Michael Flynn charged

[WilliamSeger]

It's you who doesn't understand. What I described is what Flynn pleaded guilty to having lied about, it's what the Mueller investigation says was discussed.

You people should really learn to read primary sources instead of letting those talking heads poison your brains. Would spare you some embarrassments.

LOL, another thing that sensible people will not believe is that that's all there is to the story. For one thing, this particular conversation was months after the Russian dirty work was done and the Trump campaign was well aware that Russia had hacked the DNC and Podesta emails and wanted to help Trump win, so any quid pro quo agreement would have already been in place.

Here's where we've been, so far, with their version of the story:

We had nothing to do with Russia.

Okay, some people talked to Russians and lied about it, but we didn't talk about the sanctions or Hillary's emails so there was no collusion.

Okay, some people talked to Russians about sanctions and Hillary's emails and lied about it, but there was no collusion.


With new evidence about TrumpCo lies coming out virtually every week, there is no reason to think we're at the end, and in fact, with Flynn copping a plea, there is every reason to think we're only on about Chapter 4.

 

[logger]

LOL, another thing that sensible people will not believe is that that's all there is to the story. For one thing, this particular conversation was months after the Russian dirty work was done and the Trump campaign was well aware that Russia had hacked the DNC and Podesta emails and wanted to help Trump win, so any quid pro quo agreement would have already been in place.

Here's where we've been, so far, with their version of the story:

We had nothing to do with Russia.

Okay, some people talked to Russians and lied about it, but we didn't talk about the sanctions or Hillary's emails so there was no collusion.

Okay, some people talked to Russians about sanctions and Hillary's emails and lied about it, but there was no collusion.


With new evidence about TrumpCo lies coming out virtually every week, there is no reason to think we're at the end, and in fact, with Flynn copping a plea, there is every reason to think we're only on about Chapter 4.

Lol

New evidence?

What Flynn was charged with has been known for months.

 

[logger]

... says a poster who a few minutes earlier foisted opinion from Judicial Watch <guffaw> rather than identify whatever facts in the source documents are of import.

Ah, Judicial Watch has been responsible for getting government hidden information OUT on a host of issues. Naturally the left would would have spasms over that.

 

[logger]

You don't seem to understand: Nothing that these people say about what was discussed, after first lying about anything being discussed, is credible.

Lol

Are you now agreeing with Dershowitz?

 

[logger]

Really? The (now ex) national security advisor to the POTUS lied to the FBI about his conversations with the official representative of a foreign power and that is a minor matter?

Ah, with respect to Russian collusion? Yes!

 

[NoahFence]

Lol

New evidence?

What Flynn was charged with has been known for months.

We also know what he wasn't charged with, and we know why.

 

[varwoche]

Ah, Judicial Watch has been responsible for getting government hidden information OUT on a host of issues. Naturally the left would would have spasms over that.

Getting information out? No problem.
Consuming said information? No problem.
Relying on Judicial Watch's editorializing about said information? Big problem.

 

[logger]

Getting information out? No problem.
Consuming said information? No problem.
Relying on Judicial Watch's editorializing about said information? Big problem.

You can identify the information.

You can consume the information.

But you can’t get past the editorializing. Got it.

 

[kellyb]

I think maybe what Russia got in return for helping Trump was to keep its client state, Syria.

 

[Stacko]

We also know what he wasn't charged with, and we know why.

It's really telling that none of the Turkey stuff, unregistered foreign agent for them while being NSA, the kidnapping plot, the paid for oped, etc., isn't covered in the plea. There's clearly more to come.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

I think maybe what Russia got in return for helping Trump was to keep its client state, Syria.

Definitely on the table, and easier to get away with than dropping sanctions.

 

[NoahFence]

It's really telling that none of the Turkey stuff, unregistered foreign agent for them while being NSA, the kidnapping plot, the paid for oped, etc., isn't covered in the plea. There's clearly more to come.

Yep. They'll take one away for every bit of info they get from the canary

 

[BrooklynBaby]

The way it works is if you tell the feds you had oatmeal for breakfast on a particular date 2 months ago, but told them yesterday you had Cream of Wheat, that is a felony, locked in and on tape. No way out. It is a false statement, and relevance to the investigation is irrelevant.

 

[thaiboxerken]

The way it works is if you tell the feds you had oatmeal for breakfast on a particular date 2 months ago, but told them yesterday you had Cream of Wheat, that is a felony, locked in and on tape. No way out. It is a false statement, and relevance to the investigation is irrelevant.

What you posted here is horse feces. I don't think anyone fell for it. Nice try, though.

Thanks for playing. You can go back to your Fox News forums now.

 

[WilliamSeger]

The way it works is if you tell the feds you had oatmeal for breakfast on a particular date 2 months ago, but told them yesterday you had Cream of Wheat, that is a felony, locked in and on tape. No way out. It is a false statement, and relevance to the investigation is irrelevant.

Baloney, the "way it works" is that a false statement must be about a "material fact" to be a prosecuted as a crime.

 

[kellyb]

The way it works is if you tell the feds you had oatmeal for breakfast on a particular date 2 months ago, but told them yesterday you had Cream of Wheat, that is a felony, locked in and on tape. No way out. It is a false statement, and relevance to the investigation is irrelevant.

Oh, is that why Hillary's in jail over not knowing she accidentally sent a couple of technically classified documents through her private server? LOL

 

[varwoche]

You can identify the information.

You can consume the information.

But you can’t get past the editorializing. Got it.

We're not mind readers. When someone cites JW commentary, as opposed to the source documents, readers are unable to determine if the commentary is reasonable. Critical thinking 101, day one.

 

[thaiboxerken]

And Dump is whining "what about Hillary" when it comes to Flynn.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

The way it works is if you tell the feds you had oatmeal for breakfast on a particular date 2 months ago, but told them yesterday you had Cream of Wheat, that is a felony, locked in and on tape. No way out. It is a false statement, and relevance to the investigation is irrelevant.

In what universe?

 

[Upchurch]

In what universe?

The one in which you desperately want to downplay something that looks like the first of a bunch of dominoes falling.