Belz...
Fiend God
Why should Trump Jr. have thought that this alleged information was obtained criminally?
How else would they have obtained it?
Why should Trump Jr. have thought that this alleged information was obtained criminally?
I find him hugely entertaining. Not just what he says, but the entire presentation. He's out of central casting, for what role I'm not sure.
It never changes. Until the next lie is revealed, of course Trump and his minions are to be believed.What makes you think the information never materialized?
Apparently, Hannity cited the Politico story last night in his knee-jerk defense of all things Trump.
WaPo provides details here.
What's the term? Oh yeah... Nothingburger.
How else would they have obtained it?
What makes you think the information never materialized?
Why should Trump Jr. have thought that this alleged information was obtained criminally? The fact that it was (again, allegedly) coming from the Russian government isn't proof of criminality. Furthermore, why should T. Jr. have called the FBI about alleged information never materialized and may never have existed?
That depends very much on what exactly the information was, doesn't it? And Trump Jr. didn't know what it was. Lots of oppo research comes from sources other than hacking.
Isn't that one of the neo-con clique who conned you into starting the war on Iraq that devastated the whole region, killed millions of people, caused the refugee crisis and turned a couple of freaks in Afghanistan into a huge army of terrorists in more than a decade of bogus "war on terror"?
Why would anybody care what a crackpot like him thinks about anything?![]()
Just spitballing here, but how about "because reporting a credible foreign interference with American election is in the national interest" ?
The fact that it wasn't reported suggests that the Trump campaign was not prioritizing the national interest over personal interest.
From Russia?
To summarize: Instead of Trump Jr. and campaign officials meeting directly with someone who may have directly obtained opposition research from a foreign government, they should have paid some party-loyalist "consultant" to meet with someone who obtained opposition research from a foreign government as a go-between so there would be no appearance of direct collusion by the campaign.
Because there's no signs that it ever did.
Let's see you apply that standard to Hillary's campaign and their collusion with Ukraine.
Yes. I'm surprised you need to be reminded of the uranium deal that Clinton's State Dept. approved, and the subsequent major donations to the Clinton Foundation. There's potentially a lot of information about that deal (and others) which the Russian government might have legal access to.
HOW MUCH DOES PUTIN PAY YOU ?
Yes. I'm surprised you need to be reminded of the uranium deal that Clinton's State Dept. approved, and the subsequent major donations to the Clinton Foundation. There's potentially a lot of information about that deal (and others) which the Russian government might have legal access to.