• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: All things Trump + Russia Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
logger said:
the liberal media has a history of these recycled fake stories.
Click to expand...

A fine example of a conditioned response if ever there was one.

If your view of "Liberal Media" includes the New York Times and the Washington Post, then they both just won a Pulitzer Prize for their Russia reporting.

Pulitzer Prize said:
National Reporting: Jointly awarded to the staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post.
"For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation's understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 election and its connections to the Trump campaign. The president-elect's transition team and his eventual administration."
Click to expand...
 
Trebuchet said:
They don't even need to actually have a pee tape. They just need Trump to think they might.
Click to expand...

Or it could be something else entirely. Like laundering Russian money.

Trump's behavior toward Russia is far far outside his character. Trump attacks. He does that against everyone. He doesn't turn the other cheek. And Trump has no self control.
So why does he defend Putin and Russia at every turn? Russia has been a huge adversary of the US for a long time. It's not like the rednecks voted for Trump because of Russia.

Also, what better way to prove that there is nothing to the Russia story?

It just makes zero sense that Trump would stop the sanctions against Russia unless....
 
varwoche said:
If that's true, then the attorney for the Very Stable Genius committed perjury, and for no purpose.

No, this time it's a virtual certainty that Hannity is telling tall tales.
Click to expand...

If he was giving advice to Hannity, he would still have to disclose. I’m not sure why this even matters. No one wants their name brought into something they aren’t apart of.
 
logger said:
If he was giving advice to Hannity, he would still have to disclose. I’m not sure why this even matters. No one wants their name brought into something they aren’t apart of.
Click to expand...

He's listed Hannity as a client so he's already done that. Hannity seems to be trying to have it both ways. He wants to deny that he is a client but still be entitled to attorney client privilege. I don't buy that argument, but he still may dodge the bullet since his relationship with Cohen may not fall within the scope of the search warrant. But if Cohen actually worked for Hannity, it cost Hannity a hell of a lot more than $10.
 
logger said:
If he was giving advice to Hannity, he would still have to disclose. I’m not sure why this even matters. No one wants their name brought into something they aren’t apart of.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter, except to show what a lying "journalist" Hannity is. As if we need another reminder of that.
 
No evidence, of course, but my Spidey sense is tingling. I've got this niggling feeling that Hannity employed Cohen in his fixer role. Hannity's stressing of "no third party" involvement in his dealings with Cohen strikes me of the ol' methinks he doth protest too much.
 
Lurch said:
No evidence, of course, but my Spidey sense is tingling. I've got this niggling feeling that Hannity employed Cohen in his fixer role. Hannity's stressing of "no third party" involvement in his dealings with Cohen strikes me of the ol' methinks he doth protest too much.
Click to expand...

Officer: Please show me your license and registration.

Hannity: There is no body in the trunk!!!
 
Well, yes, if you want advice about a real estate matter you go to a lawyer specialising in real estate, if you want something covered up you go to someone like Cohen.
I'm sure that there will be people digging away to find out what that might be.
More popcorn please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom