• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CNN Doxxes a gif maker

I see we're at the point of the thread were TBD declares victory despite failing to establish that even the title of the thread is true.
 
I see we're at the point of the thread were TBD declares victory despite failing to establish that even the title of the thread is true.

Oh you mean with the exception of the numerous authoritative links I posted?

'K.

Lol
 
I see we have reached the point of the thread where NF starts flooding the thread with nonsense.

CNN's grossly unethical conduct established, thread over, ain't nothing left here but white flags and attempts to change the subject.

4 days between posts = "flooding"

You people have a bizarre affliction that causes you to not only get the definitions of common words and phrases wrong, but you manage to define them with the exact opposite of what they actually mean.

Fake news indeed.
 
4 days between posts = "flooding"

You people have a bizarre affliction that causes you to not only get the definitions of common words and phrases wrong, but you manage to define them with the exact opposite of what they actually mean.

Fake news indeed.

Well, it is hard to argue with quality arguments that include:

"You people."

Other than my comprehensive and authoritative links and citations that I have posted in this thread, of course.

I have included a summary of same in my sig.
 
nm

ETA

Unlike CNN, KTVN doesn't hold back when it comes to identifying open racists.
I'll just say that this guy was at a rally in a public place and did not try to hide his identity. I don't know why an "open racist" would be concerned about being revealed. Maybe he regrets it, but no mask, public place. Not really a good comparison IMO.
 
Last edited:
I'll just say that this guy was at a rally in a public place and did not try to hide his identity. I don't know why an "open racist" would be concerned about being revealed. Maybe he regrets it, but no mask, public place. Not really a good comparison IMO.

Suppose he had a mask but let it slip just once. Would news outlets have to cooperate with him by pretending it had remained in place? That seems perfectly analogous to the situation here, wherein HAS gave away enough personal details to identify him.
 
How is it "doxxing" to identify people who appeared in public at a rally and have given media interviews about their beliefs?
Did I say it was?

I prefer the more generally useful and less morally loaded term "identifying," myself. You can identify someone from their face, from their email address, license plate, Reddit posts, etc.
 
I'll just say that this guy was at a rally in a public place and did not try to hide his identity. I don't know why an "open racist" would be concerned about being revealed. Maybe he regrets it, but no mask, public place. Not really a good comparison IMO.

The idea that the internet is not a public place is laughable.
 

Back
Top Bottom