Merged Is a a Trump impeachment likely?

Is a Trump impeachment likely?

  • Yes, expect to see it happen sometime in the near future.

    Votes: 38 31.1%

  • No, Trump is safe(for now)

    Votes: 46 37.7%

  • Don't know

    Votes: 18 14.8%

  • On planet X Trump will dissolve Congress fire everyone and declare himself POTUS for life

    Votes: 20 16.4%
  • Total voters
    122
dejudge said:
Once Comey presents his memos then it would be all over for Trump. It was most bizarre that people believed a pathological liar could make America great.

Perhaps Trump will resign before impeachment and blame the Democrats.
Click to expand...

Only in a partially reasonable world. Republicans will trash Comey and pass it off as a joke, despite this being contradictory.
 
applecorped said:
Impeached for what?
Click to expand...

c4jt321.png
 
I have been really terrible at predicting Trump things, but I would say that Trump will be impeached sooner or later, unless Trump decides to cut out before such a thing were to happen (like his dead mentor Nixon did).
 
applecorped said:
Impeached for what?
Click to expand...
Hello I am prince Hungry81 from Nigeria. My father was King of Wakonda but was recently killed in an explosion while giving a speach at the famous Skovia accords. You may have seen about it on TV. Or other cinematics. My fathers enemies are using this opportunity to drive me into exile and take over. At the moment I have hundreds of millions of dollars in my secreet accounts that I can access if you help me. However I need your help. If you give me your help I can give you a fair percntage and give you a generous discount if you wish to purchase a bridge in London that I also own. God blesses you. All I need from you is....
 
Last edited:
Hungry81 said:
Impeached for what?
Click to expand...

Hello I am prince Hungry81 from Nigeria. My father was King of Wakonda but was recently killed in an explosion while giving a speach at the famous Skovia accords. You may have seen about it on TV. Or other cinematics. My fathers enemies are using this opportunity to drive me into exile and take over. At the moment I have hundreds of millions of dollars in my secreet accounts that I can access if you help me. However I need your help. If you give me your help I can give you a fair percntage and give you a generous discount if you wish to purchase a bridge in London that I also own. God blesses you. All I need from you is....
Click to expand...

:dl:

Masterful.
 
I think an eventual one is likely, but not an immediate one. The problem is a Republican Congress who backed him for president, and the president's own supporters who may punish unfaithful and unloyal Republican Congresspeoples.

The Republicans have made their bed and they will spend a few more years worrying about what their man has done this time. It's a kind of purgatory that they, if not anyone else, fully deserve.
 
marplots said:
If Hillary can survive Benghazi and the e-mails, Trump can survive this.

Depending, of course, on just what "this" turns out to be. I don't think anyone really knows yet.
Click to expand...

The two you note were both pointless idiot talking points, not real malfeasance. Without Fox and related feeding republickers their daily load of **** sandwiches and poison pills neither would have gone anywhere.

There was no there there!!!! With Trumpf the there is blindingly clear and bright.
 
Last edited:
Upchurch said:
I agree with this, with the exception that Trump has no balls.

(Metaphorically, of course.)

Trump's narcissism won't let him get into a position where he loses, so he'll do what he always does in these situations and declare a strategic bankruptcy with a premise of a rigged system and forces conspiring against him.

On the other hand, and here I hope I'm wrong, this Republican-run House will never impeach a Republican President. This isn't the 70s. Integrity is a thing of the past. Party before county.
Click to expand...
And perfectly accurate as this **** started with Reagan and the party giving up being Republicans by joining with the (IM) moral majority right wing xtian fools!!!!! And thus turning into fools:aka republickers.
 
I don't believe there is really anything to impeach about. If all Comey's memo says is that Trump said "Flynn's a good guy, I hope you can let this go," then I don't think that's enough. If there is more direct evidence of obstruction in the memos, then maybe there's something there but it also brings up the idea that if Comey thought there was obstruction going on, he had a duty to report it when it was happening.

I've heard the theory that obstruction would be evidenced by Trump firing Comey, however, McCabe very clearly said that the investigation was not impeded by this. I guess maybe you could make the case that it was Trump's intention to impede the investigation, however Rosenstein, the same guy who called for Special Counsel, did write a memo to Trump recommending the removal of Comey. It isn't so clear cut.

If he's going to be impeached, it will have to be for something we don't know about yet, like there's evidence he actually colluded with Russia, took bribes, etc. But that's going to take awhile to develop now that there is Special Counsel investigating.
 
xjx388 said:
it also brings up the idea that if Comey thought there was obstruction going on, he had a duty to report it when it was happening.
Click to expand...

I see this being claimed a lot. Who exactly did he have a duty to report it to?
 
PhantomWolf said:
I see this being claimed a lot. Who exactly did he have a duty to report it to?
Click to expand...

18 USC Section 4

Obstruction being a felony, Comey would have had an obligation to report it to a judge, the Attorney General or some other authority. I guess it remains possible that he did indeed report it but in that case it seems odd that we wouldn't have heard about it already; I mean, there's your impeachable offense right there.
 
xjx388 said:
18 USC Section 4

Obstruction being a felony, Comey would have had an obligation to report it to a judge, the Attorney General or some other authority. I guess it remains possible that he did indeed report it but in that case it seems odd that we wouldn't have heard about it already; I mean, there's your impeachable offense right there.
Click to expand...

He's a law enforcement officer. He knows there are ongoing investigations. If you think every crime committed is instantly brought to a judge's attention then you are wrong. It would be like not busting a small crime or small offense or maybe just waiting for more conclusive evidence.
 
I voted no simply because of the "for now" clause. With all the evidence so far, I think he can weather the storm for the time being. However, I don't think he'll make it through four years. He can't help but create more and more enemies and make more and more blunders. Who knows what these investigations will dig up? We'll have to wait to see what this investigation digs up and also wait to see who he pisses off and what other laws he will break in the future. He's a continuous accident waiting to happen. I think the good news is that most of his ridiculous agenda is in jeopardy but the bad news is that if we have some major crisis, we may be stuck with the worst possible captain at the helm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom