• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged A God of Love / The Living God

You know full well I was responding to the content of a single post not the entire thread

Meaning there are positive posts in the rest of the thread?

Besides, you making wild pronunciations with no reason for us to believe you is not a positive thing.

I gave the reasons.

The closest you come to being positive is the fact that you are positively amusing in your endless stream of easily debunked and absurd lies.

Well at least there is something for the children to enjoy. The others has some serious investigating to do. And then you get the lazy ones. Doing nothing. Just relying on the others to do it. Something for everybody.
 
Well I posted some there. You never answered. And I also tried to sent you a "friend request" but could not find "Cleaopatra". Why?

Also the page itself say that it is only a joke.



Yep I sent you to a parody page because I find this all one big parody. You spammed the hell out of the page, why on earth would I let you run down a road that leads to mine? Mother Cleo is no fool! And while Mother Cleo is here, much mother love to all the mothers in this room.
 
Last edited:
You could have got a lot of "evidence" from him and others there on his page to find out if he really is "some random guy".

Wrong.

I did ask him about you. He never replied. Clearly, whatever he says to your face, he doesn't think much of you in public.
 
Yep I sent you to a parody page because I find this all one big parody. You spammed the hell out of the page, why on earth would I let you run down a road that leads to mine? Mother Cleo is no fool! And while Mother Cleo is here, much mother love to all the mothers in this room.

Hmmm. I am unsure if self-borks count towards your score.
 
BWAHAHAHAHA. So, you admit that your "son" borked the thing you harassed him into doing,

That is only your opinion. But since you admit he is there you can ask him. At least he is there. So unlike your ghosts.

and then after weeks of being told that it was borked, you finally harassed him into correcting the blunder.

Yep. It was a mistake. Which most said was deceit from my side. Now you said it is a "blunder". But what did you say originally?

Then you accuse US of being sloppy?

You could have investigated. It was there all the time. Just waiting on you. So what do you call evidence sitting there and you not finding it? And everybody knows that it is just something of "log in".

**** off and own your own blunders.

As I said. What did you originally say about it. And why?
 
Hmmm. I am unsure if self-borks count towards your score.

I think they should at least be half-borks.
Having accumulated a fairly decent-sized divinity of about 3 borks for myself so far, which, by any standard, is nothing to sneeze at, I'm not really feeling very different. :confused:

Where is halleyscomet? I want to feel him. I think he's the most divine.
 
Eventually he MIGHT figure out who is causing all his problems.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/tIWHfSQl.jpg[/qimg]

Yep. Good one this. But it seems you do not believe it for yourself. It is only me. You are no problem to yourself says your brain and your books etc.

But I discovered that 30 years ago. And then I found the solution. To die as a human being and be born again as a Godly being.

http://christianforums.net/Fellowship/index.php?threads/born-again.68720/

But most here are still looking for the problem in their life. At least they can see it now. But do they see the solution? Or are they doing what you are doing. Pointing everywhere except at themselves.
 
Now you're just being an asshòle. You literally just posted that Zola has only now changed his settings, and you call Kali sloppy because she didn't have access to the information that's newly become available?

As if we didn't already know what you were about, you reveal yourself to have the pig-spirit you're so fond of accusing everyone else of having.

She could have investigated. She is Cleopatra remember. Having a Facebook page. Easy to link up with others. She did nothing. Just blaming the mistake. Next time she would know to do something more. Not just sit like a baby and crying. Well I do not judge her. I know she is still one. Mine. So I have to pull her to get up and walk.
 
Or are they doing what you are doing. Pointing everywhere except at themselves.

Buddy, you really need to heed your own advice. The security settings of your "friends" page needed to be changed. Everyone here told you that many times. When you finally realized the mistake YOU had been making for pages and pages, you then try to tell us it's our fault that we didn't want to send a friend request to a total stranger, who has connections to a stalker, to see one random picture??
 
Wrong again. I knew it was there because I was looking at it every time. The many posts were only complaints which gave me no clue as to the origin of the problem. Somebody gave me a clue. He knows who he is. He can just step forward and tell you guys what he said vs. the complaints. No reason for looking through everything which just wastes my time.

Several people told you what the problem was. I was among them. We have no way of knowing which one of us you finally listened to. I, however was the one who gave you step-by-step directions for testing the problem so you could verify what we were seeing.

You're welcome.

So tell me. Why am I telling a lie?

Well, since you ASKED me to speculate I think I can do so without incurring the wrath of the moderators.

I can think of several reasons for you to be lying. The most likely one is that, as you have demonstrated repeatedly in this thread, you are incapable of admitting you were wrong. You seem to have a desperate need to lie and twist reality so you come out the hero. The fact an entire town kicked you out suggests this has gotten to the point of being egregiously maladaptive behavior on your part.

You were wrong about the Facebook image's availability. You had the security settings on the image changed. You have been blatantly lying ever since to try and shift the blame for your computer illiteracy to other people. Nobody here is buying it, yet you persist.

But it is true about "gaslighting". I am ligting the gas light to show you the path so that you will not stumble so much in future. Because your good brain and knowledge and books and computers etc. are not helping you now. And then you think your one book will help me. I have already One Book helping me.

That's not what gaslighting is. I provided a link, but you clearly did not click it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting

Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target's belief.[1][2]

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term owes its origin to a 1938 play Gas Light and its 1944 film adaptation. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary.

That is what I am accusing you of trying to do. You're very bad at it and this is a very poor forum to try it on, but you persist.
It is very easy to give an opinion. But facts is actually needed.

What I said about Zola is the Truth. You saw for yourself. While you were doubting and giving all sorts of wrong judgments I knew it to be the Truth. And the mistake all made was in judging without doing your homework.

Sloppiness. I warned you about it and now you have to eat it.

It is not sloppy to doubt a proven liar when they make claims yet offer no proof.

Nope. I gave the proof. You are too lazy to take a good look at it.

WRONG.

That's another bald-faced lie and I think you know it.

You could have investigated. It was there all the time. Just waiting on you. So what do you call evidence sitting there and you not finding it? And everybody knows that it is just something of "log in".

If you're a deity, are you the god of lame excuses? It sounds like you STILL don't quite understand what the problem was. It must have been someone else in your circle who figured it out.

I contacted the man whose Facebook page you kept spamming. He never replied.
 
BWAHAHAHAHA. So, you admit that your "son" borked the thing you harassed him into doing,

That is only your opinion. But since you admit he is there you can ask him. At least he is there. So unlike your ghosts.
I never denied he was there. I never denied that he existed. In fact, nobody did. That is in your imagination only.

What actually happened was that it took two and a half weeks of being told that your claimed "mother" image was not present on the link that you relentlessly spammed before you bothered to rectify matters. None of us could fix it and none of us could rectify your clumsy blunder. Nobody but the account holder could do that. You then had the brass bollocks to turn around and blame EVERYONE for your own inept blundering.

and then after weeks of being told that it was borked, you finally harassed him into correcting the blunder.

Yep. It was a mistake. Which most said was deceit from my side. Now you said it is a "blunder". But what did you say originally?
Originally, I said that it was a picture of two blokes drinking in a shed.

Why did I say that? Because that was what was there at the time. And it was not just me. Everyone told you that. Screenshots were posted. There was not much more we could do.

Then you accuse US of being sloppy?

You could have investigated. It was there all the time. Just waiting on you. So what do you call evidence sitting there and you not finding it? And everybody knows that it is just something of "log in".
I was logged in and your claimed picture was not there.

**** off and own your own blunders.

As I said. What did you originally say about it. And why?
You provided the link, I followed the link, the picture you claimed was simply not there. Just two blokes drinking in a shed.
 

Back
Top Bottom