Stormy Daniels Sues the President

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Stormy Daniels situation may be causing additional friction in the Trump administration:

From: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/08/politics/trump-sarah-sanders-stormy-daniels/index.html
President Donald Trump is upset with White House press secretary Sarah Sanders over her responses Wednesday regarding his alleged affair with porn star Stormy Daniels, a source close to the White House tells CNN...On Wednesday, Sanders told reporters that the arbitration was won "in the President's favor." The statement is an admission that the nondisclosure agreement exists, and that it directly involves the President.

This reminds me of the Hope Hicks situation: Trump Loyalist, does something that annoys Cheeto Mussolini, and gets criticized for it. In Hick's case, it may have had a part in making her leave the white house.

Well in Hicks situation it might have been felony witness tampering.
 
By the way ...

Has anyone else noticed the irony where a year or two ago Trump was threatening to sue the women who accused him of sexual harassment, but he did not institute such law suits.

And now, we have a case that does involve sex, but does not involve sexual harassment, and as a result it is Donald Trump who is the one who is getting sued.

Weird.
 
President Dennison’s dirtbag lawyer obtained a “restraining order” from a private company, written by a retired judge. It has much legal standing as a restraining order written in crayon by my six-year-old forbidding us from serving her broccoli at dinner.

Golly, crayon orders are enforciable under the Federal Arbitration Act?

I'll be goldarned
 
And the GOP shows it unbridled hypocrisy by keeping quite about this, whereas they were all over Clinton on it.
 
And the Democrat shows it unbridled hypocrisy by being outraged about this, whereas they were keeping quite over Clinton on it.
 
And the GOP shows it unbridled hypocrisy by keeping quite about this, whereas they were all over Clinton on it.

And the Democrat shows it unbridled hypocrisy by being outraged about this, whereas they were keeping quite over Clinton on it.

Either of you is welcome to show your work. Especially congressmen who are still in office since Clinton.

Otherwise ...meh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom