• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

President Trump: Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
You really cannot figure this out can you? These top notch "workers" quit because obviously they don't agree or like Trump. You can decide why they quit?

Do you think republicans would do this?[/QUOTE]

if their boss is an unstable and unpredictable loon, and they are in their upper 50's, early 60's, yeah, I can see them saying "**** it, I don't need this ****. I quit"

You do realize these were people at the top? It isn't done! Except by people who are just partisan.
 
They quit because they realize their new boss is nuts! Not a political protest, just, the guy is NUTS!

CNN is saying Trump fired them all -- long-serving career officials with specialized experience and responsibility, including the one in charge of embassy security. Makes the new guy look even crazier.
 
you really have zero clue about foreign policy.

Let me give you a wise quote about Diplomacy:

"Diplomacy is about surviving until the next century - politics is about surviving until Friday afternoon. "


Trump or Tillerson, regardless of how brilliant they are can do exactly squat without preparations, negotiations and trust at the level of Foreign Office staff.

Without them, they will not be able to even codify what they negotiate, and even less get to something that in theory could be signed.
You really haven't a clue on how to get an agenda done. You don't do it with backstabbers like these, good riddance.
 
CNN is saying Trump fired them all -- long-serving career officials with specialized experience and responsibility, including the one in charge of embassy security. Makes the new guy look even crazier.

Lol
Yes, firing the loser left would look crazy to leftists.
 
What's the over/under on how long it takes for Trump to say "I know you all voted for me." at his pending speech at the GOP retreat?
 
By what imperative do you propose a man should stay in a job he doesn't want to do? Are you not free to work for whom you wish, when you wish under whichever contractual terms you wish?

Why would you deny the same to these people. It's like wanting to own a gun, the why of it is not important. They don't want to work in that position any more, you don't get to judge them for simply exercising their freedom.

This post is just not even following the thread, lets see if you can amazingly figure out where I'm coming from. Start from stackos first post about the incompetent losers leaving because of politics.
 
Mexican President cancels trip.
The way Trump is going, we will be lucky to have friend left in six months....except for Putin,and that might be more of a "Master Slave" relationship.
 
And you know their individual politics, how?

:confused:



As far as I can work out, and it's tricky, anyone that doesn't do what logger would have done and doesn't think like logger does is a 'leftist'.

On this basis, logger knows that he himself would not have resigned in the circumstances these people found themselves in (Although he lacks facts, he doesn't let that slow him down.) therefore they are 'leftists' by definition, i.e. indulging in non-logger approved behavior.

I'm not even sure the term 'leftist' has a firm meaning in loggers head. I think it's a meta-syntactic variable.
 
Well, to put a partisan spin on things, this is Trump draining the swamp. He promised to get rid of a lot of career politicians and bureaucrats. It's working.

But, of course, "working" is really defined by results, isn't it? Let's see if Trump-picked replacements do a better job. There's no point predicting disaster, although it does create an opportunity for a "see I told you so" later.
 
This post is just not even following the thread, lets see if you can amazingly figure out where I'm coming from. Start from stackos first post about the incompetent losers leaving because of politics.

If you want me to figure out where you're coming from, you'll need to explain it to me.

I still want to know why you think these employees should be shackled to work for the government against their will. In America. What the hell happened to freedom?
 
I'm sure it is to the left, hell the SS agent who refused to take a bullet for him would be considered "principled" by the left, but all it does is show which ones need to be fired.

I fully agree that she should be fired.

I also agree that she was principled, and probably said what the vast majority of them are thinking.
 
This post is just not even following the thread, lets see if you can amazingly figure out where I'm coming from. Start from stackos first post about the incompetent losers leaving because of politics.

The first bolded is based on what, exactly? The second, appears to be because Trump fired these guys, because he's a LOON!
 
You do know these officials worked under both Democrat and Republican Presidents?

But don't let that interfere with your worship of Dear Leader.

And I supposed you're just forgetting how politically charged this campaign was? So as a leftist, it's your contention they left because Trump is crazy? They didn't even have the courage to try and sway him, they just decide to leave?

Now they don't even get an invite into the bunker when Trump blows up the world. :rolleyes:
 
No, I'm just pointing out the obvious.

In this case the "obvious" is not true.

Your problem, logger, is that you are utterly and entirely ignorance of other people's political views. You simply don't understand anything about the topic, so naturally you put your foot in your mouth every time you speak about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom