Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

[markie]

(snip)
I guess I'll end with a question for markie: you've been a fan for over a decade, and know very well what Mills papers, books, etc say. You also know, or could easily confirm, the capabilities and competence of the of the coauthors etc. And you know that not one of them has independently confirmed the existence of hydrinos (etc). Not to mention doing things that will bring them great fame and fortune. Does this concern you at all? Are you puzzled by it?

Of course others have independently confirmed the excess energy of hydrino formation, the spectroscopic evidence of hydrino formation, and the signatures of hydrino or dihydrino or hydrino hydride. You seem to believe that every positive scientific paper / experiment about hydrino has Mills as an author. Such is not the case.

 

[Red Baron Farms]

Good article. At least we can agree on something.
But your glaring error is assuming Mills is wrong.
How about you complain about the *billions* of *taxpayer* dollars that truly have been squandered on this or that.

There is no "glaring error is assuming Mills is wrong". The simple fact of the matter is that Mills has failed to provide evidence hydrinos exist. Further he has failed to show his BLP units produce energy in some novel way.

I posted that link because it is a rough outline of my research and development. (actually my development part is but a tiny tiny part of a larger effort and all I did was provide a summary of mostly what others have done). There is at least one of those researchers I cited who actually has been awarded a Nobel prize for his work. lead author of IPCC (1998-2000) which earned him the Nobel Peace Prize Certificate. Another won the Buckminster Fuller Challenge 2010
another won the Heinz Awards another the 2012 Conservation Research Award More than one published in Nature

I could go on and on. There are multiple 10 years case studies of working examples in the field from several continents, multiple published independent studies, Literally millions of farmers in the field using one of the many methods I mentioned, setting world records even.......

And yet the evidence for what I proposed is considered slim at best, and needing much more confirmation, mostly anecdotal. I took all kinds of flack in this very forum for suggesting it was all but proven beyond a doubt. A lesson I won't soon forget. Which is why when I wrote that I remembered to say in big bolded letters, It’s still unrecognised by the accepted mainstream, but with recent advancements in biological sciences and agricultural methods, it can no longer be called impossible.


That's the best I can claim. It isn't impossible. Still a long long way before I can claim the consensus is it actually will work.

Compare that with Mills' scam............. and you want to accuse me of assuming? Really?

PS As far as squandered "*billions* of *taxpayer* dollars", Not one thin dime of anyone's money have I seen, period, not angel investors, not government grants, not charity funding, nada zip zero. Kinda insulted by your implication any of that research by me or anyone else I cited would be squandered.

 

[Reality Check]

Of course others have independently confirmed the excess energy of hydrino formation, ....

Of course, markie, that is multiple fantasies based on your assumptions that

• the excess energy, etc. have no explanation using physics not based on Mills ignorance and delusions and
• hydrino's exist despite Mills ignorance, delusions and lies about physics in his book.

Part I: 37 items of ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book
Part II: 24 items of ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book
Part III: 18 items of ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book

12 April 2017 markie: How do beta decay electrons get thru multiple "orbitspheres"? (and other questions and items of ignorance).

And from the same day:
12 April 2017 markie: A 2012 paper showing a Mills lie about spectra and conventional explanations for them (no hydrinos need apply!)

 

[The Norseman]

No, I'm calling him mistaken in predicting that the externally validated energy cells could be tweaked and improved sufficiently to make them into a commercial viable product.

The solution seems blatant in that he can demonstrate to the world the possibilities of commercial viability, right now. Today. Or even ten years ago. Or fifteen years ago. Or twenty years ago.

All he has to do is reveal the machine, warts and all, and all the fame and glory will still belong to Mills but then thousands of other minds can put their efforts into making it into a commercial viability.

The reason he doesn't, of course, is that he's greedy. Pure selfishness, nothing more.

And this even grants him the kind of training and background which he does not have; this is no longer a world of shade-tree inventors, which Mills clearly is. Formal training for medicine translates poorly into the world of physics and quantum mechanics.

Good article. At least we can agree on something.
But your glaring error is assuming Mills is wrong.

It isn't an assumption; it's a conclusion based on decades of failure and secrecy.

How about you complain about the *billions* of *taxpayer* dollars that truly have been squandered on this or that.

Oh, I do. And I bet good money that others in this thread do too. And? Is this a dodge or a lame attempt to divert attention from a particular scammer?

There is a indeed a chance that Mills is not foreseeing a major obstacle with the SunCell closed, working continuously at high power. We shall see.

A chance Mills is not foreseeing a major obstacle? LOL

Apparently people in this thread have pointed out this major obstacle and they're not the inventors. How could the inventor himself miss such a major obstacle? I thought he had scientists on staff who could have pointed all this out, as well. What happened to them?

 

[Matthew Cline]

All he has to do is reveal the machine, warts and all

Not even that. All he has to do is give samples of hydrino gas to some chemists for analysis.

 

[Darat]

Several profoundly different prototypes from the 1990s to the the 2010s were validated by outside scientists to produce significant amounts of excess energy for days or even weeks.

If you could provide the references? (Hint none of the ones so far provide support for your claim.)

 

[Darat]

You strangely assume the four validation reports are all there is to it. That's only the tip of the iceberg.

For instance google one of the validators - Dr. Ramanujachary of Rowan university, with hydrino and NMR and you will see that he and Dr. Janssen have detected NMR upshifts, indicating hydrino.

Calorimetry is easy with the large excess energy amounts from hydrino formation. Add to this the various types of calorimetry that have been used, and add to this the power spectroscopy results, and add to this that hydrino itself is detected by various techniques, and the case for hydrino is firmly established from multiple angles of investigation.

And add this to the claims made by Mills to provide samples of hydrinos yet he never has done so.

Why not?

 

[Darat]

Yes it would be cheaper of course.




Well sure, give people in undeveloped electric stoves, electric pumps, electric refrigeration, etc and then you'll be getting there.

Why are you at odds with what Mills has publicly claimed is a huge benefit of his approach to power generation?

 

[Darat]

Not even that. All he has to do is give samples of hydrino gas to some chemists for analysis.

Which is something he used to offer, but for some reason it is no longer being offered..... Perhaps too many people took him at his word and asked for a sample?

 

[Sideroxylon]

The validation reports have been published on BLP's website over time. Check out http://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/ for the more recent ones.

If there had been real validation it would have been many times repeated and through various methods. The scientific world would be abuzz with new research, hydrinos would be a hot keyword accross journals and mainstream media, and people would be getting Nobels. Bullcrap.

Are you underestimating the impact of such a discovery?

 

[LTC8K6]

Several profoundly different prototypes from the 1990s to the the 2010s were validated by outside scientists to produce significant amounts of excess energy for days or even weeks.

How was this world shattering story suppressed?

And for 20 years, too?

It's got to be the biggest science news of the last 50 years at least, and it's worldwide great news.

It literally frees everyone on Earth from most energy expenses.

Yet I have to fumble around for a while with Google to find even vague information about it.

 

[Aber]

Several profoundly different prototypes from the 1990s to the the 2010s were validated by outside scientists to produce significant amounts of excess energy for days or even weeks.

If true, then these would be a basis for a commercial prototype.

Please provide the evidence to support these claims.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

For instance google one of the validators - Dr. Ramanujachary of Rowan university, with hydrino and NMR and you will see that he and Dr. Janssen have detected NMR upshifts, indicating hydrino.

You're claiming this validation, the onus is on you to cite anything you think is relevant, not to point people to google.

 

[Dave Rogers]

There is a indeed a chance that Mills is not foreseeing a major obstacle with the SunCell closed, working continuously at high power. We shall see.

You see, this is the absolute deal killer for investors. Even if Mills's scientifically impossible theories are correct, he's got a solid track record of failure, and thirty years of excuses. And even you, his most strident cheerleader, can't find anything more positive to say than that you think it'll all be different this time. Nobody in their right mind, knowing Mills's record, would invest a penny in his latest pipedream even if there were solid science behind it.

Dave

 

[Darat]

You see, this is the absolute deal killer for investors. Even if Mills's scientifically impossible theories are correct, he's got a solid track record of failure, and thirty years of excuses. And even you, his most strident cheerleader, can't find anything more positive to say than that you think it'll all be different this time. Nobody in their right mind, knowing Mills's record, would invest a penny in his latest pipedream even if there were solid science behind it.

Dave

Hard to do that when he removes so much previously published material and hides his entire site from search engines....

 

[Matthew Cline]

You see, this is the absolute deal killer for investors.

Except that BLP got $10 million last year from investors. It should be a deal killer, but it isn't.

 

[Kid Eager]

You're claiming this validation, the onus is on you to cite anything you think is relevant, not to point people to google.

...and you've been on the game for long enough to know where the evidence is, if there was evidence?

 

[LTC8K6]

Except that BLP got $10 million last year from investors. It should be a deal killer, but it isn't.

Are we sure all this investor money over the years is real?

It seems like one or two would have complained about the total lack of results.

 

[LTC8K6]

Mills was pushing a laser system for Blu-Ray players in 2003, and claimed he would have a prototype in 2003. I know he has some sort of vague laser patent, but it does not seem suitable for blu-ray type applications.

http://www.popsci.com/gear-gadgets/article/2003-06/blue-light-special

When the kinks are worked out, blue lasers will likely be the heart of next-generation DVDs, CDs, printers and scanners. Having shorter wavelengths than their red brethren, they can etch more data on a disc. It's the optical equivalent of taking a sharper pencil to paper.

But manufacturing flaws have plagued the emerging technology. The standard way to generate blue laser light is to run an electric current through a crystal or chemical. Excited electrons in the substrates then emit blue light rays. Trouble is, the substrates tend to crack under extreme heat, a glitch that ruins up to a third of all batches. And the solutions are pricey.

Liquids, however, don't crack. Enter the world's first water-based blue laser. Researchers at BlackLight Power heated water vapor with microwaves to generate
energized hydrogen atoms which
emit multispectrum light rays, including infrared, blue and violet. A prototype blue laser device is expected by the end of the year.

The team says such a multispectrum laser light could be miniaturized to micron dimensions for many microelectronic applications. "A hydrogen laser may prove to be the most useful of all," says Randell Mills, BlackLight Power's CEO.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Mills was pushing a laser system for Blu-Ray players in 2003, and claimed he would have a prototype in 2003. I know he has some sort of vague laser patent, but it does not seem suitable for blu-ray type applications.

Funny how Mills's commercial applications are always a few months away, isn't it? Of course his cheerleaders can say that blue semiconductor lasers took up the market niche so comprehensively that his water laser could never break into the market, but for a disruptive technology that's supposed to be cheaper and more reliable than the technological alternatives that's still a total and utter failure.

Dave