Have you seen God.........
No one has. It's a figment of the imagination of some Arab goat herders in the bronze age middle east.
Have you seen God.........
Which one is the real one? This is a rhetorical question, We all know it's FSM.
Mangled the quote function again did we?
God is a concept by which we measure our pain
no I would not as they were not wrong. They were growing . . .to understand better.That's what I said.
Every theist in history has "known" that their god existed, and yet you'd agree that they were all wrong except those who worshipped your god...
My method is not to know . . .but to be.how do you know that they're wrong and you're right if your method is the exact same as theirs?
My God just kicked the ass of your God.
Therefore, my God is a better god than your God.
To me this always poses a contradiction.
A truly loving god would not need a religion, after all, it would love it's creation and therefore anything we do is good and thus there is no need for any of the trappings of the many earthly religions.
So if you truly believe god is good and loving, there is no need to preach, no need to convert, no need to convince and certainly no need to proscribe things, as god loves all.
On the other hand, the 'love' described in the torah, bible and koran (and maybe other religions, but I don't know those that well), to me always comes across as the love of an abusive, drunk parent. Sure, that parent loves you, provided you follow all the rules and meekly accept getting beaten if she/he is drunk and angry so they can forgive you for bruising their fists the next day. And those that preach this 'love' always come across as the older siblings that have just accepted this state of being and now tell the rest how to get beaten as little as possible.
Ah, it's a classic:
[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/zsH6T1D.jpg[/qimg]
.....
http://johanabrahams.pnyhost.com/New Revelations.html
(Go there to Worthy Christian Forums - the latest one and the best captured by me)
Glad you can see it . . . .that is not the real Jesus.Maff(ia) love.
In her fantastic monologue "Letting Go Of God" about her journey from devoted Catholic to atheist, Julia Sweeney says that while she was in the middle of having her doubts she started to think for the first time about Jesus atoning for everybody's sins and it occurred to her that a lot of people on Earth have suffered a lot more than he did - she cites her brother's long battle with cancer. She came to the conclusion that Jesus "had a bad weekend for our sins".
I'm sure I saw a documentary recently with him doing a bit of fighting. It was called Thor if you're interested.
According to this he was a bit of a knob.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomon
Managed to wreck the whole kingdom? Sounds like his ability to judge was a bit rubbish, quite frankly.
nope they do not have the ability . . .because if you have it you will not make mistakes. They try because the have heard about it. . . and saw it being done. But how it really works . . .they do not know.I asked you to make sense and you throw a self-contradictory post at me.
If humans are doing it, then they have the ability to do so.
But that's not what you said earlier, was it?
And what did you actually say here anyway? To say God does not fight is to say nothing except that God is God. A god that can destroy cities and cause plagues and flood the earth does not need to fight, of course.
And if there's only one god, then obviously he does not have to fight his equals, for there are none.
When I spray a hornets' nest with insecticide I'm not exactly fighting either, but that does not make me the good guy (at least from a hornet's standpoint).
And by the way, not to be too nitpicky, but the singular of "species" is "species."
The Bible is not a history book.
Well, you are quite wrong.
Humans do have an excellent ability to judge and that is a big part of the reason why you are able to say otherwise now.
you missed the fact that I said . . .it was given him as a gift from God. Meaning he didn't have it.He was a human. Therefore humans have that ability.
Because you missed a very important fact you judge wrongly given evidence to your inability to judge.Second contradiction.
Tell us more.In fact, I'd say, based on your "history book" (snicker) that humans are actually better at judgment than god.
Well you know about "charitable" so you have to do it . . .if you want to be "good"As an opening bid, you have failed to demonstrate that "every specie[sic]" (I will be charitable, and assume you mean 'species') "fight".
Even the "specie[sic]" that do fight, only have the capacity for "fighting" because they do, in fact, demonstrably exist.
Whether you believe your 'god' "fights" is immaterial, unless and until you demonstrate, with concrete, practical, testable, objective, non-anecdotal evidence, that your 'god' actually exists.