book is so full of ignorance, delusions and lies that it is obviously a waste of time checking his physics or math in detail. This may be another lie where he faked his calculations to get as close to the measured Lambs shift as possible. On the other hand, a valid classical (as in actual physics) treatment of a real hydrogen atom emitting a real photon might give a value close to the Lamb shift.
 
Last edited:
1/α = 137.035999139(31)
is the CODATA 2014 recommended value.

But the QED theoretically calculated value is
1/α = 137.035999173(35)
based on thousands of 10th order Feynman diagrams.

That's a disagreement, but you don't seem concerned about that.
No I am not concerned because I know about physics. I am concerned about your ignorance though.
The QED theoretically calculated value is based on valid physics.
The uncertainly in the QED theoretically calculated value is the uncertainly that Mills does not give :eek:! Notice how small it is when using valid physics.
The QED theoretically calculated value is the current approximation which is what "10th order Feynman diagrams" tells us. Anomalous magnetic dipole moment gives the 1948  first order in fine structure (alpha) and the current 5th order in alpha results. Someone is probably working on the next order.

Mills has a very probably once and forever value of the hydrogen Lamb shift. Mills very probably cannot get any closer to the measured hydrogen Lamb shift.
 
Last edited:
You should know that it is still an open question about how much dark matter may interact, besides gravitationally.
Missed the point I put in bold so:
Read 25 July 2018 markie: Still does not understand that Mills lies about dark matter interacting electromagnetically so that it can be his hydrino delusion.
The claim that electromagnetically interacting hydrinos is refuted by the evidence that dark matter does not interact electromagnetically.


Dark matter might not be interactive after all is evidence that dark matter does not interact electromagnetically. There was an observation that a galaxy had become separated from the dark matter surrounding it as predicted with dark matter interacting with non-gravity forces. New data says the dark matter did not separate and thus does not support dark matter with forces other than gravity. That agrees with all of the other evidence that dark matter passes though normal matter, i.e. does not measurably interact electromagnetically.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you could calculate the propagated error

He could have, but he is being succinct. Perhaps you could calculate the propagated error from the values of the fundamental constants used.
Wow a need to be "succinct" in a book that has over 1600 pages. Mills did not bother to write maybe 3 characters "(X)" or maybe another sentence!
26 July 2018: Page 155: "1057.09 MHz" ignorance about basic scientific scholarship.

markie knows that I have known for 18 months that Mills book is full of ignorance, delusions and lies. Why should I waste my time to perhaps confirm yet another lie?
26 July 2018 markie: Usual unthinking spamming of Mills ignorant, deluded and lying book starts with Part I: 37 items of ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book and the first item is dated 25 January 2017!

The burden of proof in science is on the person making the claim or their supporters so:
27 July 2018 markie: Perhaps you could calculate the propagated error from the values of the fundamental constants used?
Or contact Mills and ask for the worked out error propagation including his work (think about your high school science papers).
 
Last edited:
An ignorant fantasy about the forces on a charge in a uniformly charged sphere

We've been through this before. ...
27 July 2018 markie: An ignorant fantasy about the forces on a charge in a uniformly charged sphere
What he misses out is that the "attractive force from the proton" will pull on the sphere equally in all directions. It is obvious for a proton at the center of the sphere that the net force will be zero. It needs a bit of math to see that the net force is zero for the proton everywhere within the sphere.

There are excellent reasons why Mills electron as a charged atom sized sphere is deluded. The measured size of bound electrons is less than the size of a proton. Electrons, positrons, alpha particles, and neutrons from radioactive decay pass though that delusion without any measurable effects. No sign of the delusion from scattering of charged particles.

This disconnection between the proton and electron is why Mills electron delusion is actually insane. Even markie seems to know now that the net force is zero for the proton everywhere within Mills electron delusion. That is basic electromagnetics taught in high schools or early university physics classes. That is basic electromagnetics that Mills has to know. It is literally insanely ignorant for Mills not to address that basic flaw.

markie emulates Mills spouting of delusions with his own ignorant fantasy about moving charges + magnetic fields magically holding the proton in the center.
Less fanciful would be citing where Mills addresses that flaw with physics and math. markie?
 
Last edited:
No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics..
You have the highlight in the wrong place. I have highlighted what W.D.Clinger meant:
No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics.
The highlight is the "classical" physics that Mills is failing at. The predictions of quantum mechanics are the enormous body of empirical evidence that QM explains and matches.
 
Is the Great Randino cashing out?

