Zivan has corrected him on that at least four times now, maybe more. KOTA completely ignores this every time, and keeps claiming the amount of lights on the menorah has changed. Not only is this false, not only has this been pointed out more than should be neccesary, but even if he were right, it wouldn't support his own claims in the slightest.
He claims that the menorah was based on a stylized map of atlantis, neatly broken in half, with the part closest to the coast remaining, and the more elevated part gone (because that's how floods work, right?).
He needs to show:
There is a symbol that was meant to signify Atlantis.
This symbol changed over time to half a city plan.
The ancient Israelites came into contact with a culture that used this new version of the symbol and decided to model their temple lamp on it.
He hasn't provided evidence for any of that. In fact, he didn't even provide an image of the Spanish carving, but told us to watch the movie. I did, but he still refused to discuss it.
For reference, here is a still from the movie, showing the badly eroded symbol that KOTA claims represents both a map of Atlantis, with three concentric circles and a trident representing Poseidon's temple, and an upside down menorah with 7 arms and a stand.
The bottom one is traced by me, in an effort to make the lines a little clearer.
As you can see, there are more than three arches, which means it neither corresponds with Atlantis, nor with the menorah. And the part that is supposed to represent either the menorah's stand, or the canal and temple isn't there, because the vertical line does not extend beyond the outer arch.
Basically, he's got nothing.
