Tony Stark
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2014
- Messages
- 9,626
And rosenstein signed his name to it. What is his problem?
His problem is Trump lying about the memo being the reason behind the firing.
And rosenstein signed his name to it. What is his problem?
Regardless how scathing, and regardless that Rosenstein might be sincere, it appears he was used in a kabuki show.His letter is nothing short of scathing. Why wouldn't it be the grounds for firing?
He literally talks about how serious it is to fire the director right before he says the director can't fix himself. Rubenstein has nothing to complain about.
His problem is Trump lying about the memo being the reason behind the firing.
If you are asked to write a memo to be a reason for firing, you can't be angry when it is cited as the reason.
You can if they aren't the real reasons.
No, you can't. His mission was to drum up a reason. He succeeded.
And now Trump is lying and so he's mad about it.
I mentioned this in a previous post, but I do (tend to) think that Rosenstein's memo was sincere, and Trump may have simply seen it as a convenient pretext. I really don't know what Trump was thinking except that it may have been a rash, impulsive move. And instead of letting Comey exit a little more gracefully, he was simply unceremoniously fired and found out about it on TV.
But an FBI director deserves better treatment when being dismissed.
As I posted above, I don't care for Comey. I thought his rewriting the meaning of "negligence" to require "intent" with respect to Clinton's mishandling of classified materials was either incompetent or politically motivated. But I just heard Comey found out about his dismissal while in the middle of giving a speech when the "TV" in the background ran headline across the screen behind him. If accurate, that's pretty cold. I don't mind that he's out, and Democrats are acting like political hypocrites as usual. But an FBI director deserves better treatment when being dismissed.
No, you can't. His mission was to drum up a reason. He succeeded.
You're assuming he was actually told that he was looking for a reason to fire Comey. Which is to say, you're expecting one of the few Toupee Fiasco loyalists who knew about this to be telling the truth about how this all went down, in an anonymous leak.
That's not a very good bet.
I wouldn't be at all shocked if they asked him for a writeup on what Comey did wrong in his Clinton announcements, and then used it as pretext without telling him about their plan.
Regardless, another example of the clown president being his own worst enemy.
Comey said:It makes me mildly nauseous that we would have had an impact on the election.
You're assuming he was actually told that he was looking for a reason to fire Comey. Which is to say, you're expecting one of the few Toupee Fiasco loyalists who knew about this to be telling the truth about how this all went down, in an anonymous leak.
That's not a very good bet.
I wouldn't be at all shocked if they asked him for a writeup on what Comey did wrong in his Clinton announcements, and then used it as pretext without telling him about their plan.
Regardless, another example of the clown president being his own worst enemy.
"Kinda?" He totally would have deserved it, and I would have said that the hellbeast occupying the Oval Office did something smart. I might even have thought there was a small chance for him to be serious about "draining the swamp." The hope would have proven false of course but, when it comes down to it, President Obama should have taken Comey out himself.
Blumenthal: Comey firing 'may well produce impeachment proceedings'
Washington (CNN)Sen. Richard Blumenthal said Wednesday that President Donald Trump's decision to fire his FBI director could lead to possible impeachment proceedings in Congress.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/10/politics/richard-blumenthal-james-comey-cnntv/index.html
I do believe that the reasons outlined in the memo are strong reasons to fire Comey. I do not at all believe that Trump believed them though. There is no valid reason to give Trump the benefit of the doubt on that. Repeating that he has the right to do it is not evidence he was right to do it, or that he did it for the right (reasons).
The irony there is if he had the Republicans would be screaming from the rooftops about how politically motivated and vindictive such a baseless firing would have been.
If you wish to be shocked, by all means research this guy.
https://www.google.com.mx/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=7NUTWZPwII7D8geNmL_oBw&gws_rd=ssl#q=sheriff+david+clarke
Too many links, too little time... Have fun (?)
If Obama had let him go, there would have been charges that he was stalling the Clinton investigation. No matter who let him go or when they did it, there was going to be a backlash because that's the way partisan politics works.
The only question that matters to me is: Did Comey deserve to be fired? If the answer is, "yes," then Trump did the right thing.