1) Brilliant Light Power is located ("headquartered") at 493 Old Trenton Rd, Cranbury, NJ (reference: BLP website**). This property is sometimes listed as being in neighboring East Windsor rather than Cranbury.

2) Also headquartered at the same address is "Blacklight Real Estate" with contact Randell Mills which has estimated revenue of $925,288 (reference: Buzzfile, search companies located at 493 Old Trenton Rd, Cranbury, NJ**).

3) While the exact source of that estimated revenue is unknown, Blacklight Real Estate has owned a single property listed in NJ tax records as "493 Edinburg Rd, East Windsor, NJ" since 1998. Despite the different apparent address, this is actually the same property where BLP is located (reference: njparcels website). The estimated value of this property in NJ Tax Records is $5.2M (reference: NJ tax records**, compare below).

4) This suggests that Randy is the owner of the property where Brilliant Light Power is located and pays himself ~$925,000 in rent yearly in addition to whatever salary he is paying himself as Chairman of the Board, President, and CEO Director. This type of arrangement is typically legal but would be a substantial portion of the investment income raised by Brilliant Light Power.

5) The property where Brilliant Light Power is located is currently for sale from owner/user for $5,000,000 (see listing for 493 Old Trenton Rd, East Windsor, NJ on loopnet** which also has some fun photos). This would give Randy a cool $3,000,000 profit over his $2,000,000 1998 purchase price.

Nice gig to make $900,000+ in addition to your salary every year from energy investors. I wonder if they're ok with how their money is being used?

I am also curious though whether selling the property means he is finally cashing out for good and retiring.


** I am a new user, so can't post urls yet.
 
Last edited:
** I am a new user, so can't post urls yet.

http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/493-Old-Trenton-Rd-East-Windsor-NJ/12324020/

(I notice that the rug at the entrance in the 3rd photo still says "Blacklight Power".)

Hopefully BLP will be able to get more investment capital soon. It would be sad if they had to declare bankruptcy and shutdown because they were unable to pay the rent!

At least the investors will be able to walk away with all of those valuable patents!
 
Last edited:
Is the Great Randino cashing out?

1) Brilliant Light Power is located ("headquartered") at 493 Old Trenton Rd, Cranbury, NJ (reference: BLP website**). This property is sometimes listed as being in neighboring East Windsor rather than Cranbury.

2) Also headquartered at the same address is "Blacklight Real Estate" with contact Randell Mills which has estimated revenue of $925,288 (reference: Buzzfile, search companies located at 493 Old Trenton Rd, Cranbury, NJ**).

3) While the exact source of that estimated revenue is unknown, Blacklight Real Estate has owned a single property listed in NJ tax records as "493 Edinburg Rd, East Windsor, NJ" since 1998. Despite the different apparent address, this is actually the same property where BLP is located (reference: njparcels website). The estimated value of this property in NJ Tax Records is $5.2M (reference: NJ tax records**, compare below).

4) This suggests that Randy is the owner of the property where Brilliant Light Power is located and pays himself ~$925,000 in rent yearly in addition to whatever salary he is paying himself as Chairman of the Board, President, and CEO Director. This type of arrangement is typically legal but would be a substantial portion of the investment income raised by Brilliant Light Power.

5) The property where Brilliant Light Power is located is currently for sale from owner/user for $5,000,000 (see listing for 493 Old Trenton Rd, East Windsor, NJ on loopnet** which also has some fun photos). This would give Randy a cool $3,000,000 profit over his $2,000,000 1998 purchase price.

Nice gig to make $900,000+ in addition to your salary every year from energy investors. I wonder if they're ok with how their money is being used?

I am also curious though whether selling the property means he is finally cashing out for good and retiring.


** I am a new user, so can't post urls yet.
Interesting.

Looks like Brilliant Light Power is a subsidiary of Conectiv Solutions, LLC which is a subsidiary of Exelon, a multi billion dollar energy corporation.

Why would Randall Mills be needing investment money from private investors with this kind of backing? This is weird to me.

Anyone care to weigh in?
 
The 18th century isn't far enough back in time. I'm guessing the ancient secret of Hydrino Chemistry was lost around the same time the alchemists quest for Lead into Gold formula was lost to history.

Yeah, YEAH maybe Atlantis was destroyed by their waiting centuries for a guy to produce hydrinos - he never did - or maybe Imhotep used hydrino powered anti-grav to build the pyramids........I mean if markie can make stuff up so can I.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom