Henri McPhee
Illuminator
now you have truly gone of the deep end. The blue pajama fiber was totally saturated in blood and was initially thought to be a blood clot. This is indeed proof beyond "all doubt" not just beyond a reasonable doubt that the wearer of those pjs was the knife wielder.
I don't know if it was a blue pajama fiber under Kristen's fingernail, or if it had any blood on it because I have never examined it, and neither have any MacDonald defense lawyers, or forensic experts. It's all trust me I'm in the FBI lab stuff. As I have said before if it is true there is a perfectly reasonable explanation. There was skin 'lost' under a fingernail by Ivory which might have proved MacDonald's innocence now with modern DNA testing.
The matter is mentioned in that PeopleCrime article, which I think is People Magazine, by Nicole Weisensee December 29 2016:
According to the brief, the new evidence warranting the overturning of MacDonald’s conviction includes: DNA testing of unidentified hairs found beneath Colette’s body, under Kristen’s fingernail and on her bedspread on the bed where she was murdered that do not match MacDonald; Stoeckley’s confessions to her lawyer and to her mom (shortly before she died in 1983) and the statements of seven other people that she was there that night; statements from now-deceased federal marshal Jimmy Britt, who says he heard then-prosecutor Jim Blackburn threaten to arrest Stoeckley if she testified at MacDonald’s trial that she was at the scene of the killings and affidavits from three people who say Mitchell, Stoeckley’s boyfriend at the time, confessed to his involvement in the murders prior to his death.
“Had all of this newly discovered evidence been available at trial … it would have established beyond all question that reasonable doubt existed, and in fact that MacDonald is innocent,” Zeszotarski wrote.

