• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bowling Green Massacre

I would put forth that from that simple statement, one could with a high probability discern your political leanings.

“We see the world, not as it is, but as we are──or, as we are conditioned to see it.”
― Stephen R. Covey,

Be my guest, try it. You would be surprised.

here I hashed a small text where I describe my political belief.

c91260d236b0ad8d39273aa9b75bcf0d this is the md5 hash in case you think I would change the text.

Some of my political leaning you can find everywhere in this forum. I recommend you to look at somewhat older thread otherwise you will get a wrong picture.
 
Last edited:
Be my guest, try it. You would be surprised.

here I hashed a small text where I describe my political belief.

c91260d236b0ad8d39273aa9b75bcf0d this is the md5 hash in case you think I would change the text.

Sorry, I don't know what an md5 hash is nor how to link to it.

I'll take you at your word that I was wrong in my conclusion, made from one post. Fair to call hasty generalization, I suppose.
 
You have hit the nail on the head here. In fact, I would have one small quibble with the above. I would not say that they were extremely clever, I would simply say that their opponents were extremely stupid. Well, not stupid exactly. I don't know the exact word to use. Clueless? Unaware? I doubt the Trump team did it on purpose, but I think the opponents managed to turn it into a Trump win, as they did all through the campaign season.

What happened is that she made a statement trying to justify a policy, and instead of focusing on the policy, the opponents seized on the "gotcha" moment of the non-existent massacre.

Ok, that's all very well. No actual massacre,, just a couple of bad guys maybe doing some stuff that might have involved thinking about large scale killing, but what about the policy? No. No. She was lying. She made up junk about a massacre that never happened. Well, ok, sort of, I mean, there were a couple of bad guys, but that's not really important. The important thing is that they pushed this blanket ban and they're trying to avoid talking about it by bringing up other stuff that isn't important. Not important?!? She just plain LIED! There was no massacre!!!

I don't like ducking questions, so I'm going to try to answer yours. When I said I didn't feel misled, I was focusing on the statement about the massacre, because that was the focus of the thread, and of the uproar in general. I don't think she invented a story about a massacre, or about terrorists, in order to mislead people.

As to the general contents of her statement, it's hogwash. Of course their policy is a lot different than previous policies. I wouldn't have been able to tell you that Obama put travel restrictions of any sort in place during his tenure, but I didn't have to look it up to know that whatever Obama's policy was, it wasn't very much like Trump's. She's a politician spinning and dissembling. That's not really news.

This travel ban was very questionable policy, implemented in a truly oafish manner. (I started to type, "It's Trump at his worst" but that's wrong. I'm pretty sure we'll see much worse in the remaining 206 weeks of his term.) It's just the sort of think I expected when I watched the returns on November 8, hoping that Detroit and Philadelphia were just late in counting votes.

However, that particular statement didn't really have anything in it that I found noteworthy, including the reference to a massacre.
Maybe instead of picking and choosing lies, and instead of defending the ones that maybe could possibly be honest mistakes if you tilt your head and squint a bit, you can hold Trumps Team accountable for all their bull ****. By defending this lie and ignoring her other lies in the same statement YOU are deflecting the subject onto her truely honest alternitive fact mistake and containing the discussion to this one element. More than one person in this thread have bought up her other lies in this thread. You think she deserves a break for this tiny mistake? Maybe if she wasn't continually spinning deceit. Sure be frustrated that people aren't focusing on the lies or issues you want them to, but discuss them instead of downplaying a moronic and incompetent lie.

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
Sorry, I don't know what an md5 hash is nor how to link to it.

I'll take you at your word that I was wrong in my conclusion, made from one post. Fair to call hasty generalization, I suppose.

No problem. I would probably an unholy abomination mix of republican and little bit of democrats, right in the middle between both, except I view admitting one is wrong or accepting science as far more important than party allegiance, so neither party would satisfy me, in fact both regularly disgust me (in the last 10 years I will admit reps disgust me more because they don't apply what they preach or have had childish behavior, but before that I viewed reagan as a good pres (the last good rep)) why their behavior is accepted from the US citizen is beyond me. It seems to me party allegiance has become more important than real governance.
 
Last edited:
Which is vastly different than her claim about a massacre carried out in Bowling Green, KY which the press didn't cover.

To be fair she wasn't remotely clear which bowling green she thinks the massacre happened in. Maybe she meant the park in NYC? Or the one in Ohio or...
 
Oh for God sake. She lied to suit her story. There was no imprecision. End of.

As for a rational debate about whether it's good to ban Iraqi immigrants I'm not sure what debate there needs to be. It isn't. End of. Any debate on that is not going to be 'rational'

But it was only 6 years ago, you know how fast the apparent facts can change in situations like that. She clearly didn't have enough time to research before needing to go on air about how this massive attack was not covered.
 
Ok, the Bowling Green Massacre was a hoax but Muslims have massacred or tried to massacre large numbers of Americans and citizens of other countries. There will be another massacre masterminded by Muslims and it will be anything but a hoax.

Yep just like good christians do much the same. Like that nice canadian boy who killed those worthless muslims last week.

But that is exactly the kind of massacre that should be ignored I guess.
 
Keep in mind that I view correctness of information as important , above any political leaning.

And this was the politically correct information as dictated by the president. Who is the toughest and most manly president ever and not a whining thin skinned special snowflake.
 
All this simple slip up stuff.

I don't understand how one can accidently say, "there was a massacre in this city and it wasn't reported"

when what was meant to be said was, "two men were arrested for trying to sell arms to Iraq and that was reported"

Slight slip of the tongue, man. Do you know how easy it is to confuse the two?
 
Maybe instead of picking and choosing lies, and instead of defending the ones that maybe could possibly be honest mistakes if you tilt your head and squint a bit, you can hold Trumps Team accountable for all their bull ****. By defending this lie and ignoring her other lies in the same statement YOU are deflecting the subject onto her truely honest alternitive fact mistake and containing the discussion to this one element. More than one person in this thread have bought up her other lies in this thread. You think she deserves a break for this tiny mistake? Maybe if she wasn't continually spinning deceit. Sure be frustrated that people aren't focusing on the lies or issues you want them to, but discuss them instead of downplaying a moronic and incompetent lie.

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Who's ignoring what? What's the title of the thread? What's the focus of the hubbub surrounding her comments?
 

Back
Top Bottom