Ed Breaking: Mueller Grand Jury charges filed, arrests as soon as Monday

Status
Not open for further replies.

What you're saying is that to help in his investigation of Trump, Mueller has started working with someone who has already been investigating Trump? The evidence that this is a bad thing is a) he accurately called the Muslim ban a Muslim ban, b) he justifiably sued Trump for his fraud in the Trump University debacle, and c) has investigated Trump's charities, presumably over things like the self-dealing that the Trump Organisation admitted to?

It says something when the worst thing that can be said about someone is that they've not accepted the unethical and criminal behaviour of the person you're trying to venerate.
 
Nobody ever takes into account all of the factors. And even if they did, the personal cost doesn't necessarily outweigh them.

If a policy is "net beneficial" to the entire species... but requires you to sacrifice the life of your child for "the greater good", do you genuinely think you'd be just fine with that policy, because it's for the greater good?

Are you still claiming that removing CFCs as a propellant from asthma inhalers caused the price to triple?
 
What you're saying is that to help in his investigation of Trump, Mueller has started working with someone who has already been investigating Trump? The evidence that this is a bad thing is a) he accurately called the Muslim ban a Muslim ban, b) he justifiably sued Trump for his fraud in the Trump University debacle, and c) has investigated Trump's charities, presumably over things like the self-dealing that the Trump Organisation admitted to?

It says something when the worst thing that can be said about someone is that they've not accepted the unethical and criminal behaviour of the person you're trying to venerate.
No, that obviously looks like you saying it.
 
I was trying to parse the actual words and I had a hard time finding an argument for that.

Though obviously Clinton's civil case was allowed by the courts.

Article I section 3

So once impeached POTUS can be indicted. Nixon did have to be pardoned in order not to got to trial for obstruction of justice.


I just don't see Mueller challenging that with an indictment first.

But I agree, probably not settled law whether the indictment can be done before impeachment.

The constitution is vague on exactly what happens when a prosecutor indicts a president and the president is not impeached. This is a constitutional crisis that has no case or statute law. And the constitution does not directly address it.
 
Are you still claiming that removing CFCs as a propellant from asthma inhalers caused the price to triple?

Of course the only alternative is that one would have to think that pharmaceutical companies are price gouging consumers when they can! If epipens show anything it is that clearly that can never happen.
 
No, that obviously looks like you saying it.

Mueller isn't investigating Trump? Or Schneiderman hasn't investigated Trump? Or Mueller isn't working with Schneiderman? Because that's what I said. And I was using the article you posted as the source of that information. Is the article you posted wrong?
 
Mueller postponing the Russian Troll farm he wants to prosecute. Lol
The prosecution team sought the delay on the grounds that it’s unclear whether Concord Management formally accepted the court summons related to the case. Mueller’s prosecutors also revealed that they tried to deliver the summonses for Concord and IRA through the Russian government, without success.

Mueller wants a delay because the Russians weren’t properly served. Lol ******* hilarious!

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627
 
They believed Clinton was into pay to play with the Clinton Foundation (accusations never supported when investigated) and they figured, hey, we can do that. Or, they planned to do it all along. The reason they were convinced Clinton was doing it was because they simply believe every POTUS does it.

It looks like Trump,Inc did it without a "foundation" but I bet if you look at the inaugural committee and Trump's 2020 campaign funds you'll find even more millions of pay to play laundered through those entities.


So, big question. Is withdrawing from the Iran deal a convenient wag the dog distraction because they knew the Avenatti reveal was coming today?
 
Last edited:
Remember how they were talking about written responses?

Maybe his lawyers can gag him and make him write down his responses whenever Mueller asks him something.

That would definitely solve any loquaciousness issues.

Or you're gonna need a bigger crayon.

A yuge crayon.
 
Remember how they were talking about written responses?

Maybe his lawyers can gag him and make him write down his responses whenever Mueller asks him something.

That would definitely solve any loquaciousness issues.
People are saying the Trump team are pushing for multiple choice

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom