Merged A God of Love / The Living God

yep . . .every specie on earth fight . . .but God does not.
But that's not what you said earlier, was it?


And what did you actually say here anyway? To say God does not fight is to say nothing except that God is God. A god that can destroy cities and cause plagues and flood the earth does not need to fight, of course. And if there's only one god, then obviously he does not have to fight his equals, for there are none. When I spray a hornets' nest with insecticide I'm not exactly fighting either, but that does not make me the good guy (at least from a hornet's standpoint).

And by the way, not to be too nitpicky, but the singular of "species" is "species."
 
Human beings have a problem. They do not have the ability to judge. But even though they do not have it they are still doing it. Only God has that ability. History has it that there was only one. He was king Solomon. He did it by a gift that God gave him.

Love Johan
The Bible is not a history book.
 
Human beings have a problem. They do not have the ability to judge. But even though they do not have it they are still doing it. Only God has that ability. History has it that there was only one. He was king Solomon. He did it by a gift that God gave him.

Love Johan

Well, you are quite wrong.

Humans do have an excellent ability to judge and that is a big part of the reason why you are able to say otherwise now.
 
Human beings have a problem. They do not have the ability to judge. But even though they do not have it they are still doing it. Only God has that ability. History has it that there was only one. He was king Solomon. He did it by a gift that God gave him.

He was a human. Therefore humans have that ability. Second contradiction.

In fact, I'd say, based on your "history book" (snicker) that humans are actually better at judgment than god.
 
yep . . .every specie on earth fight . . .but God does not.

As an opening bid, you have failed to demonstrate that "every specie[sic]" (I will be charitable, and assume you mean 'species') "fight".

Even the "specie[sic]" that do fight, only have the capacity for "fighting" because they do, in fact, demonstrably exist.

Whether you believe your 'god' "fights" is immaterial, unless and until you demonstrate, with concrete, practical, testable, objective, non-anecdotal evidence, that your 'god' actually exists.
 
It's easy to distinguish. Most people make sense, you make word salad.

Add some salt then enjoy


No, it really isn't.
Ok . . all do not think alike



Phew, thank you, I was about to have a panic attack.
over such a small matter?




Clever. You are my new internet hero.

I am going to introduce you to the real one.

ps. It's available all over the place, just like the quote function.

Thanks

Sorry, I love my girlfriend and don't do threesomes.

I was actually speaking about "motherly love"
 
I still have most of those brownies I baked. Anyone want some to tide us over until Johan starts telling us the things he says he's been wanting to tell us about?

I already gave a lot . . .but maybe you missed them. Don't just read what I am writing to you. We are all together in this.

Love Johan
 
I already gave a lot . . .but maybe you missed them. Don't just read what I am writing to you. We are all together in this.

Love Johan

You have yet to post a single thing that might even charitably be considered objective, non-anecdotal, empirical evidence for the existence of your 'god'...
 
Last edited:
Why do I say that? Because I am God ,The Creator of the universe, earth, and Bacon./
Ok so you created everything. Good .. .maybe you can restore for us some of the things we messed up



You claim to speak for, and know the thoughts of a loving God. I'm just setting the record straight.
So . . .was I wrong about your thoughts?


You could try using the quote function, at least.
Yep . . .I tried and gave up . . but there were some . . .not you . . that gave me a helping hand . . .you can learn from them.

But I am not angry . . .I forgive you.

Love Johan
 
in your opinion yes. . . but I know different. So what is it that I know and you do not?

Love Johan

You are, as is usually the case with superstitionists, misusing the regular English verb "know".

You believe a good many things that I (for one) do not; you have yet to provide the least bit of actual evidence for some of the things you profess to believe.
 
If by on the same page you mean willing to exchange ideas in an atmosphere of congeniality and respect, even if, nay ESPECIALLY if we do not see eye to eye?

Then hell yes!

Thanks for asking!

Good brother . . .how can two be the same . . .but they can love . . .and love being the glue in their differences because they know they have the same Father . .. making them brothers . . not to be separated by what the Father decided to reveal to each other so that they can be two and not one.

But we know in history religion has managed separation countless of times for those that built on it. But still there was only one Father.

One Father with the same love for all of His children. Some are older . . have grown more in the Life of Jesus . . and some not . . making them of different age . . .but never something else . . .still brothers. And how can anyone not love his brother . . .even as the Father loves him.


Love Johan
 

Back
Top Bottom