Is anyone surprised that Kevin Trudeau...

I would like to apologise for one aspect of my earlier comments.:o

In the past, before the new software was _painfully_ installed, I thought that the screen name of "Iamme" was "Lamme", and I made the comment that there was one too many 'M's in the moniker. I now see (with the new font) that I was mistaken. His name now appears to be "I am me" contracted, and so I take back my remark about the name.:blush:

I remain very distressed by this poster's continued efforts to ignore reality and find any tenuous support for believing this TrueDough arsewipe has any motive other than that of a common criminal. Maybe one day he will learn to tell the difference.

That is all.:)

Dave
 
This is like watching hand fed trout rising for a handful of macaroni.

Iamme- You've had your fun. Enough already, before someone has a heart attack and you have to get the emergency bunny sledge out and race round with the magnetic heart starter and aromatherapy paddles !;)
 
I want to reitterate that Kevin did not imply that any harm arose from being near the microwave oven...but implies that it is in the unique way the food is cooked that somehow alters the chemistry of the food.

What unique way ? You seem to believe just about everything you hear or read. There's a reason why scientists don't claim anything without proof: you can claim anything you want.

The universe was laid like a giant egg by a cosmic-sized, Giant Brown Chicken.

As far as the homeopathic claims go? Bell asked us listeners if we thought there was a more than reasonable possibility that eating all organic could possibly prevent cancer, like Trudeau proclaims. And Bell stated that this is a very reasonable assertion, as it is common knowledge that eating foods with growth hormones, pesticides, etc., can cause cancer.

That's always bugged me. Why do people continue to insist on "organic" foods (a tautology) or "natural" medecine (as if the molecules contained in conventional medecine wasn't "natural" somehow.)

You are aware that foods grown without any form of human intervention are prone to carry other, "organic" and dangerous stuff ?

And it appears that Bell himself believes that Trudeau has been too highly scrutinized and even unfairly censored by making claims that are actually reasonable and most likely true.

In that case he can prove it with evidence.

Now I just heard said that homeopathic medicine has actually helped mainstream medicine. If I could type as fast as people taking short hand, I'd be typing here what they are talking about.

What a convenient cop out.

NOW Kevin just said that he thinks it's wrong that if you don't want your child to get chemotherapy and want to go the homeopathic route...they won't let you.

I think its wrong to give people false hopes in treatments that will most likely kill them for not pursuing conventional, proven solutions.
 
Iamme, I think you will find that Kevin Trudeau will not answer any probing questions about his ideas.

That should tell you a lot about him and his book.

My guess is that he just recommends the stuff he sells. He has another quack commercial where he sells vitamins and stuff.
 
Iamme, I think you will find that Kevin Trudeau will not answer any probing questions about his ideas.

That should tell you a lot about him and his book.

My guess is that he just recommends the stuff he sells. He has another quack commercial where he sells vitamins and stuff.

The media is going to have to take credit for helping Kevin line his pockets even FURTHER. Here is how: Now, Paula Zahn toasted Kevin on some show, just the other day. And just days before THAT, he was toasted on that show I tried to get you all to watch. Kevin was more prepared this time around and got more defensive with Paula, and made a better attempt to keep from verbally stumbling quite so much in this go-around. Again... claims were made that he is just out to make a buck and scam people into paying big bucks for informationless information on his web sirte. But he had an answer foir that, and didn't want to appear as rattled as he was on that show I told you guys about.

I believe that the more this guy is exposed, the MORE money he will make. Not less!
 
I'm not surprised. He's a darn good con artist. He prepares for all the criticism, and he has plenty of reviews to build his rebuffs around. I read the transcript from the Paula interview. His arguments are stupid and baseless, but he has a lot of them.

He'd make a great politician, good at trying to deflect criticism. There's not as much money in it though. He's got a criminal background too.

That's okay. We have Dr. Phil in trouble for his junk now. Phil would do good to learn from Trudeau if he wants to continue peddling baseless crap and making false claims.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/featu....column?coll=chi-health-he&ctrack=1&cset=true

Trudeau and Phil both can escape convictions and lawsuits by sticking to writing books.
 
I believe that the more this guy is exposed, the MORE money he will make. Not less!
Assuming that is true and I suspect it might be then that is part and parcel of living in a society with a free press, free speech and freedom of choice. I wish people were not so stupid that they would fall for this guy's lies but hey, people believe in so many inane things. I would rather have the information get out than not. If people can't reason their way out of a phone booth then maybe they should buy Kevin's book. A fool and his money...
 
Originally Posted by Iamme :
I want to reitterate that Kevin did not imply that any harm arose from being near the microwave oven...but implies that it is in the unique way the food is cooked that somehow alters the chemistry of the food.

Belz:
What unique way ? You seem to believe just about everything you hear or read. There's a reason why scientists don't claim anything without proof: you can claim anything you want.

The universe was laid like a giant egg by a cosmic-sized, Giant Brown Chicken.

Iamme:
That the molecules get scrambled differently and that our bodies must 'know' the difference between heat coil or fire generated heat as opposed to microwaved heat that jumbles the molecules abnormally. That's what I have gathered, anyway.

Originally Posted by Iamme :
As far as the homeopathic claims go? Bell asked us listeners if we thought there was a more than reasonable possibility that eating all organic could possibly prevent cancer, like Trudeau proclaims. And Bell stated that this is a very reasonable assertion, as it is common knowledge that eating foods with growth hormones, pesticides, etc., can cause cancer.

Belz:
That's always bugged me. Why do people continue to insist on "organic" foods (a tautology) or "natural" medecine (as if the molecules contained in conventional medecine wasn't "natural" somehow.)

You are aware that foods grown without any form of human intervention are prone to carry other, "organic" and dangerous stuff ?

Iamme:
Because there is the assertion that we don't know EVERY single thing that our bodies utilize that is in food...nor, the possible complex interactions between those things. For example, zinc is needed to work with (I forgot). Or, how Vitamin D is needed to metabolize calcium. Or, how enzymes are needed to.....Etc..

Unless we are so smart that we can lay out every ingredient on the table and produce a perfect replica of a particular food...there is no way that we understand EVERYTHING about a food, and can't possibly know how EVERY interaction of all the ingredients work.

For example...how do you NOT know that this one glucotriastrophine (I made that word up) is what offsets the colestrol in a certain food? See what I mean? And it might be the only way you can get gluc(blah, blah, blah) into your blood is by eating the whole grain..the whole skin... the whole....you get my drift.

In your second paragraph that I am now responding to: Just what are you getting at? That if something is truly organic it comes with risk, where things NOT organic don't contain the BAD stufff about the organic and therefore there is no risk? Like diseases from catching bad molds or something? You'll maybe have to explain more to me what you mean exactly.

Originally Posted by Iamme :
And it appears that Bell himself believes that Trudeau has been too highly scrutinized and even unfairly censored by making claims that are actually reasonable and most likely true.

Belz:
In that case he can prove it with evidence.

Iamme:
Wellll...I think that if YOU read what some of what Kevin says in his book..it is now common knowledge amongst circles of homeopathic and organic food eaters, that what he says is not even hardly disputable. For example, it is pretty widely accepted that eating lots of nitrates and nitrites and polyunsaturated fats are bad for you. So, he is claiming things that have already been claimed and documented, with evidence, by others. SOME of what Kevin says, I do agree with you, in what you say. *I* have problems with taking as gospel, his cures for many of the major diseases he lists, by taking the stuff he says, and doing what he says, like colon cleansing and other such stuff that many centarians never have even done.


Originally Posted by Iamme :
Now I just heard said that homeopathic medicine has actually helped mainstream medicine. If I could type as fast as people taking short hand, I'd be typing here what they are talking about.

Belz:
What a convenient cop out.

Iamme: WHo is copping out? Me, or Bell? If me, *I* am not copping out at all. IF I truly could have gathered in everything he was saying, I would have been more than happy to put it up here for you guys to argue with me about. :)


Originally Posted by Iamme :
NOW Kevin just said that he thinks it's wrong that if you don't want your child to get chemotherapy and want to go the homeopathic route...they won't let you.

Belz:
I think its wrong to give people false hopes in treatments that will most likely kill them for not pursuing conventional, proven solutions.

Iamme:
I sort of cringed when I heard him say that. It smacks of 7th Day Adventists, where THEY have pulled that, over needed blood transfusions and other stuff
and then their child ends up dying.
 
Originally Posted by Iamme :
I believe that the more this guy is exposed, the MORE money he will make. Not less!

RandFan:
Assuming that is true and I suspect it might be then that is part and parcel of living in a society with a free press, free speech and freedom of choice. I wish people were not so stupid that they would fall for this guy's lies but hey, people believe in so many inane things. I would rather have the information get out than not. If people can't reason their way out of a phone booth then maybe they should buy Kevin's book. A fool and his money...

Iamme:
What you said makes sense, and I agree.

I am carrying that book around with me in my car, and haven't read anymore of it since I did that cover-to-cover skimming of it, so that I could quote things out of the book here. One of these days, I will go through the book more and post MORE stuff about it here. I have been working too much lately, trying to get financially caught up from securing 3 different vehicles at once, and tending to rental properties stuff that has come up. The days haven't been long enough for me, lately.
 
I'm not surprised. He's a darn good con artist. He prepares for all the criticism, and he has plenty of reviews to build his rebuffs around. I read the transcript from the Paula interview. His arguments are stupid and baseless, but he has a lot of them.

He'd make a great politician, good at trying to deflect criticism. There's not as much money in it though. He's got a criminal background too.

That's okay. We have Dr. Phil in trouble for his junk now. Phil would do good to learn from Trudeau if he wants to continue peddling baseless crap and making false claims.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/featu....column?coll=chi-health-he&ctrack=1&cset=true

Trudeau and Phil both can escape convictions and lawsuits by sticking to writing books.

Well, as long as we can put our trust in SOMEone out there that comes across as being in the 'know'..such as...that doctor who often is on PBS who looks like Santa Claus. And for the checks and balances in politics, we can always turn to Bill Maher...or Jon Stewart. :)

About Dr. Phil. I think it made the tabloids already. I remember thinking to myself, 'Ya. Right!" You mean it's true? That he really is under fire?
 
About Dr. Phil. I think it made the tabloids already. I remember thinking to myself, 'Ya. Right!" You mean it's true? That he really is under fire?

Read the article :)
Now the man whose macho shtick is dispensing "Get Real" advice is facing a possible class-action lawsuit filed by three disgruntled dieters. Their main charge is that-- surprise!--the products he endorsed are useless.

Dietary supplements are a confusing, unregulated mess for consumers, and Dr. Phil, seen as a trustworthy figure, isn't helping. Though Dr. Phil and CSA Nutraceuticals haven't commented on the lawsuit, his attorney has said his endorsement fee was donated to the Dr. Phil Foundation, which works primarily to help fight obesity in children. But if Dr. Phil is serious about solving the problem, he should use his fame and his "can-do" spirit to take a stand against worthless weight-loss products rather than promoting them.

I'm just happy to hear it. 20+ pills a day... Man, I'd think that would cause weight gain!
 
Originally Posted by Iamme :
About Dr. Phil. I think it made the tabloids already. I remember thinking to myself, 'Ya. Right!" You mean it's true? That he really is under fire?

Eos of the Eons:
Read the article
Now the man whose macho shtick is dispensing "Get Real" advice is facing a possible class-action lawsuit filed by three disgruntled dieters. Their main charge is that-- surprise!--the products he endorsed are useless.

Dietary supplements are a confusing, unregulated mess for consumers, and Dr. Phil, seen as a trustworthy figure, isn't helping. Though Dr. Phil and CSA Nutraceuticals haven't commented on the lawsuit, his attorney has said his endorsement fee was donated to the Dr. Phil Foundation, which works primarily to help fight obesity in children. But if Dr. Phil is serious about solving the problem, he should use his fame and his "can-do" spirit to take a stand against worthless weight-loss products rather than promoting them.



I'm just happy to hear it. 20+ pills a day... Man, I'd think that would cause weight gain!

Iamme:
Thanx for the snippet because I went to the site you posted and it said about registering/logging in, to get into that Chicago Tribune site.

So Dr. Phil has probably joined every celebrity out there for 'endorsing' some product that perhaps don't work? But with many other endorsing celebrities...take Paul Harvey on his radio show...I have a hunch he hasn't a clue as to the validity of half the stuff he endorses. Then there are those mechanics who endorse the fuel saving Tornado on their radio and tv shows, while the government proclaims that there is no such thing as fuel saving gadgets out there. Bill O'Reilly endorses. I don't trust the whole lot of them! I think that the fact that when these people endorse, their ENTIRE credibilty suffers.
 
Belz:
What unique way ? You seem to believe just about everything you hear or read. There's a reason why scientists don't claim anything without proof: you can claim anything you want.

The universe was laid like a giant egg by a cosmic-sized, Giant Brown Chicken.

Iamme:
That the molecules get scrambled differently and that our bodies must 'know' the difference between heat coil or fire generated heat as opposed to microwaved heat that jumbles the molecules abnormally. That's what I have gathered, anyway.

Ah! there are different "kinds" of heat, yeah ? That's an interesting one. I assume you see what goes on as something similar to this:

Cell 1: Hum! That was a good steak wasn't it ?
Cell 2: Yeah. Didn't you think it tasted funny ?
Cell 1: Funny ? How ?
Cell 2: I don't know. Like...
Cell 1: Spit it out, man!
Cell 2: MICROWAVED!
Cell 1: Woah! You know what THAT means !!!
All together: LET'S GET SICK!

Because there is the assertion that we don't know EVERY single thing that our bodies utilize that is in food...nor, the possible complex interactions between those things. For example, zinc is needed to work with (I forgot). Or, how Vitamin D is needed to metabolize calcium. Or, how enzymes are needed to.....Etc..

You didn't understand anything, did you ? What's the difference between "organic" food and "... non-organic ?" food ? Besides the various insect eggs in the untreated ones, that is.

Unless we are so smart that we can lay out every ingredient on the table and produce a perfect replica of a particular food...there is no way that we understand EVERYTHING about a food, and can't possibly know how EVERY interaction of all the ingredients work.

Argument from ignorance. I get that a lot, recently.

In your second paragraph that I am now responding to: Just what are you getting at? That if something is truly organic it comes with risk, where things NOT organic don't contain the BAD stufff about the organic and therefore there is no risk? Like diseases from catching bad molds or something? You'll maybe have to explain more to me what you mean exactly.

I'm saying that untreated foods have their drawbacks as well.
 
I wonder if anyone else has noticed that book is "blaming the victim". You're sick? It's your lifestyle, dummy! If you only lived better (by my Quick and Easy Plan! You can purchase it for 50 easy payments of 29.95!) you would be healthy.

Of course, chronically ill people who attempt to buy themselves into this plan out of desperation end up making themselves sicker when they do not get better by these plans.

I don't know about you, but I'll stick with Western Medicine. At least I can FIND verifiable double-blind studies that prove that it works.
 
I wonder if anyone else has noticed that book is "blaming the victim". You're sick? It's your lifestyle, dummy! If you only lived better (by my Quick and Easy Plan! You can purchase it for 50 easy payments of 29.95!) you would be healthy.

Of course, chronically ill people who attempt to buy themselves into this plan out of desperation end up making themselves sicker when they do not get better by these plans.

I don't know about you, but I'll stick with Western Medicine. At least I can FIND verifiable double-blind studies that prove that it works.

Ah! A new blood!

Welcome to Hell! Er... I mean, welcome to the forums, though on some threads it may seem like Hell!
 
I would like to apologise for one aspect of my earlier comments.:o

In the past, before the new software was _painfully_ installed, I thought that the screen name of "Iamme" was "Lamme", and I made the comment that there was one too many 'M's in the moniker. I now see (with the new font) that I was mistaken. His name now appears to be "I am me" contracted, and so I take back my remark about the name.:blush:

I remain very distressed by this poster's continued efforts to ignore reality and find any tenuous support for believing this TrueDough arsewipe has any motive other than that of a common criminal. Maybe one day he will learn to tell the difference.

That is all.:)

Dave

So YOU are the onew that's been calling me "Lame", ehhhh? LOL. All is forgiven. :)

TrueDough? Ha. I like that. I am sure it's true he is out after money. But at the same time, the guy speaks with the enthusiasm of a Joe Newman who believed he actualy was the first one to invent an energy machine that could put more power back into the batteries than what was being used up as 'work'. Kevin is another such a guy I think. I believe he could be somewhat misguided more than being just a criminal. Possibly.
 
Before I begin: A coincidence. On tv right now they are talking about microwave ovens!

..................................

Originally Posted by Iamme :
Belz:
What unique way ? You seem to believe just about everything you hear or read. There's a reason why scientists don't claim anything without proof: you can claim anything you want.

The universe was laid like a giant egg by a cosmic-sized, Giant Brown Chicken.

Iamme:
That the molecules get scrambled differently and that our bodies must 'know' the difference between heat coil or fire generated heat as opposed to microwaved heat that jumbles the molecules abnormally. That's what I have gathered, anyway.

Belz:
Ah! there are different "kinds" of heat, yeah ? That's an interesting one. I assume you see what goes on as something similar to this:

Cell 1: Hum! That was a good steak wasn't it ?
Cell 2: Yeah. Didn't you think it tasted funny ?
Cell 1: Funny ? How ?
Cell 2: I don't know. Like...
Cell 1: Spit it out, man!
Cell 2: MICROWAVED!
Cell 1: Woah! You know what THAT means !!!
All together: LET'S GET SICK!

Iamme:
I guess this is going to call for a Google search into if microwaves somehow scramble around food molecules differently than other forms of heat, to settle this once and for all.


Originally Posted by Iamme :
Because there is the assertion that we don't know EVERY single thing that our bodies utilize that is in food...nor, the possible complex interactions between those things. For example, zinc is needed to work with (I forgot). Or, how Vitamin D is needed to metabolize calcium. Or, how enzymes are needed to.....Etc..

Belz:
You didn't understand anything, did you ? What's the difference between "organic" food and "... non-organic ?" food ? Besides the various insect eggs in the untreated ones, that is.

Iamme:
I see what you are saying now. Well, organic doesn't have pesticides, or growth hormones added.


Originally Posted by Iamme :
Unless we are so smart that we can lay out every ingredient on the table and produce a perfect replica of a particular food...there is no way that we understand EVERYTHING about a food, and can't possibly know how EVERY interaction of all the ingredients work.

Belz:
Argument from ignorance. I get that a lot, recently.

Iamme:
Why is what I said, ignorant? Are you saying then that scientists know every single component about a food. And every single possible interaction? EVERYthing?


Originally Posted by Iamme :
In your second paragraph that I am now responding to: Just what are you getting at? That if something is truly organic it comes with risk, where things NOT organic don't contain the BAD stufff about the organic and therefore there is no risk? Like diseases from catching bad molds or something? You'll maybe have to explain more to me what you mean exactly.

Belz:
I'm saying that untreated foods have their drawbacks as well.

Iamme:
You named insect eggs. I suppose we could get into why they want to irradiate all foods. How some stuff is pasteurized and homoginized. But then, Kevin has acknowledged these processes and believes such stuff can cause cancer and other problems.

And as far as my current knowledge is on this, it does seem that everything we do that is not natural indeed causes cancer or other health issues. Or, if the process is relatively tame, let's say in the fact that the product is heat treated...that nutrients wil be lost. Sure, the idea is that less people will contract some disease. But at the same time, by not eating organic, because we are too lazy to grow our own food, we set ourselves up for these health problems by buying all this food that only has only half the food value of ripe, organic foods that comes from some local source.

My grandma used to grow fresh stuff in her garden, then can it to carry it through the winter till the next growing season. But this once common practice is not too common anymore and we have become more of the ready-to-eat, fast food society...and are most likely paying for this fact. I can't see how this is even disputable, quite frankly.
 
we set ourselves up for these health problems by buying all this food that only has only half the food value of ripe, organic foods that comes from some local source.

That is completely misquided and untrue. Organic food can be prone to being less nutritious because it is is open to disease and parasitism. NOt only that, but untested and unregulated "organic pesticides" can be used on them. You don't know what you're ingesting.

We had a whole thread on this very topic. Sorry you missed it. I'll try to dig it up.

It seems to have dissappeared. I'll dig up some links instead:

http://www.ofrf.org/press/Press Clippings/AR.Democrat.Gazette.052703.pdf

FAYETTEVILLE University of Arkansas Professor Curt Rom sprayed a federally approved organic pesticide on apple trees
last month, hoping to kill bugs.
He didn't get the desired result. Instead, the pesticide burned the fruit, Rom said.

His nonorganic tree orchards don't have as many weeds and few trees are as diseased or dead.

"That's part of our learning curve," Rom said. "We sprayed
something that is safe to spray, and we're getting a terrible reaction. We have to sort that out."

Safe to spray? Then why did it burn the fruit??

Banned pesticide found in organic food:

The consignment of 83 tonnes of chicken meat was rejected and the supplier, Gruene Wiese, a large organic farming operation, was left with the task of tracking the source of contamination.

The wheat was supplied by GS agri, a major distributor of both conventional and organic grain.

However, the discovery of nitrofen contamination in organic wheat and chicken has dealt a blow to the safe image of organic food.
http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/pn57/pn57p20a.htm

So have a safely irradiated fungus free apple, or one that has some whacky "organic pesticide"

More on irradiation:

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/foodirradiation.htm#whatis
 
Last edited:
I guess this is going to call for a Google search into if microwaves somehow scramble around food molecules differently than other forms of heat, to settle this once and for all.

Give us a call when it'd done, no matter what you find. Or not.

Why is what I said, ignorant? Are you saying then that scientists know every single component about a food. And every single possible interaction? EVERYthing?

You DO know what the argument from ignorance is, don't you ? It's arguing that, because we don't know, your claim is likely to be correct. It's a fallacy.

You named insect eggs. I suppose we could get into why they want to irradiate all foods. How some stuff is pasteurized and homoginized. But then, Kevin has acknowledged these processes and believes such stuff can cause cancer and other problems.

I don't care what he believe in. He must provide evidence to support his claims. Otherwise he's talking out of his ass.

And as far as my current knowledge is on this, it does seem that everything we do that is not natural indeed causes cancer or other health issues.

Eating red meat is not natural ? How so ?

Or, if the process is relatively tame, let's say in the fact that the product is heat treated...that nutrients wil be lost. Sure, the idea is that less people will contract some disease. But at the same time, by not eating organic, because we are too lazy to grow our own food, we set ourselves up for these health problems by buying all this food that only has only half the food value of ripe, organic foods that comes from some local source.

That's all assuming that your precious Kevin is telling the truth. Again, we're still waiting on that.

My grandma used to grow fresh stuff in her garden, then can it to carry it through the winter till the next growing season. But this once common practice is not too common anymore and we have become more of the ready-to-eat, fast food society...and are most likely paying for this fact. I can't see how this is even disputable, quite frankly.

Most likely ? Not with the evidence (or lack thereof) you've presented.
 

Back
Top Bottom