Delphic Oracle
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2016
- Messages
- 6,416
I never moved them.
I said context matters, you present examples with clear context.
Perhaps not a goalposts shift. Seems more like outright non sequitur on second thought.
I'm not intelligent enough to give you an answer to the question you pose. Our civilization has been around for a long time, and we haven't solved this issue yet, so I'm fairly sure not a lot of people are intelligent enough to solve it. All I am asking is that we acknowledge the fact that free speech cannot be an absolute right, because sometimes that right would infringe upon other rights, including other people's right to free speech.
I've not advocated said absolute position.
Out of curiosity how does one person speaking prevent another from also doing so?
Because that vague claim could just as easily be spun from a desire to shut down dissent.