• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

Status
Not open for further replies.
AlaskaBushPilot said:
The lecturer claimed 100kW units would be produced in the first half of 2017. So this bet being laid here is at least six months too late and more than that really. There is a working prototype before production. The production model is not the first one that works, lol.
Click to expand...



I know the con man's rule is, "Never give a sucker an even break", but I aspire to something slightly better with this sucker bet.
 
I see that our esteemed interlocutor is notable for his absence. Was there an actual flounce?
 
He (gender assumed) seems to have made himself scarce around the time we started discussing the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.
 
Myriad said:
He (gender assumed) seems to have made himself scarce around the time we started discussing the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.
Click to expand...
Well played, sir.
 
Myriad said:
He (gender assumed) seems to have made himself scarce around the time we started discussing the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.
Click to expand...

Then out of respect, we should never mention the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.
 
fagin said:
Then out of respect, we should never mention the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.
Click to expand...

But never use large fonts, because search engines consider it to be important text and they build potential queries around them.

We should use little fonts instead, like in the following example:

«Then out of respect, we should never mention the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.»
 
aleCcowaN said:
But never use large fonts, because search engines consider it to be important text and they build potential queries around them.

We should use little fonts instead, like in the following example:

«Then out of respect, we should never mention the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.»
Click to expand...


It occurs to me, this is a serious enough question that we should have multiple threads discussing each aspect of hydrino pollution. Nuclear risks, impact on human health, impact on the food chain, impact on wildlife, and so on
 
Myriad said:
He (gender assumed) seems to have made himself scarce around the time we started discussing the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release. Perhaps he changed his mind about encouraging discussion of the system if it's going to result in phrases like hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste coming up in Google searches of Brilliant Light Power or hydrino energy.
Click to expand...

I really like the idea of linking Brilliant Light Power and hydrino energy to potential negative environmental impacts of hydrino release, hydrino pollution, hydrino toxicity and hydrino-related industrial accidents. It's more or less a perfect instance of an anticrime.

Dave
 
T

How could you have 100kW units rolling off an assembly line this year?

Just lay down the business plan, if you say there is one. You've already got the building location, the equipment on order, a "front office" staff and then your accounting, shipping and receiving, inventory control yadda yadda "back office" staff being geared up. You know the heating and light budget, payroll, tax withholdings, insurance, worker's comp - all that budgeted out, right?

I got tired of watching that video pretty quickly and searched around for the business plan.

The first slide called "Business Plan" comes up at about 29 minutes. That stays up until 45 minutes where he just throws out the assertion that it will cost less than a tenth of a penny per kW hour operating cost and under $1 per year capital cost.

That's remarkable without even naming the material it is going to be made out of. Why did they make a stainless steel "prototype" that doesn't work? Might as well be made with clay.

He keeps saying they are going to make them out of "High Temperature Refractory Materials". Well just name whatever it is, lol. Put the cost per unit up on the overhead and tell me how much is in each unit, etc.

He later claims it is made out of tungsten. Okay, then why isn't the prototype already made? Bizarre.

It seems to me that bouncing back and forth between the bogus business plan and the lab is a conscious effort at distraction. He mumbles something about having a working prototype in the "first half of 2017" or something at 52:12. He would be loud and clear, putting dates up on the board with actual dollar cost figures.

Says they are going to lease everything and "partner" everything. So they don't have to present capital cost figures. Okay, then put the lease figures up, lol.

The by-product is dark matter. Oh, that's cool. Environmentally conscious consumers will be excited about a recycling bin for dark matter. Like your aluminum can bin. Paper bin. Dark matter bin.

Because it is a light bulb inside a photovoltaic converter housing. The dark matter comes out somewhere, like a little chute, and you empty your dark matter into the Dark Matter Bin.

When you are backpacking, does dark matter attract bears? Does it go in the bear proof containers? Because they're scaleable down to the size of a thimble so you'll want it backpacking.

I can see forest service signs "Take Your Dark Matter With You" or "Dark Matter Baggies Required".

Well at this point it started being pretty *********** entertaining. :)

A trillion dollar market. Blah blah blah. Back to basic diagrams about how it is supposed to work. That's it. No more figures.

Talk about a con job.
 
In the CNN video Mills is shown beside a machine with a ball and some copper piping around. The copper unions seemed to be Lokring™ to me, can someone confirm that? I mean, besides all the decorative curves that seem to serve no apparent purpose other but to make some fluid dizzy.

Suppress all the decorations and the whole thing seems to be a prop from a class C space movie during the 50's (science fiction ... ow ow ow ... double feature ... ow ow ow ... Dr X ... ow ow ow ... will build a creature ... ow ow ow...)
 
michaelsuede said:
I'm still here.



As BrLP progresses through the production cycle, I'll be here to post updates.
Click to expand...



Mills will never produce a hydrino based power supply. If the science doesn't defeat him, his inept handling of his IP will ensure more competent firms swoop in and profit from his work.

Whatever he makes from the investment income is all he's ever going to see from his theories.
 
I find the potential environmental impacts of hydrino waste release, hydrino pollution and unknown medical effects of hydrino waste produced by these Brilliant Light Power hydrino energy machines to be very worrying.
 
Last edited:
michaelsuede said:
I'm still here.

As BrLP progresses through the production cycle, I'll be here to post updates.
Click to expand...

Oh hey, great because I've seen enough at least to have a question. In a feasibility study or business plan you put the actual numbers you are forecasting for a designated system.

Each year has revenue forecast. Each year has costs. Each year has an annual profit. Where is the spreadsheet? That's how anyone with a high school education assembles a business plan. I've seen close to a hundred of them since 2007 probably. I did 56 in the first three years for the State of Alaska on grant applications - solar, hydro, wind, battery storage systems, ground heat pumps, sea heat pumps, biomass, and even a geothermal that bankrupted their electric utility. This one:

https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/article/electric-co-op-seeks-bankruptcy-after-well-cost-overruns/2010/10/17/

This story broke shortly after I wrote a report strongly advising not to grant them any money. It was a "free energy" project where they spent tens of millions drilling into a volcano for geothermal. It got great press before this and millions in funding from all kinds of federal and state agencies, and co-op type lending institutions.

It was such ******** to me on first inspection it was crazy anyone had gone for it. I've seen everything from stupid pie-in-the-sky plasma furnaces to working systems kicking ass - those are all hydro. Nothing else came close to hydro in five years looking at these projects.

In every single case they were required to put a spreadsheet together with the out-years all listed to the end of the useful life of the project. They put how much revenue was generated. They put how much the initial capital cost was. Operations and maintenance.

My job was proofing assertions about shipping, construction schedules, cost per sq. foot for their buildings, quotes from manufacturers. etc. The reducing it all to "present value". Discounting future years to the present.

If you couldn't do that, it didn't even get to me. You failed a checklist a high school graduate could perform. This is the most elementary business 101 kind of documentation.

The fact they can't do that - isn't this a red flag for you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom