Johanabrahams
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2017
- Messages
- 994
You're right but not in the way you think you are.
Enlighten us then.
You're right but not in the way you think you are.
Let me help you out. The spiritual life is made up. It's not real.
I have no spiritual mother because there are no gods and there are no spirits in the sense you're talking about.
You do not really believe that so many will make up something that does not exist. Even the differences and struggle between them is never about His existence. Every on that speak in that sphere of life is a witness about the existence of God and on the fact that he/she met Him in a certain way. You will not understand people speaking about God without this understanding. It will look like madness or ignorance or whatever your reasoning. But whatever your reasoning you will not be satisfied with it. The reason is that all of those people can not be mad. They also can not be ignorant. Or whatever your reasoning.
That is just your opinion. And because you have not met Him you can not say that He does not exist. About the "spiritual mother": You will not understand me and my reasons and motivation to be here except in that context.
I've never said you were against the Bible. I claim no expertise in the Bible so I have no idea if you're in compliance with it or not. I don't particularly care if you are or not. Gods don't exist; therefore texts claiming to speak for them are unimportant.
Johan, as I've told you before, none of this can be considered as teaching us anything.You do not really believe that so many will make up something that does not exist. Even the differences and struggle between them is never about His existence. Every on that speak in that sphere of life is a witness about the existence of God and on the fact that he/she met Him in a certain way. You will not understand people speaking about God without this understanding. It will look like madness or ignorance or whatever your reasoning. But whatever your reasoning you will not be satisfied with it. The reason is that all of those people can not be mad. They also can not be ignorant. Or whatever your reasoning.
That is just your opinion. And because you have not met Him you can not say that He does not exist. About the "spiritual mother": You will not understand me and my reasons and motivation to be here except in that context.
You're the god, figure it out.
You accept Judaism? Islam? Hinduism? Buddhism? Shamanism? Druidism? Voodooism? Satanism? Paganism? New Ageism in all it's forms? Deism? Pantheism? Panentheism? B'ahai? Polytheism?You do not really believe that so many will make up something that does not exist. Even the differences and struggle between them is never about His existence. Every on that speak in that sphere of life is a witness about the existence of God and on the fact that he/she met Him in a certain way. You will not understand people speaking about God without this understanding. It will look like madness or ignorance or whatever your reasoning. But whatever your reasoning you will not be satisfied with it. The reason is that all of those people can not be mad. They also can not be ignorant. Or whatever your reasoning.
Everything you post is "just your opinion".That is just your opinion.
I have seen no evidence for the existence of any of the many claimed deities. None. No more that there is evidence for universe forming pixies. Do you believe the universe was created by universe forming pixies? Why not?And because you have not met Him you can not say that He does not exist.
I did my research, I understand exactly what motivates you to make such claims. Now, I refuse to publicly post to whom I spoke, nor what they told me as that would be unfair to you, and to them for that matter. In fact, the condition of any communications was that they not be republished and that anonymity was sacrosanct. I respect that. But don't be under some illusion that you can pull the wool over my eyes with your sanctimonious baloney.About the "spiritual mother": You will not understand me and my reasons and motivation to be here except in that context.
It's not Christian at all.
Earlier I claimed I was not a Christian.
With strippers and beer!
This signature is intended to irritate people.
You do not really believe that so many will make up something that does not exist.
Dragons are real?
Huh...
Not fully, but you are arrogating a lot of christian beliefs to yourself.
God, the supernatural, souls and spirits and telepathy to mention a few are reality but not provable - just as the birth of the universe is reality and a prime cause is reality but probably unknowable.
The difference between adult woo-deniers and adult believers is that believers know the difference between fairy tales and reality.
Dragons, goblins, leprechauns, Santa Claus, the Easter bunny, unicorns, orbiting teapots, spaghetti monsters are to entertain kids (or the kids in us) as fairy tales.
God, the supernatural, souls and spirits and telepathy to mention a few are reality but not provable - just as the birth of the universe is reality and a prime cause is reality but probably unknowable.
The con artists market psychic surgery, teleportation, telekinesis and things that fall into the category of major miracles. They are frauds. A major miracle may be possible but only a few may have happened.
The difference between adult woo-deniers and adult believers is that believers know the difference between fairy tales and reality.
Dragons, goblins, leprechauns, Santa Claus, the Easter bunny, unicorns, orbiting teapots, spaghetti monsters are to entertain kids (or the kids in us) as fairy tales.
God, the supernatural, souls and spirits and telepathy to mention a few are reality but not provable - just as the birth of the universe is reality and a prime cause is reality but probably unknowable.
The con artists market psychic surgery, teleportation, telekinesis and things that fall into the category of major miracles. They are frauds. A major miracle may be possible but only a few may have happened.
The difference between adult woo-deniers and adult believers is that believers know the difference between fairy tales and reality.
Dragons, goblins, leprechauns, Santa Claus, the Easter bunny, unicorns, orbiting teapots, spaghetti monsters are to entertain kids (or the kids in us) as fairy tales.
God, the supernatural, souls and spirits and telepathy to mention a few are reality but not provable - just as the birth of the universe is reality and a prime cause is reality but probably unknowable.
The con artists market psychic surgery, teleportation, telekinesis and things that fall into the category of major miracles. They are frauds. A major miracle may be possible but only a few may have happened.
You do not really believe that so many will make up something that does not exist.
The reason is that all of those people can not be mad. They also can not be ignorant. Or whatever your reasoning.
The difference between adult woo-deniers and adult believers is that believers know the difference between fairy tales and reality.
You do not really believe that so many will make up something that does not exist. Even the differences and struggle between them is never about His existence. Every on that speak in that sphere of life is a witness about the existence of God and on the fact that he/she met Him in a certain way. You will not understand people speaking about God without this understanding. It will look like madness or ignorance or whatever your reasoning. But whatever your reasoning you will not be satisfied with it. The reason is that all of those people can not be mad. They also can not be ignorant. Or whatever your reasoning.
That is just your opinion. And because you have not met Him you can not say that He does not exist. About the "spiritual mother": You will not understand me and my reasons and motivation to be here except in that context.