• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged SCotUS nominee - Neil Gorsuch

According to any sensible reading it is irrelevant.

Do you think that the framers of the amendment were retarded toddlers, or do you think that perhaps when they decided to put something down in writing as part of the fundamental rules and laws of their country they actually meant every word?
 
That is a tremendously stupid and self-centered thing to say. "What I think is best" is the exact opposite of objective, rational thought.
But if you're born again, then are permanently saved, it doesn't really matter what you do. Any poster who knows they are going to Heaven is not going to be concerned about what they post on the Internet.

ETA: I suppose you can say that of suicide bombers as well. But I'm not convinced they're all hyper-religious. Human beings can have strong destructive instincts. Sometimes it's just "I don't want to live so you can't either."

ETA2: Off topic but it's already typed. It can be construed as the difficulty of knowing what is in someone else's heart.
 
Last edited:
That is a tremendously stupid and self-centered thing to say. "What I think is best" is the exact opposite of objective, rational thought.

Not really, you do the same thing you just don't have the courage to admit it. Conservatism is rational thought, the middle is filled with gutless wonders. ;)
 
Not really, you do the same thing you just don't have the courage to admit it.

Stop making stuff up about other posters, please. You don't know me and you have no idea what I think or how I would act in a hypothetical scenario. Don't lump me with "the left", and certainly not with what YOU view as "the left".
 
But if you're born again, then are permanently saved, it doesn't really matter what you do. Any poster who knows they are going to Heaven is not going to be concerned about what they post on the Internet.

Lol

This is hilarious. I just want make sure of what you're saying before I rebut such a ridiculous post. Care to explain?
 
How is it rational to automatically assume that your POV is the only good one? It's the perfect example of irrationality.

It depends on the axioms the logic is assuming. Rational only requires an internal consistency. It doesn't actually have to justify the axioms to you.
 
Stop making stuff up about other posters, please. You don't know me and you have no idea what I think or how I would act in a hypothetical scenario. Don't lump me with "the left", and certainly not with what YOU view as "the left".

I'm not making it up, stop being dishonest about what you are. Its clear from your posts and you've admitted you're on the left. Not far left, we saw that from your made up little test.
 
Do you think that the framers of the amendment were retarded toddlers, or do you think that perhaps when they decided to put something down in writing as part of the fundamental rules and laws of their country they actually meant every word?

A) I don't hold them in high regard.

B) there is a big leap between meaning it and the phrase being operative. I absolutely do think they mean it to ensure a militia. That doesn't mean when the reason becomes irrelevant the rule changes at all. They could have wrote "to protect against unicorns" that still wouldn't change the rule.
 
Opposing Gorsuch wouldn’t be about Gorsuch, it would be about Garland. It is vital that the GOP is not rewarded for blocking the Garland nomination, or else it will only serve to encourage such actions in the future.
The 2016 elections just happened. The reward has already been bestowed.
 
I'm not making it up, stop being dishonest about what you are. Its clear from your posts and you've admitted you're on the left.

I didn't say I wasn't on the left. I asked you not to associate me with your ********** up version of what the left is. Furthermore I asked you to not pretend to know what I think or what I would do in a hypothetical situation. That is uncivil, off-topic and a personalisation.

Not far left, we saw that from your made up little test.

What's "made up" about it, aside from the fact that it's made by humans?
 
I've answered this before, not that I think anyone need have noticed or remembered.

Trump is dangerously mentally ill. Both Trump and Pence are unacceptable philosophically. That's -2 for Trump and -1 for Pence.

If you throw in the almost certain corruption that is Trump, that makes him a -3.
Thank you Dr.

Also so far there hasn't been a smidgen of evidence of corruption. Oh sorry that was the previous president.
 
I didn't say I wasn't on the left. I asked you not to associate me with your ********** up version of what the left is. Furthermore I asked you to not pretend to know what I think or what I would do in a hypothetical situation. That is uncivil, off-topic and a personalisation.
Lol
Once again you admit you're left. I don't have ********** up version of left, you seem to have that. I also never brought up a hypothetical, I've only responded to what you've said.


What's "made up" about it, aside from the fact that it's made by humans?

Yes and humans giving the answers. ;)
 
If Goresuch really is a strict constructionist;then Trump might regret appointing him.....
 
What do you imagine that would look like? If you were on the committee, what questions would you ask?

It looks like what happened today. The Dems didn't show up for the vote so the repubs took it without them, nominees confirmed.

The only option the left has is protesting and for some reason they refuse to do it nude. :jaw-dropp
 
Once again you admit you're left.

Why wouldn't I? Unlike you I accept the results of the test.

I don't have ********** up version of left

Everything not like you is left. That's not what "the left" is.

I also never brought up a hypothetical

Course you did. Right here:

Not really, you do the same thing you just don't have the courage to admit it.

Since I have not done this to your knowledge, you are building a hypothetical in which I would.

Yes and humans giving the answers.

It's a computer program. Take the test and see where you land. You might learn something. I know, learning isn't very conservative.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom