Proof of Immortality, VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thermal,
- No.
- I've been trying to respond to their questions for 6 years. I suspect that I've actually responded to all of them at one time or another -- my opponents (100 or so) just don't accept my answers. It probably is time for me to move on, and see if I can find any statisticians that actually agree with me...

Odd, just in the last few days there are several questions you've avoided, despite having had it brought to your attention.

Also, I'm quite sure Thermal is well aware of what happened when last you took this to some statisticians.
 
Thermal may not be aware that another dishonest tactic employed by Jabba is to stop responding after he's been backed into a corner, but to continue to check back on the thread. There will then be yet another reset when Jabba deems that sufficient time has passed.
 
- I'm currently editing my syllogism. When I finish, I'll submit it to a statistics forum. I'll let you know what forum that is.
 
- I'm currently editing my syllogism. When I finish, I'll submit it to a statistics forum. I'll let you know what forum that is.

You already submitted it to a statistical forum. They eviscerated it for the same reasons we did. That's because those are real reasons, whether you understand them or not. You didn't care; you just ignored them. They incidentally drew the same conclusions as we regarding your presentation mode: you really just want to hear yourself talk. You really don't care what others think.

You may realize that since you've admitted your inability to answer our questions and proposed to go elsewhere, your critics here have every right to claim victory.
 
- I'm currently editing my syllogism. When I finish, I'll submit it to a statistics forum. I'll let you know what forum that is.

Literally nobody cares. It will be the exact same nonsense as before. I have literally never interact with a human being; real life, internet persona, troll, you name it, that has been this incapable of any level of intellectual growth or change.

I've dealt with some of the wrongest of wrong not even wrong fractually wrong wronger than wrong people before and all of them at least modify what kind of wrong they are after a while.

Arguing with Woo Slingers is often like watching paint dry. This whole nightmare has been like watching paint. We didn't even get to watch it dry, at least that would have been something.
 
- I'm currently editing my syllogism. When I finish, I'll submit it to a statistics forum. I'll let you know what forum that is.

Be sure to let them know which forum you had you ass handed to you and turned tail and ran from.

You wouldn't be ashamed of your behavior here, would you?
 
Yes, everyone who has explained Bayes, the Texas sharpshooter fallacy and all the other things Jabba clearly won't ever be able to understand to him multiple times is insane.

Touche. We should just link back to Jay's detailed, succinct critique
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom