• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Valley of the Wood Apes

Status
Not open for further replies.
So how does the media play into all of this? I don't get the impression that the producers of these shows actually believe anything is out there to find. Are they taking advantage of market demand or feeding the flames of insanity? There is a new show coming out called Killing Bigfoot. It looks worse than anything else I've seen before based on the previews. I don't see how a production company could take the risk of a person getting shot but maybe it's based on different methods of capturing the bigfoot.....so they couldn't technically use the name Finding Bigfoot
 
Jodie said:
So how does the media play into all of this? I don't get the impression that the producers of these shows actually believe anything is out there to find. Are they taking advantage of market demand or feeding the flames of insanity? There is a new show coming out called Killing Bigfoot. It looks worse than anything else I've seen before based on the previews. I don't see how a production company could take the risk of a person getting shot but maybe it's based on different methods of capturing the bigfoot.....so they couldn't technically use the name Finding Bigfoot
Click to expand...
My impression is that belief or non-belief is entirely irrelevant in regard to the producers and sponsors. They care only if it sells, so the bit I highlighted is what matters, though I might add that they are not just taking advantage of market demand but creating it also.
 
LTC8K6 said:
[
Gotta wonder how these shows are ever profitable?
Click to expand...
Production is value is so low I bet they're highly profitable. All they do is take videos of people talking about something, going outside and not finding it, and then talking about it again. Add in a bit of CGI or Photoshop - really cheap these days - and voila! They stretch about 15 minutes of material into an hour time slot with something like 4–6 commercial breaks.
 
^
I agree. There is no cast to pay as well. Commercial breaks are copious during these shows. Drives me nuts, as I like to watch some reality shows, particularly the law enforcement based ones and some nature ones. You can count on at least 6 commercial breaks for some of these.
 
The longer I am away from television, the more impossible it is to watch. Our kids too - they just can't stand it.

Quick cuts, blasts of strobe lights in your eyes, panning and zooming, shaking the camera - we have to put our hands up to block the screen because it is so offensive to the eyes.

The sit-coms: line, joke, laughing box. Line, joke, laughing box. Line, joke, laughing box. The "news" is extremely offensive in terms of how blatant and juvenile the propaganda is. "My makeup and hair were prepared perfectly by a staff of seven so don't you be getting information from Wikileaks. I'll tell you what to think..."

There are very few nature shows now that offer content worthy of our children. They seem to have adopted the things we hate most about television. Attenborough is generally going to be a good bet still. History Channel became a joke and helped me convince the wife there just isn't anything at all on television worth paying for.

A number of Asian countries made the conscious decision to use education as their ticket not only to the first world, but to first place. Look at Singapore for example under Yew. From a country like the Philippines is now - a basket case - to the top of the world in measured IQ and GDP per capita.

In those top regions you have high school graduates performing nearly a full college degree ahead of cohorts in the United States, with rare exceptions like Massachusetts. At the end of high school.

That's because our culture glorifies football, basketball, television entertainment, and not academic performance as youth. Again, with the rare exceptions. You have numerous high schools in the USA producing students with 0% proficiency across the board: reading, math, and science. To me, it's incredible and becoming an ever-greater national crisis.

It is a culture-wide phenomenon, ripe for every kind of intellectual filth - bigfoot being one tiny backwater in this sea of calamity. You have SE Asians preparing to be real explorers with electron microscopes, space telescopes, cosmological mathematics, etc. They're going to find a real bigfoot in a planet from a habitable zone. It's going to be the greatest discovery in the history of mankind.

And these 'footers look with scorn upon the kids from these cultures memorizing their multiplication tables, reading hundreds of books per year, taking logic or subjects necessitating its understanding. While ours watch TV and play sports.

It's going to take the kids who lead the charge to a real interplanetary bigfoot a whole lifetime of work to do it. Whereas a kid in the USA can be a 'footer from the moment he decides to lie about it.

Fifty below zero outside so it's a school and IS marathon, lol...
 
Based on what I see in kids these days, they are more likely to look for bigfoot on a video game than bother going out into the woods. The attention span that it would take to hunt anything real or imaginary just isn't part of the " I want it now" culture that we have.
 
The low equipment/production costs nowadays to video literally everything still doesn't sway this OK think tank into coughing up the missing $5 to buy an old cellphone and take constant video of their "escapades" (so as to prove the damn Wood beast once and for all). I think I know the reason why <coughwifecough> they don't do it, but not sure. They're liable to catch a glimpse of a Wood beast but they'll be in bed when it happens.

"Oh no baby, no no, we don't want to video our entire day and night when it's just us guys here in Oklahoma slaving away looking for Wood. It would just drain the battery of a cheap cell phone and that's bad for the environment according to Meryl Streep's gardener. They say a 0% charged battery is as dangerous as a Turkish nuclear reactor. Yep it's true. So baby I think you can see why we don't want to endanger an entire county with the possibility of a dead cell phone. It's too risky. Oh baby you should see the pool waitresses here. Wait, I meant pool maintenance here. Baby?"
 
Esteemed skeptics, may I introduce to you...

http://woodape.org/index.php/news/news

One Mr. Brandon Lentz. A new Field Investigator for NAWAC. I have to say, this was a real entertaining read.

while I can tell of my experiences to others in an effort to help an undocumented species, I know that most people will look at me like I belong in a mental hospital. So be it.
Click to expand...

That's right kid, they're going to.

Here at the skeptics club we're going to study you under the guidance of the BLAARGing hypothesis, not that you are insane. This narrative of yours is so exquisitely sculpted for its deceptive character.

I don't want to drone on about it, there's plenty of juicy material for everyone. But to start with you take this little ten acre hunting cabin with a history of millions of visitors per year in the area, hundreds or thousands of deer killed by hunters leasing this very cabin.

Nobody sees bigfoot except for the kid who was fixated on it most of his life, in the hands of other 'footers who he wishes to ingratiate himself with. The place is just crawling with them. See them on the way in, while unloading the car, at night, during the day - these bigfeets are working furiously to be seen and heard.

It's a manual on how you work yourself into the Live Action Game headquarters. James Randi would send in a double agent: it can't be me. It has to be someone who they don't know and who can be a sycophant just like this kid. But take the photographs we'd love to see, record the things we'd love to hear and take the field notes that will surely split our sides open.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, we've talked about this guy.

I've even done a drawing of the drawing of the observation.
vbnMoZ.jpg
 
Well you know what I always say, when you run out of conventional Wood Ape evidence, make it up with some AUDIO of rock throwing. :eye-poppi

Audio clip 1: A wood knock just before dawn right outside the cabin.
Audio clip 2: A rock hits the cabin then a very loud wood knock.
Audio clip 3: Huffs then a rock is thrown onto cabin and rolls around.
Audio clip 4: Huffs then a rock hits the cabin.
Audio clip 5: More huffing before a rock slams the cabin.
Audio clip 6: A whistle, shuffling, huffing, and a rock.
Audio clip 7: Huffs, rock through the trees, slams cabin, then bounces onto the ground.
Audio clip 8: Single huff, then rock zips through trees and pounds cabin.
Audio clip 9: A rock rips through tree limbs and then falls short of the cabin thumping the ground.
Audio clip 10: While the team is talking in front of the cabin around the fire circle, a rock flies through trees and strikes the cabin.
Audio clip 11: A rock hits the loose corrugated metal on the shed and bounces.
Audio clip 12: The so-called “rain of rocks.” While the team lay in bed asleep, the cabin was repeatedly struck by rocks on the roof, and on two walls, including a porch. It went on for several minutes. This is the abridged version.
Audio clip 13: What team members refer to as a “mouth pop,” or "click," documented many times in the field.
Audio clip 14: A recording from NAWAC field audio of what could be “faux speech."


"We'd like to present the case for a new uncategorized bipedal primate based on the concept of Rockeria™ (and its Bedrock affiliate Rockerio®). Originally developed by F. Flintstone and B. Rubble, it theorizes that if the precise trajectories of certain thrown rocks are calculated out to 3 1/2 decimal places, the exact physiology/biological make-up of the thrown rock's perpetrator is revealed to anyone looking in the right place. We know how to look in the right place. Nobody knows exactly how it works and it doesn't work at night, but it's a solid theory and never fails. Except at night. And it always says the same thing, 'Wood Ape'. Wait hold on, what's that Parker, now it says 'Would a pen do if we can't find a pencil?' Nevermind."



P.S. I double dog dare you to listen to the AUDIO of rocks being thrown. It's just so ******* fascinating. :thumbsup:
 
I listened to #12. Somebody is throwing rocks, maybe more than one person.

Has not a single person come away from Area X and said that people are throwing rocks at the cabin?
 
William Parcher said:
I listened to #12. Somebody is throwing rocks, maybe more than one person.
Click to expand...

Most interesting. And that is consistent with the kid's story linked above too - it suggests playing along with the hoax actors. Or being IQ=20 and being fooled. They're not that stupid.

Has not a single person come away from Area X and said that people are throwing rocks at the cabin?
Click to expand...


It does seem like it is a distinctive trait in Area X. As skeptics we can deduce that bigfoot has evolved a rock-throwing skill for food acquisition there. It is a heretofore unrecognized food source, avian. Local Toucans and Canaries. Ostriches.
 
LTC8K6 said:
Game cams would ordinarily catch the rock throwers, so this rock throwing deal is crooked.
Click to expand...

They stopped using game cams, because the batteries were a hassle, and they didn't work very good.

Convenient.
 
Drewbot said:
They stopped using game cams, because the batteries were a hassle, and they didn't work very good.

Convenient.
Click to expand...

First indicator that a footer/habitator is full of it.
Yeah right you've got a creature that arrives at a specific location, at a specific time over a ten year period and you can't even get a picture of it....&#55357;&#56834;
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6 said:
Game cams would ordinarily catch the rock throwers, so this rock throwing deal is crooked.
Click to expand...
Of course. Since there are guns there the rock thrower needs genuine assurance that he will not get shot. The gun guys won't shoot because they know with certainty that the thrower is a person.

This leaves the team in a position of being able to say that it isn't a hoaxer because the danger of getting shot is real and nobody would do that. But it isn't true. It's all a staged performance for each other and Bigfootery in general.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom