The Trump Presidency VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's all I get from Logger's posts. Everything is about sides with ZERO interest in the details. Trump is good because? I'm still not clear. Other than he's conservative, and sticking it to the liberals. He says we're uninformed about Trump's policies but he NEVER EVER goes into any detail about what those policies are and how they will accomplish anything.

Trump good, Liberal bad. That's about as much depth as I get.

Edited by Agatha: 
Please do not discuss your ignore list in-thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has called off a visit by the Philadelphia Eagles to the White House Tuesday due to the dispute over whether NFL players must stand during the playing of the national anthem.

Trump says in a statement that some members of the Super Bowl championship team “disagree with their President because he insists that they proudly stand for the National Anthem, hand on heart.”

Trump says the team wanted to send a smaller delegation, but fans who planned to attend “deserve better.”

He says he’ll instead be hosting “a different type of ceremony” with the U.S. Marine Band.
 
Edited by Agatha: 
Please do not discuss your ignore list in-thread.

I really want honest discussion. But that custom seems to be dying. I may not always agree with the other person, but at least I can grasp their perspective. But with so many people today, it's turned into a zero sum game. I win, you lose. And what bothers me the most is the lack of introspection. Few people it seems are willing to challenge their own positions.

The lack of detail in this poster's comments demonstrates a total unwillingness to apply skepticism and critical thought. If one cannot defend one's position thoughtfully, how can they possibly believe they got it right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has called off a visit by the Philadelphia Eagles to the White House Tuesday due to the dispute over whether NFL players must stand during the playing of the national anthem.

Trump says in a statement that some members of the Super Bowl championship team “disagree with their President because he insists that they proudly stand for the National Anthem, hand on heart.”

Trump says the team wanted to send a smaller delegation, but fans who planned to attend “deserve better.”

He says he’ll instead be hosting “a different type of ceremony” with the U.S. Marine Band.

Philly Eagles or Marine band. Seem interchangeable to me.
 
I really want honest discussion. But that custom seems to be dying. I may not always agree with the other person, but at least I can grasp their perspective. But with so many people today, it's turned into a zero sum game. I win, you lose. And what bothers me the most is the lack of introspection. Few people it seems are willing to challenge their own positions.

The lack of detail in this poster's comments demonstrates a total unwillingness to apply skepticism and critical thought. If one cannot defend one's position thoughtfully, how can they possibly believe they got it right?

It’s clear you don’t want discussion, look where you’re questions start.

You can’t give the president credit for anything, how is that an honest discussion?
 
It’s that true of Republicans in general thee days? Democrats use the facts to determine what side they are on, Republicans use what side they are on to determine the “facts”

Democrats in this country run on pure emotion, that is what liberalism is made up with, pure emotion, there’s no logic in it whatsoever. I will admit here at least the liberals try to put logic and critical thinking into their positions, but the national democrat party and its supporters and liberalism are pure emotion.
 
It’s clear you don’t want discussion, look where you’re questions start.

You can’t give the president credit for anything, how is that an honest discussion?

Nonsense.

What should I give him credit for? Please elucidate.
 
Democrats in this country run on pure emotion, that is what liberalism is made up with, pure emotion, there’s no logic in it whatsoever. I will admit here at least the liberals try to put logic and critical thinking into their positions, but the national democrat party and its supporters and liberalism are pure emotion.

How about being specific. What emotion? What lack of logic? These generalizations get tiresome.
 
Trump is NOT an habitual liar? Seriously? You think this is simply just an insult and not an empirical fact?

You don't think he cheated the Students of Trump University? How about his first wife? How about his second wife? How about Melanie? How about his bond holders and investors? How about vendors he refused to pay and demanded steep discounts after they provided their goods and services?

You think he has been trustworthy? Seriously?

Trump is NOT a sleaze? You think cheating on your spouse with a porn star days after she gave birth to his son is upstanding? You think men should rape their wives? You think men should hang out in women's changing rooms is ok? You think all us men should just 'grab them by the pussy'?

Hmmm
Thanks again for proving my point. Much of this just plain ol rumor. If Trump was guilty of anything you would lay all these on him also. It’s just foolishness. It’s why you’ll never be able to have a serious discussion about him or more importantly his policies. Your side isn’t welcome to the discussion table because your side cannot have a constructive discussion with real ideas.

So we will continue to kick the left from one side of the country to the other. We will use the laws, the electoral college, redistricting, all the tools we can to defeat the left.
 
Just to pick one out here: Trump's not a cheat? Um, how many wives has he cheated on? All of them? How much did he settle the Trump U case for? $25 million, I believe?

You really do live up to the reputation you have around here.

Interesting that your hung up on infidelity, he probably learned it from a democrat, hell he was a democrat.

Settling a lawsuit for 25 million isn’t exactly cheating? ;)
 
There seems to be a massive amount of denial with Trump supporters. If they recognize any of his flaws, they rationalize them and jump to a ridiculous shouts of what about and false equivalences.

We know what his flaws are, we just aren’t triggered by them.
 
How about being specific. What emotion? What lack of logic? These generalizations get tiresome.

Big government
Division of the races
Everything the left proposes starts with trying to make the republicans into Satan.

You can’t even have a reasonable discussion about Trump without going through a tirade first.

He’s literally been shoved down the democrat throat!
 
We know what his flaws are, we just aren’t triggered by them.

Do you?

You just denied that Trump lies habitually. Now, perhaps he just unknowingly makes plainly false statements because he is ignorant of the truth, but you surely can't deny that Trump repeatedly and habitually says false things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom